Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Myanmar economy essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Myanmar economy essay
I originally came from South East Asian country called ‘Myanmar’. Myanmar is basically made up of eight different ethnic groups. The word ‘Myanmar’ represents all the ethnic groups living in the country. Each group has their own state, flag, culture, tradition, gesture, language, heritage, and morality. The ethnic groups are called Kachin, Kayah, Karen, Chin, Bamar, Mon, Rakhine, and Shan. There is also Chinese and Indian folks living in the country. Bamar has the authority over the other groups since the end of the second world war. However, the other ethnic groups has their own leaders, representatives, and armed force. But they are all come together and united as a one nation. The capital city is Naypyidaw. The largest and former capital city is Rangoon. Other notable cities are Mandalay, Mrauk U (Rakhine State), and Pagan. These are historical and ancient cities across the country. The official language is Burmese and other recognized languages spoken by the other ethnic groups. The main religion is Theravada Buddhism. Other ethnic groups practice Christianity. Other minority groups practice Hinduism, Islam, Animism, and others. Similar to United States, Myanmar has its own diversity. However, there is discrimination, and classism exists. The country is largely made up of rain forest, rivers, lakes, costal region, mountain region, and full of natural resources. Myanmar is bordered by China, Thailand, India, Laos and Bangladesh. The population is 60 million people that included the recognized ethnic groups and other minorities group. The country is 261,227 square miles and world’s 40th largest and second largest country in South East Asia. Myanmar economy is largely based on the agricultural producing of rice, vegetables, and... ... middle of paper ... ...gh school, I was taught that French Emperor Napoleon was a good guy. This is not true. In fact he was a dictator, liar and a mass murderer, The French people has praised him as a hero. I have no comment. The presents situations in Myanmar are calm at the time. I can only speculate what will happen in the future. I can only hope for the brighter future. I now live in the United States. I thank my dad to brought me here. Back in my native country, life was pretty rough. I never though of coming to America. If I was still in my country, I will be in the military or working, no doubt. I’m very lucky to be here in America. Even in America, the problems don’t go away. I have to work ten times harder and think harder in order to make a living and do it again and again until my brain explode. All I ever wanted is the quiet comfortable life and I can ask no more than that.
Napoleon Bonaparte ruled in France from 1789 to 1815. Napoleon came to power in 1789 and immediately became a powerful figure in the French government. However, some thought Napoleon was such a great leader. The Napoleonic Empire started to grow France’s territories. Some might have believed that Napoleon was too eager with his rule, while losing and failing to succeed against the power of England, in an attempt to blockade their trade, and of Russia, where he led his army to a defeat and retreat back to France. Even in his success over Spain, the battle still costed Napoleon and his army in men and resources. Napoleon was mostly viewed as a powerful and militaristic leader in some aspects, but others saw him as a coward and terrible leader in other ways.
Throughout centuries, history has presented to life a plethora of individuals who would then impact the world by means of various arduous missions and accomplishments. While certain people are extolled for their grandiloquent changes to society, others may become infamous for imperiling humankind. However, within history lies a character who is interposed between approbation and being loathed, whose name is Napoléon Bonaparte. This particular person was a French leader who ruled as an emperor in 1804 and had performed numerous tasks across his lifetime. As a commander, he performed remarkably when concerning lawmaking, nationalism, military bearing, and restoring order to France.
Napoleon did not always follow through with his theories and ideas about the well being of France with actions, making him very hypocritical; there are however some contrasting points to suggest that not all his choices were insincere. Therefore his initial claims and theories were not completed, his actions contradicted his preliminary ideas. Consequently, Napoleon betrayed the ideas of the French Revolution: Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. We can see how Napoleon Bonaparte repeatedly opposed himself in each one of the French Revolutionist areas. Napoleon claimed to stand for Liberty, to free the people of France and provide them with justice.
It is an indisputable fact that Napoleon Bonaparte greatly changed Europe. It is my position that he was a hero, and changed it for the better. Although I certainly do not agree with some of the methods that he brought about this change, I still agree with the change he wrought. Through him, the era of democracy was ushered in. He helped bring back a basic human right, being that all men are created equal. Nationalism was sparked, feudalism was overthrown, and Europe was modernized. Napoleon changed Europe, and it was a change for the good.
... It is important to understand that since France had just exited a revolution, it was pretty fragile; one big mistake and France might have ended up in another one. Napoleon was not only a child of both the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, he was also a very intelligent person. His cunning and wits led him to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest, enlightened despots of all time. Works Consulted (none of the above).
