Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Myra, in My Mortal Enemy, chooses to forsake a life of affluence so that she can marry Oswald Henshawe. As the ramifications of her decision set in, Myra increasingly displays her discontent for her reduced social standing and disposable income. She flaunts her wealth to a significantly poorer family by telling Oswald she got rid of his new dress shirts, because she didn’t like the way they looked on him. Oswald's expression shows “bitterness”(Cather, 8) towards his wife for acting superior to the people of Parthia, Illinois. Myra's actions expose her lust for wealth, and her regret in disobeying her uncle's wishes. By marrying Oswald, Myra broke the socioeconomic barrier and escaped the enclosed space of world that her uncle confined her …show more content…
to. She lived with her uncle in a “fine house… and, had everything: dresses and jewels, a fine riding horse, a Steinway piano” (Cather, 10). She submitted to her uncle’s power, “she was very fond of him, and he knew it” (Cather, 10). The setting of her childhood enclosed her; it was a small space, occupied by less than 1% of the entire population. The luxurious lifestyle afforded to her trapped Myra and persuaded her to acquiesce, at least on the surface, to his wishes. However, we see Myra break out of this enclosed space, when she runs off with Oswald, who was “poor and impractical, a wandering schoolmaster” (Cather, 11). Her uncle's ultimatum that if she married Oswald “he would cut her off without a penny” (Cather, 12) failed to bother Myra, as she opted to marry Oswald anyway. Whether it was defiance or her desire to prove that happiness can exist independently of wealth, Myra chose to marry Oswald rather than continue to be the beneficiary of her uncle's money. Although Myra lived a respectable life with Oswald, she was unable to escape the hold that affluence had on her. Her New York apartment is adequate but not when compared to her upbringing. Although Myra resents her husband and the modest lifestyle he is able to provide, it isn’t until her illness that Myra's unhappiness is truly exposed, when the Henshawe’s lose their wealth and move to a dank shadowy apartment. In her confinement, Myra is forced to face the realities that resulted from her submission to Oswald and acknowledge her regret over the decision to marry him and the subsequent loss of money it brought: “oh the cruelty of being poor; it leaves you at the mercy of such pigs! Money is protection, a cloak; it can buy one quiet, and some sort of dignity” (Cather, 57). The confined apartment she is now subjected to forces Myra to reflect on her life. She subordinated to a man and was forced to follow him into poverty, leaving behind a life of affluence. Although Myra willingly married Oswald in an attempt to escape the confinement of her overbearing uncle, she merely traded one form of captivity for another. With Oswald, Myra lacks the luxuries she had grown accustomed to and once ill, she is relegated to live in an apartment in the hotel that is dark and dreary, a stark contrast to the high ceiling, colorful and open apartment she once lived in. Even in the few instances when she is able to escape her misery, the compact space quickly forces her back to reality: When she has tea “it made her feel less shabby to use her own solver tea things and the three glossy English cups she had carried about with her in her trunk…” (Cather, 59), she attempts to escape the confinement brought on by the small apartment, however the relics of her affluent life return her to her misery. The space overpowers every attempt Myra and Nellie use to forget about the Henshawes socioeconomic reality – “when they [the neighbors above the Henshawes] were in, and active, it was too painful to witness Mrs. Henshawes suffering” (Cather, 59). Myra is restrained to this place that drives her insane; the smallness of the space gives off cruel reminders of the inferior lifestyle she foolishly chose when she married Oswald. The two stories find conclude by allowing the protagonists to challenge the social norms that formerly kept them subordinate.
