Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How I improved my writing
How I improved my writing
How I improved my writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Style is something everyone has. From our clothes and hair to the type of cars we drive and things we buy, style is a part of our everyday life. Writing is one of the many ways people can express their personal style. I will share with you what I believe style is as well as the areas I strive and lack in my personal style. Hopefully I can help you achieve a new stylish way to write.
Style is something that is unique to everyone. Style is a blend of the use of punctuation, which can be used in a sentences as well as at the end; types of sentence structure such as simple, compound, and complex sentences; the choice of vocabulary and the level of complexity; as well as if the person decides to use figurative language. Style doesn’t have a concrete set of rules. You can uses as many literary devices as your heart desires; however, too little may make your writing less interesting to the audience. Style is an element of writing that is personal to each individual which
…show more content…
In writing, my personal strength is using figurative language. Using figurative language such as metaphors and similes are specifically where I strive the most. They come to me as easily as breathing air. Another strength of mine is I have a satisfying choice of words. I’ve ways been told this by my family and peers when simply talking and it’s more noticeable in my writing. I believe I do so well with these two areas is because they were the main focus in my previous English classes. Another benefactor would be my parents being raised in England and teaching me the “proper” way to speak. Even though figurative language and word choice might be my strongest areas, I still am far from mastery and need
Personally, I cannot identify my exact writing style. I do write with clear, concise, fluidity; however, I have no sense of “personal style.” I construct each written assignment with the intention of being blunt and supporting my assertions with facts and details that will strengthen my argument. After reading Ch. 1 “The Transaction” I agree with that Zinsser proposes: my writing reflects who I am as a person (5). I am blunt and to the point. I get tasks done in the most efficient way. Maybe my personality does come through in my writing more than I thought.
What is the definition of style? Is there an exact way of interpreting style individuals create in their writing? What is the importance and function of style in the writing process? Does style really matter? Before encountering books such as William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White’s “The Elements of Style” and Joesph M. Williams “Style Toward Clarity and Grace” I had not put much thought into these questions. My main focus was to get my writing assignments completed, turned in, and out of my mind. However, these two books create a whole new outlook on the world of writing for any individual who can open the cover and their mind.
Stylish writing has never been much of an issue before reading Strunk and White and Williams. I personally would interpret style as being an individual refection of one’s self. In reading “The Element of Style” and “Style Toward Clarity and Grace” I learned that style isn’t necessarily just a reflection of an individual’s style but it is also how the many rules to writing are used when composing a piece. In Strunk, White and Williams’ attempts to educate formal writers on how to write stylish, understandably, and within the rules, they give great examples of the usage of correct grammar, composition, and words and expressions.
Writing style is an important part of any authors’ work because it provides a relationship between the reader and a writer. Unlike Safire, Vonnegut is more of a technical writer as displayed in his writing “How to Write with Style”. In fact, Vonnegut uses less narrative than Safire and displays more of an informative format of writing offering his audience a step-by-step guide on writing with style. Different from Safire, who offers an amusing read, Vonnegut offers his readers a guide to writing style, listing out important steps such as the following: “find a subject [people] care about, do not ramble, keep it simple, have the guts to cut, sound [natural], say what [people] mean to say, and pity the readers” (40), creating a source of reference, in quirky ways, which engages readers. Although Safire illustrates the importance of paragraph structure, his readers might still need further council due to the lack of direct guidance. Whereas Vonnegut is more structured and organized, providing a direct step by step instruction dressed with detailed examples with every point, giving his audience the ability to dive right in. Vonnegut’s main objective is to help his readers understand that style is a special relationship that a writer creates to connect with his or her readers. In addition to claiming “If [writers] scribble [their] thoughts any which way, [the] readers will surely feel that [the authors] care nothing about them” (40), Vonnegut offers one of the most valued bits of advice to people looking to improve their relationship between themselves and their audience: “[The] audience requires [authors] to be sympathetic and patient teachers even will to simplify and clarify...” (43) although both of the informative papers are excellent sources of material, the
“Style is how you write, and you write well when you are interested. A writer’s own interest in the story is the essential thing. If there is a flash of warmth in him it is repeated in the reader. The emotion is bigger than style.
When I initially thought about writing style I believed that there would be some nice neat definition, and maybe a few rules that would govern writing with “style”. It turns out that I grossly underestimated this topic and while I knew that writing style would be a topic of considerable depth, I did not fully understand the degree that I would be pondering the issue of writing with “style”.
Another one of my strengths as a writer and a student is my determination to complete every assignment to the best of my ability. I have never been the type of student that does not get her work done, whether it be an essay for English or a workbook page for Geometry. I work diligently in all my classes and aim to learn as much as I can from every assignment. Since English is not my best subject, I work twice as hard to improve every day and bring out the best writer in me. My determination is what drove me to enhance my weaknesses and polish my strengths.
One strength I saw myself, as having when I enter college is being able to understand and critical think about a essay/article that I have read. However, after taking English 101, I have now learned that this is a strength of mine as well as a weakness.
What is writing style? I started out thinking that writing style is a personal thing and that all writers have their own style. But, this way of thinking is really just a simple way to answer the question. After more careful thought, I realized that style is actually quite the opposite of personal and original. Style is a form of standardization. As writers, we all follow certain rules and guidelines to make our point. Style is these rules and guidelines.
When I sit down to write a paper I simply just stare outside from where I’ am sitting, until a great sentence comes flying across my head. If that doesn’t work or simply start double guessing myself, I end the conflict in bringing both my sister and parents into the argument. As a result, they end up resolving the issue through stating what sounds great on the sentence, or what can be done to make it sound better, by following all prerequisites. Most of which ends up giving an excellent pay off, since my parents are in my personal opinion a great help when it comes to starting an essay. While others may argue that parents don’t have sufficient educational background as to help them with anything related to school.
“When we see a natural style, we are astonished and delighted; for we expected to see an author, and we find a man.” (Blaise Pascal). Writing style is the way a text is written to portray the author’s message to the audience. The Reader portrays the struggle of post Third Reich generations coming to terms with Nazi war crimes, by effectively using a unique writing style. Bernard Schlink uses first-person point-of-view, clear and descriptive language, short chapters, metaphors and various tones.
In literature when someone mentions style, they are not talking about the kind of clothes a person is wearing. Instead, style in literature is a literary element that describes the way an author uses diction, syntax, figurative language, imagery, and organization in order to show purpose in a piece of literature. In “Dinner Dandruff” by Robert Fulghum, the author's purpose in writing this essay is to entertain and to inform. Fulghum uses several elements of style. He uses imagery, figurative language, and diction numerous times in his essay.
A writer's style should be distinctive. Indeed, if it isn't distinctive, then it isn't a style. A creative person is someone who imagines what other people cannot. Their value to us lies in expanding our own possibilities. Walls fall. We break out. Art releases what was lost.
Voice; reveals the writers personality. Sentence fluency; is the flow and rhythm of the language. Writing style helps us express whom we are- just like how we dress! For example, everyone has his or her own style. Some like button up tops, some like plain t-shirts.
According to Stephen North, writing is divided into five subcategories: cognitive, expressive, collaborative, epistemic, and political. I have never wanted to put my writing under an umbrella term such as these because my writing style tends to shift between different styles depending on what I write. For instance, when I was in high school, I wrote for the school newspaper for two years. Whenever I wrote articles, I would write objectively (unless if I was writing an editorial, in where I would write factually but with a clear sway that would support my argument) and precisely, using as few words as possible to make my points clearly and effectively. I had to also tie in current events to my articles, especially if I was writing for an important