Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Spending money on space exploration
Spending money on space exploration
Effects that long term space flight has on the human body
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Spending money on space exploration
NASA Funding
On October 1, 1958 the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was created because of the competition to get to space between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War. Today, the organization still runs in locations across the U.S. providing research and technological advances. The budget of NASA has varied throughout the years due to fluctuation in funding from private companies and the government. However, NASA should not receive budget cuts because of the technologies it has created that we use now, NASA’s plans for the future, and currently it does not receive as much government funding when compared with the positive economic impacts.
One reason NASA should not receive budget cuts is because
…show more content…
While many people are doing studies on Earth, “the ISS will continue to host studies to understand the physiological and biological effects of space on humans, such as bone and muscle loss, diminished immune efficiency, slower wound healing, and poorer cognitive performance” (“Benefits Stemming from Space Exploration”). NASA has countless future plans involving studies of the human body on the International Space Station. Due to the microgravity in space, there are studies that cannot be conducted on Earth. Therefore, if the funding for NASA is cut, many opportunities for medical advancements will be lost. There are many NASA plans that could affect people in the future. For example, in order to go into deep space exploration, NASA will need to create new and improved technologies. Some of these new technologies include an increase in power efficiency, lighter structures, and higher energy density storage devices. (“Benefits Stemming from Space Exploration”).These are a few examples of the many anticipated innovations coming from the exploration of deep space. If people want to use the technologies discovered by NASA in the future, it will have to continue to receive funding. If the NASA budget were to go down, these new innovative technologies might not be able to be improved or invented at all. Overall, funding NASA will provide many benefits for the
NASA helped usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and it was rewarded with a rapidly-eroding budget. The U.S. should invest more money in NASA and less on unnecessary health care and military. Budget cuts are affecting our technology development. Evidently, increasing NASA’s budget to 1 percent of the federal budget will not hurt the economy. But instead it would benefit by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers.
In July of 1958, President Eisenhower passed the National Aeronautics and Space Act, which established the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as a response to the Soviet Union's launch of Sputnik nine months earlier. That administration, now known worldwide as NASA, has become an icon of space exploration and mankind's accomplishments. Who would have thought that fifty years later, NASA's future would be so uncertain? Congress has recently proposed a bill that would significantly cut funding from the NASA's Constellation program. These budget cuts are unnecessary and are counterproductive to the original idea of the space program.
An article on NASA's website shows me a testimony by NASA Administrator, Dan Goldin, who spoke before the U.S. House of Representative's subcommittee after the NASA budget received an eleven-percent reduction in funding. Mr. Goldin feels outrage that the space program would be expected to function on such restricted funding. Goldin states this kind of cut would "gut space exploration." With closures of NASA centers and significant layoffs, Mr. Goldin predicts this budget cut will affect employee morale. Mr. Goldin poignantly states, "Perhaps most sadly, we will lose the opportunity to inspire a future generation of children." (http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/Goldin/2000/testimony) Goldin's issue is the reduction in his budget. In my experience with budgets, reduction of the budget means, Goldin and his team are going to have to cut costs. Reading between the lines of his argument, I presume the eleven-percent are costs he does not want to cut. It must be his beli...
Support A: SECOND POINT: Astronaut’s health are the first priority before travelling to space however, it is proven that space exploration or staying in the space can actually affect a person’s health. Support A: According to a study done by NASA, astronauts that stays in space for six months or even longer are found to have some changes in their eyes and their vision.
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
This administration is taking money from NASA for science programs. The Obama Administration cuts make it really difficult to keep track of NASA’s programs that take astronauts to the moon and mars. So while NASA is wasting time and money on space travel privatization, more attention should be focused on space exploration. If space is not studied more that can lead to other problems. It can lead to problems like black holes, life in space that can put our lives in jeopardy, and do other harmful things. According to Lamar Smith, “The Obama administration has consistently tried to cut NASA’s space exploration budgets in order to fund increases for earth science programs”( par. 2). Since the Obama Administration is taking away money from more exploration. NASA should put the privatized space travel aside because more important things should be focused
The National Academies Press (2012) NASA’s Strategic Direction and Need for a National Consensus retrieved from http//www.npa.edu/openbook.php?record_id=18248&
When talking about the current space program, Neil Degrasse Tyson once said, “I got angry with America, because advancing is not just something you do incrementally. You need innovation as well, so that your advances are revolutionary, not merely evolutionary” (Tyson 3). America used to have the top space program in the world. Being first to the moon excited the country and gave everyone a sense of pride and fulfillment. Lately, though, we have been falling behind in space exploration. A successful space program is needed in America, and here’s why: we are losing our grip on the title as the world superpower and a new age of economics and politics is coming faster than we are prepared for. To be prepared for this new age we need the funds,
The United States of America currently faces a predicament. The country appears divided when it comes to the dispute over the continuation of the great space race. Ever since NASA began, the association has made tremendous strides in the exploration of space. Established on October 1, 1958 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration began operation. The administration is an executive branch agency responsible for the United States’ civilian space program and aeronautics and aerospace research. The mission statement of NASA is “to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research” (NASA). President John F. Kennedy continued President Eisenhower’s
Another major need for astronauts in space is simply to be able to move around and not have to worry about being sucked into space as well as to not have to wear that clunky space suit all the time. This led to the invention of airlocks and extremely well insulated compartments with safety measures to block off and war of any holes that could possibly be in the shell of the craft or lander of any kind. There are people out there who say that space is best left alone however there are many scientist that have proven the point that eventually we will need resources. It could easily be within 15 years but it could also be as late as 300 years down the line, It simply relies on the fact that we need to start conserving and in space they are all
The 1960's brought new advancements for all of Earth. Machines and men were sent into space, and this sparked a new government agency, called NASA. Space was a new frontier, and virtually everyone was interested in exploring it. Over the years, the interest in space exploration has weakened, and NASA was almost terminated from existence, although there have been many advancements in it over that time. Space exploration should continue because it could help solve many problems on Earth, such as overpopulation and lack of resources. Exploration of the final frontier must continue in order for human life to continue.
Space is a place that everybody don’t know. Many scientists spend their whole life to search the space because of human curiosity. Like the NASA they spend money to do research space and find another planet for more people survive and new resources for future generations to utilize. In my opinion space exploration is worth the money.
According to New York Times, president Obama said that “‘In the years that have followed, the space race inspired a generation of scientists and innovators, including, I’m sure, many of you. It’s contributed to immeasurable technological advances that have improved our health and well-being, from satellite navigation to water purification, from aerospace manufacturing to medical imaging.’” Everyone contributes to NASA every year, and NASA has given many people jobs which has changed so many of the workers lives by inspiring and innovating. If space exploration stopped then many jobs will be lost from the citizens of the US. Think about the other
Today I will be proving that we should “Stop exploring space because it’s just a waste.” I will be presenting three main arguments to support my case. My first argument is that space exploration costs too much and we could spend this money on more beneficial aspects. My second argument is that astronauts are at a higher risk of developing serious health issues and in some cases, unable to return to Earth.
One of lesser-known benefits of exploring outer space is the medical breakthroughs scientists discover. It is true that space in a gold mine for much of the modern day health discoveries, yet many people don’t seem to have knowledge of this. A few major medical devices are, a laser angioplasty, an ultrasound skin damage assessment, a human tissue stimulator, and a cool suit. These are only some of the prominent discoveries made a group of intellectuals aboard the Internation Space Station (ISS). This band of people uses the unique aspects of outer space such as zero gravity to perform and uncover new information about medicine (Ferrell).