Myra, who is dying of illness, escapes the confinement of her stuffy, dark apartment. She refuses to succumb to death in an insubordinate manner. By leaving the apartment and embracing open space, Myra rejects the societal pressure to be a kept woman. Myra did not want to die “like this, alone with [her] mortal enemy” (Cather, 85). Myra wanted to recapture the independence she sacrificed when eloping with Oswald. In leaving the apartment, Myra simultaneously conveys her disapproval for the meager lifestyle that her husband provides for her and the impetus that a woman needs a man to provide for her at all. Myra chose to die alone in an open space – away from the confinement of the hotel walls that served as reminders of her poverty and the marriage that stripped her of wealth and status. She wished to be “cremated and her ashes buried ‘in some lonely unfrequented place in the mountains, or in the sea” (Cather, 83). She wished to be alone once she died, she wanted freedom from quarantining walls and the institution of marriage that had deprived her of affluence and happiness. Myra died “wrapped in her blankets, leaning against the cedar trunk, facing the sea…the ebony crucifix in her hands” (Cather, 82). She died on her own terms, unconstrained by a male, and unbounded by space that symbolized her socioeconomic standing. The setting she died in was the complete opposite of the space she had lived in with Oswald: It was free space amid open air. She reverted back to the religious views of her youth, symbolizing her desire to recant her ‘sin’ of leaving her uncle for Oswald, and thus abandoning her wealth. “In religion , desire was fulfillment, it was the seeking itself that rewarded”( Cather, 77), it was not the “object of the quest that brought satisfaction” (Cather, 77). Therefore, Myra ends back where she began; she dies holding onto
faith, but she is free this time, free from constraints of financial concerns, her uncle and her marriage. Marcus Klein in the introduction of My Mortal Enemy notes that because the money that her uncle would have given to her, had she not eloped with Oswald, was left to a convent, she wants to return to her wealth and religious origins. The convent would give her : “a place of quiet but absolute strength and dignity” (Marcus Klein, XXII), something that she wanted. Myra realizes“ the cruelty of being poor... leaves you at the mercy of such pigs! Money is a protection, a cloak; it can buy one quiet, and some sort of dignity” (Cather, 57). She finds independence and strength by reverting back to her original roots and what was once to be hers. She chooses to die next to her trunk, symbolic of her affluence prior to marrying Oswald, and with a cross in her hand, representing the strength and dignity she finally achieved through leaving the enclosed space of her apartment which reflected her subordination to Oswald that stripped her of wealth. She died in an open space that was free of confinement and socioeconomic pressures. Although, she passed away with her trunk, that signifies the wealth that she lose, she still dies “facing the sea…peacefully and painlessly” (Cather, 82), away from socioeconomic constraints. The open space, unlike the confined apartment, did not acknowledge the socioeconomic or male dominance that constrained her from being free. She finally died, and thus was free from her pain, in an open space uninhibited by socioeconomic or marital constraints. Her will declared that she wanted to be buried “in some lonely and unfrequented place in the mountains, or in the sea” (Cather, 83). This reflects her independence gained through her death and escape from the restricted space of her apartment and married life. Analogously to Myra, Margaret discovers independence and self-sufficiency through her refusal to live with Mr. Breen. When she arrives at the train station, outside of the enclosed space, the air is “hot and thick. She sat down to wait, and immediately she was damp and grubby” (McCarthy, 130). The parallel between the weather and Margaret’s remorse are obvious. The weather alludes to the impure act that transpired between she and Mr. Breen. There is a forced accountability for her actions that was noticeably absent on the train. Once departing the train, Margaret must enter the real world and face all of her problems; cheating on her fiancée with Mr. Breen, seduced by the allure of money. When she returns to the train she