NCAA aAhletes and Pay

1136 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of student athletics on academic performance

Should college student-athletes be paid has become a much debated topic. The incentive for a student-athlete to play a college sport should not be for money, but for the love of the game. It has been argued that colleges are making money and therefore the student-athlete should be compensated. When contemplating college income from sporting events and memorabilia from popular sports, such as football and basketball, it must not be forgotten that colleges do incur tremendous expense for all their sports programs. If income from sports is the driving factor to pay student-athletes, several major problems arise from such a decision. One problem is who gets a salary and the second problem is how much should they be paid. Also, if the income from the sports do not cover the cost of the student-athlete salaries, tuition cost will most definitely rise. The flip side is that the student-athlete entered college, in many instances with a scholarship, chose to play a particular sport because they like to play the game and have therefore decided to participate and should not expect to be paid as a professional athlete. By paying student-athletes a salary would dramatically alter college life for student-athletes as well as non-student-athletes. With a possible scholarship amounting to $200,000, it can be considered a fair exchange because while they are getting a free college education, they also have the opportunity to showcase their abilities to the professional sports world. Not only is tuition paid for, but the student-athletes also receive books, meals, and housing all under the scholarship. These student-athletes put a tremendous amount of time practicing and playing. This can possibly cause the student-athlete to fall behind in t... ... middle of paper ... ...stitution they attend. Paying student-athletes to participate in any sports program would dilute the reason students attend college in the first place, which is to receive an education. By offering a salary to student-athletes, it would change the reason why students apply to college and universities. Instead of wanting to attend to receive an education, students would rather attend under the sports umbrella in the hopes of attaining an income. Student-athletes should be given an opportunity to participate in a sports program because of their ability and love of the game. Also, colleges and universities would be adversely affected because the entire income and disbursements would change. The standards currently in place to meet the needs of all, student-athletes as well as non-student-athletes will be dramatically altered and therefore, can not be guaranteed.

Show More
Related

  • Paying College Athletes Case Study

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    To pay or not to pay college athletes, that is the question. It seems like it would be a simple yes or no answer, but there are many underlying factors as to why paying athletes would be a negative. All universities vary in size and popularity, so how would it be possible to pay all athletes the same amount? Student is the leading word in the term “student-athlete”. They are not considered employees, which is what paying athletes would make them. While universities are making some profit off of the abilities of their athletes, college athletes make the personal choice to play a sport. Due to the differing popularity and size of universities and their athletic programs, there would be no fair way to pay all athletes. In addition, many athletes already receive compensation in the form of publicity, scholarships, and access to a high education, and therefore the NCAA and universities should not pay athletes.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Should NOT be Paid

    1764 Words  | 4 Pages

    The payment of NCAA student-athletes will deteriorate the value of an education to the athletes. The value of an education for a young man or woman cannot be measured. It is our gate way to success as...

    Read More

  • Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?

    1960 Words  | 4 Pages

    College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.

    Read More

  • College Athletes: Should They Receive Additional Pay?

    1303 Words  | 3 Pages

    Should college athletes get paid an additional salary? They are an important assets to universities and colleges, so why should they not? How else would universities justify taking advantage of these young men and women? These are questions that arise when pondering the issue. This has been a large controversy over the years of rather or not college athletes should be paid, more specifically football and basketball players. However, they fail to mention that colleges are only considering paying a select few, the stars of the sports. Every single sport in colleges is making revenue for those campuses, making colleges money hungry. Thus, if they decide to only pay a select few, would that leave out women sports all together? Why pay college athletes more on top of everything they already receive? Most college athletes receive free tuition, medical care, meal plans and room and board, which can acquaint to more than a quarter million dollars for their entire college career (Scoop, 2013). Why ask for more? What is this teaching our youth? They should appreciate their chance to do what they love and value the education they are receiving, because that education is far more valuable than a potential sports salary. Even though colleges and college athletes have a few good points on why they believe they should get paid, over all the issue is larger than that, college athletes already make their share of “money” through free education and much more.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Shouldn't Get Paid

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... being paid. Many people prefer watching college sports over professional sports based on the idea that money isn’t involved in college sports. They are competing and giving everything they have for the love of their teammates, the love of their school, and above all, their love for the game. Paying athletes would ruin this standard of intercollegiate athletics. For all these reasons, college athletes should not be paid beyond their full ride scholarships.

    Read More

  • College Athletes: Employees or Students?

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...whole different world from professional sports considering they supply men with a family to help grow character with, supply them with a free education, and create a whole community of people that are loyal and generally remain loyal to one school. This bridge between the two sports could be majorly affected if college athletes were to be paid and would then bring up the issue about paying even high school athletes eventually. It is merely opening a can of worms and has been a tradition for so long that it should remain one for years to come. College athletes might not be receiving a full salary but that is not the point of it and they know what they are getting into when they commit to playing a sport. This long-standing barrier between professional and college athletics should remain how it is for the good of everyone but mostly the athletes and college programs.

