Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on disability culture
Essay on disability culture
Disability - cultural stereotypes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on disability culture
Hans A. Sanchez Professor Michelle Nava ENGL 035 18 October 2017 The Difference Between Disabilities and not Knowing Things and Overcoming Them Do you have some spare time? Good. Because it will only take a couple of minutes for you to learn a couple of differences about two amazing women who came to the U.S. with either a disability or just not knowing the language. Basically, Amy Tan’s mother and Nancy Mairs are very amazing. They both have a thing in common where they have struggles, whether it’s their language or a disability and they both overcome those challenges; there are a couple of differences between Tan’s mother, who just can’t speak the English language, and Nancy Mairs, because she is literally physically disabled. However, being …show more content…
disabled and being discriminated is just plain horrifying. What Mairs went through is a worse type of physical discrimination and very interesting and you will learn a series of things that will leave you thinking differently in the long run. Amy Tan is stuck between two worlds, while her mother and Nancy Mairs are the ones who are struggling with different challenges. Tan’s mother speaks “broken” English. When she is with her mother, Amy speaks in simple English, but out in the world, she shifts to an English that is more formal and understandable. Amy tells us the story using her mother's language so we can see how expressive her mother's broken English is. Even though the language is not what we may be used to, her story is something we can follow. Amy states, “I am a writer. And by definition, I am someone who has always loved language.” Tan’s attitude towards her mother in this essay is that she is proud of her mother but she is ashamed of her mother English even though it’s not the right English Tan embraces it. This is something that could've affected Amy in the long run and prevent her from being where she is right now. However, the idea in tan’s essay is to see how those who have English as their second language or thick accents face an extreme amount of cultural racism. Tan said, “My mother's English is perfectly clear, perfectly natural. It's my mother's tongue.” (7) Tan grew up having to deal with discrimination towards her mother from a lot of people. Tan always was against everyone’s word she just thought it was her mother’s tongue. This type of discrimination is an ignorant type which many of us could just straight up ignore. This next woman Nancy Mairs is disabled she is crippled and gets discriminated in more cruel way. Nancy mairs is a woman who defines herself as the word “crippled”. Nancy Mairs says “I choose a number possibility, the most common handicap and “disabled.” Most people when they hear those words automatically looks at the person in a weird way. But, that’s not the reason why she named herself disabled, she called herself disabled because she believes it represents her reality. Mairs make a truth seem less harsh and this caused people to look at her as something she isn’t. This woman is a very strong and brave she does not let any of her disabilities get to her. Mairs Says” I am proud of myself and accept who I am and recognize life is what one makes it to be. In addition to this no matter what life is and what you go through it is up to you at the end of the day to decide what you make of it. Both Amy Tan and Nancy Mairs both have struggles and no matter what the case is whether it’s critics, discrimination, or any problems. They both find the way to overcome those problems no matter what the circumstances are. Amy Tan and Nancy Mairs both talk about the English language and American society while including their life struggles. These two women are both discriminated in many ways, they both have similar disabilities. Nancy Mairs talks about the English language and Amy Tan mother have struggles with the actual language however, these women don't give up and successful fulfill their difficulties in the English language. Many of the people in their essay misinterpret their disabilities and went and judge them by their book covers. Racism, discrimination, and tolerance are big dilemmas that non- or American citizens encounter due to their cultures and beliefs. Nancy Mairs had physical discrimination which she accepted and because of that people thought she was different and weird. Nancy Mairs, begins by talking about her life and why she refers to herself as "crippled." Mairs believes that crippled is a more proper definition for her condition than other words like disabled, handicapped, or differently abled.