regrets her decisions to share intimacy with Mr. Breen - “Sooner or later, she knew, the law of diminishing returns would begin to operate, and she would cease to reap these overwhelming profits from the small investment of herself she had made.” (McCarthy 131). She wants to leave the confined space of the train that locks her into being with him. “Her one and a half rooms in Greenwich Village gave him claustrophobia, he declared, and when she pointed out to him that the apartment was charming, he stated flatly that it was not the kind of place he liked, nor the kind of place she out to be living” (McCarthy 132). This idea that he is claustrophobic in a small, poverty-stricken apartment demonstrates his need for power through space. Mr. Breen was fine in the small train compartment that was his, but when he goes to Margaret’s apartment the power dynamic shifts and she is in control. Mr. Breen then asks her to meet him at his suite, a confined space that he controls. Eventually Margaret frees herself from the stifling influence of men. She comes to the realization: “Just below the surface of his genial manner, there was an hostility that hurt her. She found that she was extending herself to please him. All her gestures grew over-feminine and demonstrative… I must let go, she told herself; the train is pulling out; if I hang on, I’ll be dragged along at its wheels. She made him take her home early…” (McCarthy 133). Margaret honestly evaluates herself and in doing so is able to realize the inherent confinement and her desire to be free. When she sees Mr. Breen one last time for cocktails, she leaves him and walks “home alone, trying to decide whether to eat in a tearoom or cook herself a chop, she felt flat and sad, but in the end she was glad that she had never told him of her broken engagement” (McCarthy, 133). By withholding the news of her separation from her fiancée Margaret shows her independence from male authority. In walking home alone and having the ability to choose where and what she eats, unlike in the confined train compartment where Mr. Breen’s server catered meals without selection, she was no longer living a life dictated by a man. Like Myra, Margaret found comfort in obtaining independence. McCarthy emphasizes that Margaret still feels “flat and sad” (McCarthy, 133), but she was able to separate herself from being with men for money without pleasure The two stories The Man in the Brooks Brothers Shirt and My Mortal Enemy both use space to depict the troubles that face the two female protagonists. Cather and McCarthy brilliantly use enclosed space as a tool to reflect on issues The enclosed space reflects the feeling of entrapment that the two women faced in subordinating to a male counterpart for a perceived sense of security as well as the socioeconomic comfort of wealth. Myra and Margaret ultimately escape the enclosed space that confines them; the train car and the dark apartment, and in the process rid themselves of male subordination and socioeconomic dependence.
Previously, the narrator has intimated, “She had all her life long been accustomed to harbor thoughts and emotions which never voiced themselves. They had never taken the form of struggles. They belonged to her and were her own.” Her thoughts and emotions engulf her, but she does not “struggle” with them. They “belonged to her and were her own.” She does not have to share them with anyone; conversely, she must share her life and her money with her husband and children and with the many social organizations and functions her role demands.
... seeing and feeling it’s renewed sense of spring due to all the work she has done, she was not renewed, there she lies died and reader’s find the child basking in her last act of domestication. “Look, Mommy is sleeping, said the boy. She’s tired from doing all out things again. He dawdled in a stream of the last sun for that day and watched his father roll tenderly back her eyelids, lay his ear softly to her breast, test the delicate bones of her wrist. The father put down his face into her fresh-washed hair” (Meyer 43). They both choose death for the life style that they could no longer endure. They both could not look forward to another day leading the life they did not desire and felt that they could not change. The duration of their lifestyles was so pain-staking long and routine they could only seek the option death for their ultimate change of lifestyle.