    Read More

  • Should College Athletes Be Paid?

    2435 Words  | 5 Pages

    Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?

    Read More

  • College Athletes: Amateurs or Full Time Employees

    2012 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ever since college students started playing sports, back in 1879 when Harvard played Yale in the first collegiate sports game, the question of whether college athletes should be paid was addressed. From that point on athletes, coaches, and college administrators have brought forward points agreeing or disagreeing with the notion of paying college students. The students argue that they deserve to be paid due to the revenue that they bring for the college and because of the games they play and the championships they win. At first the idea of paying college athletes was out of the question, but now the argument has gone from a simple yes or no to a heated debate. Since college athletes are given a free education, they should not also be paid.

    Read More

  • Should College Athletes Be Paid?

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many people who are in favor of the change.

    Read More

  • Student Athletes Should Not be Paid

    1793 Words  | 4 Pages

    Student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at State University, because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit. Intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, the strife and the substantial sum of money are the most important factors of most university administration’s interest. Student athletes should be just as their title states, students. The normal college student is struggling to make ends meet just for attending college, so why should student athletes be exempt from that? College athletes should indeed have their scholarships cover what their talents not only athletically but also academically depict. Unfortunately, the disapproval resides when students who are making leaps academically are not being offered monetary congratulations in comparison to student athletes. If the hefty amount of revenue that colleges as a conglomerate are making is the main argument for why athletes should be paid, then what is to stop the National Clearinghouse from devising unjust standards? Eventually if these payments are to continue, coaches, organizations, and the NCAA Clearinghouse will begin to feel that “c...

    Read More

  • rogerian argument

    1081 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ecks and be treated as a farm system for the NFL, NBA, or MLB. If these athletes started getting paid now, at the college level, then the major leagues of these sports would suffer tremendously and lose marketability and money. A final solution to not having players get paid or receive certain benefits is maybe these head coaches of certain universities should not be getting the average 2 million dollars a year to be a coach, in some cases more than the presidents of these universities.(Chicago Tribune) There could be major strides made by simply merging that athletes shouldn’t get paid in whole dollars, but should receive paid benefits in which they would not have to worry about starving, losing scholarships due to injury or sub-par play. That I think would make the world for college athletes a better place, where both the schools benefit and the players benefit.

    Read More

  • College Athletes Deserve to Be Paid

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!

    Read More

  • Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    One being, “college athletes receive a free education” (McCauley). As mentioned earlier the education that they receive is not the value of a typical college student. These athletes aren’t treated the same as their peers and don’t receive as challenging or as good of quality as any average college student. Also, most college athletes don’t even stay in college for the full four years. This is due to them not being able to afford staying in college and need to find a job, or they reach the pros. Compensating them in college would give them a reason to stay for all four years and possibly graduate. “Would all the athletes get paid the same amount? If so, that certainly seems strange and borderline unfair” (McCauley). Just like professional sports, different sports get different amounts of revenue. A professional U.S. basketball player will make more money than a professional volleyball player. So that would be the same in college. If the sport the athlete plays makes more revenue for that school, then they would receive higher compensation. If the athlete holds more value and creates even more revenue for the school, they are obligated to higher pay. Just like in professional sports, the more value a player had, the higher they would be

    Read More

  • Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

    1062 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not all universities bring in as much money as powerhouse sport programs like a Louisville. So there will be questions like, “How much will each player get paid?” and “Should top level athletes in the sport get paid more?”, theres is so many ways this could go. This method could go on to athletes making decisions on what school they want to attend based on how much more money they could make at University. Paying students will lead the concentration and emphasis to sports as to the reason why they are in school, for their education. The student athletes at colleges receive the benefits of the providement of high quality education in the world from which they can go on in life. Student-athletes entertain people with their skills in the sport and if the NCAA decides to pay college athletes, they will move the colleges further away from the main stated goals of educating them to making it more businesslike. This focus will disrupt the main point of college which is to learn. Another aspect in paying student athletes is that not all will be responsible with their finances. Most student athletes would not handle and their manage their money wisely. Now with all this money, how will student athletes respond to academics and their nature for the sport. If they are given this money, these athletes may think it is not necessary to go to class. With money given to the athletes, the students can have

    Read More

  • Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

    1687 Words  | 4 Pages

    Do you not wish you could play a sport for a couple more years after high school? That contingency would be an opportunity most students would love to enjoy. “Playing college sports is about getting to play the game you have an unexplainable obsession with for four more years. And that is a privilege, not an occupation” (Murphy, 2). Many people think these athletes should get money for all the work they put into these sports, but there are many reasons against this opinion. Although the argument is that athletes at a collegiate level do not have as much time to work for extra money like other college students, college athletes should not be paid for choosing to play a college sport.

    Read More

More about NCAA aAhletes and Pay

Open Document