These euphemisms for her condition cause people to view her as something she isn't. Mairs believes that these words describe no one because "Society is no readier to accept crippledness than to accept death, war, sweat, or wrinkles." She continues her story of multiple sclerosis and the hardships she endured. Mairs goes into detail about how her life has changed since her diagnosis and how she has coped with the disease. She includes her need for help by the people around her but also delves into the fact that she can still teach and perform arduous tasks. She talks about her dependence on her family and how good her family treated her. She says she is scared. “...that people are kind to me only because I'm a cripple."(Mairs,8) Mairs hates that our society is obsessed with physical appearance and normality. She states that, "anyone who deviates from the norm better find some way to compensate." (Maris)This shows that she believes that American society has lofty expectations. She ends the essay by stating how she is getting used to having MS and how she isn't sorry anymore that she is a cripple. Mairs is thankful for what she has and the people who help her in her life. Overall, she is proud of herself and has recognized that life is what one makes it to be. Now from what you learned what do you
think?
The essays, “On Being a Cripple”, by Nancy Mairs, and “Living Under Circe’s Spell”, by Matthew Soyster are both about how each author deals with multiple sclerosis in their life and their opinions on it. Mairs’ piece is a careful examination of her experience with MS and her perspective towards her future. In contrast, Soyster writes humorously of a particular incident he had with MS and artfully weaves his ideas about the disease in with his story. In both instances, the authors share the purpose of narrating their encounter with MS to the world to raise awareness. Both employ the rhetorical strategies of appeals to pathos and varying sentence structures to achieve this goal, some more effectively than others.
Mairs recognizes herself as a “cripple” although many people would not want to be called a cripple since they would find it offensive, but Mairs believes it fit her perfectly. Mairs does not like the term “handicapped” or “disabled” because they are not flattering which is why she prefers the word “cripple”. Although she has a serious condition she does not take consideration of other individuals statements, “whatever you call me, I remain cripple. But i don’t care what you call me” (Mairs). This passage demonstrates how brave and strong she is; Mairs is also optimism because she learned to accept herself the way she is, she eventually became confident enough to joke about her serious condition.
These two essays are about two dissimilar disabilities. Nancy Mairs and David Sedaris act as examples of how an author’s writing can change the tone and meaning of a narrative. Mairs message was educational and encouraging as she explained her life with MS and how society sees her. Sedaris use of experience and memories portrays his life with obsessive-compulsive disorder; what he calls “tics”. These two writers take similar topics and pitch them in ways so the reader can see the illustration behind them.
Her essay is arranged in such a way that her audience can understand her life - the positives and the negatives. She allows her audience to see both sides of her life, both the harsh realities that she must suffer as well as her average day-to-day life. According to Nancy, multiple sclerosis “...has opened and enriched my life enormously. This sense that my fragility and need must be mirrored in others, that in search for and shaping a stable core in a life wrenched by change and loss, change and loss, I must recognize the same process, under individual conditions, in the lives around me. I do not deprecate such knowledge” (Mairs, 37). Mairs big claim is that she has accepted herself and her condition for what is it, yet she refuses to allow her condition to define her. Through her particular diction, tone, satire, and rhetorical elements, Mairs paints a picture of her life and shows how being a cripple has not prevent her from living her life. She is not embarrassed nor ashamed of what she is, and accepts her condition by making the most of it and wearing the title with
Mairs describes her condition and how it relates to the actions and responses of other people in any situation. Mairs uses the term cripple loosely, making sure it is not offensive to anyone. By starting her passage with, “I am a cripple,” Mairs doesn’t hide anything. She begins by coming straight out into the open with who she is and how she wants the world to view her. In the first paragraph, Mairs uses the word choose three times to establish her personal decision to be titled a cripple.