The interpretations of what comes after death may vary greatly across literature, but one component remains constant: there will always be movement. In her collection Native Guard, Natasha Trethewey discusses the significance, permanence and meaning of death often. The topic is intimate and personal in her life, and inescapable in the general human experience. Part I of Native Guard hosts many of the most personal poems in the collection, and those very closely related to the death of Trethewey’s mother, and the exit of her mother’s presence from her life. In “Graveyard Blues”, Trethewey examines the definition of “home” as a place of lament, in contrast to the comforting meaning in the epitaph beginning Part I, and the significance
Her family life is depicted with contradictions of order and chaos, love and animosity, conventionality and avant-garde. Although the underlying story of her father’s dark secret was troubling, it lends itself to a better understanding of the family dynamics and what was normal for her family. The author doesn’t seem to suggest that her father’s behavior was acceptable or even tolerable. However, the ending of this excerpt leaves the reader with an undeniable sense that the author felt a connection to her father even if it wasn’t one that was desirable. This is best understood with her reaction to his suicide when she states, “But his absence resonated retroactively, echoing back through all the time I knew him. Maybe it was the converse of the way amputees feel pain in a missing limb.” (pg. 399)
In Mrs. Dalloway, Clarissa Dalloway undergoes an internal struggle between her love for society and life and a combined affinity for and fear of death. Her practical marriage to Richard serves its purpose of providing her with an involved social life of gatherings and parties that others may find frivolous but Clarissa sees as “an offering” to the life she loves so well. Throughout the novel she grapples with the prospect of growing old and approaching death, which after the joys of her life seems “unbelievable… that it must end; and no one in the whole world would know how she had loved it all; how, every instant…” At the same time, she is drawn to the very idea of dying, a theme which is most obviously exposed through her reaction to the news of Septimus Smith’s suicide. However, this crucial scene r...
Common among classic literature, the theme of mortality engages readers on a quest of coping with one of the certainties of life. Katherine Anne Porter masterfully embraces the theme of mortality both directly and indirectly in her story, “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall.” Understanding that all mankind ultimately becomes subject to death unleashes feelings of dread and anxiety in most people; however, Granny Weatherall transitions from rushing to meet her demise in her sixties to completely denying she is on her deathbed when she is eighty. Readers have seen this theme of mortality reverberated over and over in literature, but what makes this story stand the test of time is the author’s complexity. In Katherine Anne Porter’s
It tells the story of a woman who lives secluded in mind, body, and soul for about three months in what is a “hereditary estate” (Gilman 462) , but how she portrays to the reader as “a haunted mansion” (Gilman 463). Extremely unhappy in her current situation (a suffering woman who nobody believes is truly ill), she escapes through her writing. Having to keep her passion of writing a secret and hiding it from her husband, housekeeper, family and friends, the story has untold endings to her thoughts due to the abrupt arrival of unexpected guests. The diary helps us to see the quick, spiraling downfall and eventual breakdown of an unstable woman whose isolation from society may have encouraged her imminent disease. Through quickly written journal entries, the audience can see the unfolding of the unstable woman. This enlarges the view of the narrative because it helps show a plot line of the progression of an illness (which is the theme as a whole of the
Dead at the age of thirty nine years young, Flannery O’Conner lost her fight with lupus, but had won her place as one of America’s great short story writers and essayist. Born in Savannah, Georgia, within the borders of America’s “Bible Belt”, she is raised Catholic, making O’Connor a minority in the midst of the conservative Protestant and Baptist faiths observed in the Southern United States. In the midst of losing her father at the age fifteen, followed by her diagnosis and struggle with the same physical illness that took him, as well as her strong unwavering faith in the Catholic Church are crucial components of O’Connor’s literary style which mold and guide her stories of loss, regret, and redemption. Flannery O’Connor’s writings may be difficult to comprehend at times, but the overall theme of finding grace, sometimes in the midst of violence or tragedy, can be recognized in the body of her works. O’Connor’s stories are written about family dysfunction, internal angst towards life or a loved one, and commonly take place on a farm, plantation or a family home in the American South. Her stories of ethical and moral challenge blur the boundaries between her Catholic faith and values, which also include the values of the other religious faiths surrounding her in her youth, simply writing of the pain and struggles which people from all walks of life commonly share.
Mrs. Mallard’s repressed married life is a secret that she keeps to herself. She is not open and honest with her sister Josephine who has shown nothing but concern. This is clearly evident in the great care that her sister and husband’s friend Richard show to break the news of her husband’s tragic death as gently as they can. They think that she is so much in love with him that hearing the news of his death would aggravate her poor heart condition and lead to death. Little do they know that she did not love him dearly at all and in fact took the news in a very positive way, opening her arms to welcome a new life without her husband. This can be seen in the fact that when she storms into her room and her focus shifts drastically from that of her husband’s death to nature that is symbolic of new life and possibilities awaiting her. Her senses came to life; they come alive to the beauty in the nature. Her eyes could reach the vastness of the sky; she could smell the delicious breath of rain in the air; and ears became attentive to a song f...
The play God of Carnage by Yasmina Reza begins with a simple set-up, four parents from different social classes coming together to discuss a dispute between their sons. As the play continues we see the characters slowly becoming less polite and civil as they start yelling at each other, getting piss drunk, and everyone’s favourite, vomiting. Throughout the play these characters are constantly being tested and judged. When Veronica and Michael attempt to show off their material possessions to the Raleighs they are given a metaphorical slap to the face as they physically ruin what the Novaks hold dear to them. In return the Novaks judge the Raleighs on their sense of righteousness and responsibility, the Raleighs social standing allowing them
... her with joy this sense is only experienced while being confined in her bedroom. And as soon as she leaves her room, the freedom she’d just begun to understand is now taken away from her in an instant. She actually died of sorrow and great disappointment of her husband’s return as he waited at the front door.
Funerals are quiet, but deaths—not always” (Scene 1, page 1546). Blanche lost Belle Reve because of all the funeral expenses. Belle Reve had been in her family for generations, and it slipped through her fingers while she watched helplessly. Blanche’s anguish caused her loneliness. loneliness fueled her abundance of sexual encounters.
Louise Mallard is a woman who enjoys freedom and independence. She feels soaring relief and fiery triumph upon realizing that, yes, she is finally free. She is free of the weighted ropes of marriage. She fantasizes of her days ahead, living for herself and only herself. “A kind intention or cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination” (Chopin 234). She views the imposing of one’s will on another person as a crime, no matter the intention behind it. She has a taste of freedom after Mr. Mallard’s death and can finally see days without stress ahead of her. Prior to her husband’s death, young Mrs. Mallard feels tied down and even oppressed. “She was young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression and even a certain strength” (Chopin 233). Despite the typical oppression of women throughout the centuries prior to the 1920s, Mrs. Mallard possesses a free spirit.
Mrs. Mallard is an ill woman who is “afflicted with heart trouble” and had to be told very carefully by her sister and husband’s friend that her husband had died (1609). Her illness can be concluded to have been brought upon her by her marriage. She was under a great amount of stress from her unwillingness to be a part of the relationship. Before her marriage, she had a youthful glow, but now “there was a dull stare in her eyes” (1610). Being married to Mr. Mallard stifled the joy of life that she once had. When she realizes the implications of her husband’s death, she exclaims “Free! Body and soul free!” (1610). She feels as though a weight has been lifted off her shoulders and instead of grieving for him, she rejoices for herself. His death is seen as the beginn...
It pinpoints out how women were taken as during the 1900’s. The story also highlights the extremes of repression and sexism by viewing the woman as mad by a rest cure. In the view of the Narrators role as a woman, lack of intellectual stimulation in her thought and unjust environment usually led her insane. This points out failure in the society in which sexism and oppression was carried out towards women. An aspect of feminism portrayed by the Narrator in the story is how she tries to dismiss John’s opinions. She repeatedly requests him to relocate her to another room downstairs. This is an aspect of feminism which should be encouraged among women to demand for their freedom. The Narrator takes part in not conquering with John. But as time goes she is less able to feel the usual relief. John rejects the request and replies to her that she must spend in the nursery room which is barred and rings similar to those of dungeon on the walls. She is denied the right to choose what pleases her. Later she comes to like the nursery room where other times she locks herself up to avoid husband’s disturbance upon the story. Also the act of Narrator’s wallpaper routine is a sense of imprisonment. She recognizes that the pattern is so ugly like a cage imprisoning women who are desperately trying to escape. The Narrator figuratively tears the bars and the wallpaper of the cage to clear her way to escape.