In summation, Mairs challenges the labels brought forward to certain individuals that are different from the rest of society. Examples being differences because of mental or physical disabilities. She prefers to be called crippled rather than handicapped or disabled because the last two symbolically express inferiority and weakness. She establishes her message thoroughly through the use of tone, diction, and
They can have the same hobbies and the only difference is they way of communication, which is just like any other foreign country. Lou Ann was kind of like the connection line between her parents and the hearing world. She interprets, made phone calls, and handled many of their financial transactions. She was like theirs ear into the outside world. It kind of taught me that not only did her parents have a difficult time because they were deaf, it kind of had a big impact on her. She seemed to be the only support for her parents, which couldn’t have been easy. She sort of hit pause on her life to live her parent's. I think one important thing that the book teaches people, is that no matter how hard things get we should always have a positive attitude and try and be optimistic. Walker talks about how she protecting her parents by not telling them about offensive phone calls, which she pretended to be wrong numbers. She later realized that her parents knew what kind of people were out there and that even though people were hateful it was better to be positive rather than being bitter about the
...ive most of their life as a perfectly able-bodied person until a tragic accident one day could rob you of the function of your legs, and you have to learn how to cope with being disabled. Mairs illustrates that being disabled is more common than the media portrays, and it’s hard to deal with feeling alienated for your disabilities. These three authors have evoked a sense of sympathy from the reader, but they also imply that they don’t want non-handicapped people to pity them. The goal these authors have is to reach out to the able-bodied person, and help them understand how to treat a disabled person. The disabled people don’t want to be pitied, but they still need our help sometimes, just like if you saw someone with an arm full of grocery bags having difficulty opening their car door. They want us to accept them not as a different species, but as functional people.
“I am a Cripple,” when people typically hear these words they tend to feel bad for that person, but that is exactly what Mair does not want. She prefers that people treat her the same as they would if she did not have the disease. Throughout the essay, Mair discuses her disease openly. She uses an optimistic tone, so that the reader will not recoil with sadness when they hear her discuss the disease and how it affects her life. In Nancy Mair’s essay “On Being A Cripple,” Mair uses her personal stories, diction, and syntactical structures to create an optimistic tone throughout the essay, so that the audience can better connect story.
Mairs’s inferiority complex which made her question other people’s attitude towards her. In “On Being a Cripple,” Nancy Mairs. She kept believe the way how
Today FDR is not known for his polio disability, he is known as a previous amazing leader of this country. His disability was a characteristic of his persona it did not define him.
Amy Tan tries to spread a non-discriminatory message through her words; telling not judge people based on the way he/she speaks a language. Amy Tan also tries to impose her idea of language bringing people closer. The “broken” English that she invented, just like many immigrants, brought her closer to her mother, even though she was looked down upon in her community due to her ability to speak fluently. This is seen when she had to speak to a doctor when her mother was diagnosed with brain tumor and the doctor told her they had lost the CAT scans. The doctor at this moment was not cooperating with her mother due to her inability to speak English properly. When Amy finally talked to the doctor they were able to find the results and had to give her an apology. This along with many other examples in the essay show how Amy had to help her mother out to get her message across. Using pathos in her stories, Amy Tan is able to connect deeply with those who have encountered such people that speak “broken” English or have judged others in the past. This also makes the audience sympathize for
Due to this disease the body is slowly broken down by affecting the central nervous system of a person’s body. The children depicted in the essay are probably an example how fellow human beings should be around a disabled person. They just view the disabled person as another human being and respect them the same way. The children are proud to associate themselves with Mairs and do not shy away from introducing her to the general public. This is what a disabled person requires: that all those around him or her should respect them for what they are and give them unconditional regard
This essay will explore the medical model of disability as well as the social model of disability by providing an in depth analysis of the views and explanations that outline each perspective. It will examine and establish the connection of the two models in relation to Deaf people. Furthermore it will illustrate how Deaf people are defined according to each outlook, as well as the issues and concerns that arise from these perceptions. This essay will consider the medical model and the social model to compare the ideas and objectives of the given articles; Caught in the Deaf Trap by Karen Van Rooyen, A Brave New World of Sound by Thandi Skade, Fake Interpreters: A Violation of Human Rights and lastly Professor Graham Turner’s; 10 lessons from the tale of the ‘fake’ interpreter.
In middle school I was diagnosed with a disability with the way I expressed myself through writing. Ever since, I have gained multiple values and learned several lessons about self confidence. I was taught to push past my limits, in order to be successful in reaching my goals along with my dreams. Today I am a senior in high school who was once thought to struggle, but was able to succeed beyond expectations. To some, a disability may seem like a setback from achieving goals, but to me I used it as a challenge for myself. I accepted myself for who I was and looked at my disability as a unique trait of mine. I was able to provide a message to others that anything you set your mind to is possible with dedication and hard work. It might take