One of the most controversial figures in European History, Napoleon Bonaparte has never ceased to be a generator of debate and analysis among historians, authors, and students. Napoleon has been closely scrutinized by many in attempts to defend or demote his motives, ambitions, and actions as Emperor of France. Nonetheless, those with true qualities of a ruler are few and far between – and Napoleon possessed the drive and ambition to bring these qualities to their full potential. Napoleon was the hero of nineteenth-century France, restoring the country to its former glory after the violence, instability, and turmoil of the French Revolution. Napoleon was the classic underdog, originally viewed as a “second-class Frenchman” due to his Corsican origins, but rising to success based on his own hard work and determination. He demonstrated the most improbable capacity for resilience; although he faced defeat on multiple occasions, he persevered and continually refused to surrender. As well, Napoleon was a protector and enforcer of “Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité” through the promotion of religious freedom and the nationwide application of French laws throughout his rule.
This source supports the argument of my big thesis by revealing the compassionate side of Napoleon. Moreover, the document also glorifies napoleons reign as the Emperor of france, by indicating his various victories, which helped expand the French Empire. The speech reveals the joyous emotions of Napoleon as he reflects upon his time as emperor. Thus, through the portrayal of Napoleon as being a compassionate leader, my argument of Napoleon being a Benevolent leader is further
The lack of nationalism also proved to be a conflict for the people of Burma or Myanmar. The militaristic government’s philosophy of ruling isolated left people to live in absolute poverty and is a major human rights concern.
My life was no crystal stair for me nor strange path to walk on. My life always goes up and down till now. When I was four years my dad get very sick due to the hard work. That struggle moment make me feel like I’ve left out alone in the darkness also to my mom too.There are a war between burma and karen people.it’s just like ice and fire were fight against each other. Many peoples are dying and some are service.the people that are dying left the scare to their family are like a nail or knife stuck in their heart because of the lost of their love one.Life was tough to live in thailand but we live each day with happiness for about 5 to 6 years than immigrated to U.S. Immigrated to U.S for the first two or three years life was hard and
Napoleon Bonaparte was an interesting ruler in that he was compromised of attributes of both a tyrant and a hero. Napoleon had a strong following throughout his reign and even during his two exiles. He was the emperor of France between 1799 and 1815, following the fall of the Directory. Despite the efforts of the French Revolution to rid the country of an autocratic ruler, Bonaparte came to power as Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte I in 1804. He claimed that he preserved the goals of the Revolution, which can be easily argued as his rule became more dictatorial as it progressed. Despite his departure from some of the gains of the Revolution, he overall was a hero for the French people. Through his military ventures, political changes and social reform, Napoleon proved himself as a hero. This is not to say that there were aspects of his reign that were tyrannical, but he was overall beneficial for France.
Certain individuals approved of Napoleon's reign as the saviour of France. He finished and completed the Revolution by fulfilling the ideals the people of France demanded. A person such as one belonging to the bourgeoisie, or even a peasant would be very satisfied with the way Napoleon ruled over the country. He gave them equality, freedom, justice, and many rights. Such things never existed during the reign of the monarchs before Napoleon stepped in. A banker too would be very affirmative on how Napoleon had truly helped France in its economic problems. He made the franc the most stable currency in Europe, and the banker had witnessed that, as probably one of the bankers of the Bank of France. Another type of individual that agrees that Napoleon isn't the destroyer of the ideals of the Revolution would be his soldiers and generals. He had fought alongside with his men in many battles. Through inspiration, he gained their loyalty, to "follow him to the stars" if he asked them to. Such inspiration would never be gained if he never respected them, if he never treated them fairly. And then, the "Legion of Honour", which awarded to some certain citizens for their civil and military achievements.
Napoleon Bonaparte remains one of the most prominent figures in the history of France, and his impacts on the courses of the history of his nation are so evident and outstanding. Ever since he seized power, there have been many debates and discussions as whether he was the “savoir” and the defender of the French Revolution or was he a tyrant who destroyed the ideals of the revolution in search of his own personal ambitious glory. In this respect, Napoleon is considered as a complex and ambiguous character who is portrayed as an heir to the revolution and at the same time its betrayer.
Pugh, C.L. (2013) 'Is Citizenship the Answer? Constructions of belonging and exclusion for the stateless Rohingya of Burma.', p. 3.
The hero of Burma was born on June 19, 1945 in Yangon, Myanmar, a country traditionally known as Burma. Her father, Aung San was the de facto prime minister of British. He played a major role in helping Burma win independence from the British in 1948. Unfortunately, he was assassinated on July 19, 1947 before Burma became independent. Her mother, Daw Khin Kyi, was also active in politics before and after being married. In 1960, her mother was appointed as Burmese ambassador to India. “From her father she developed a sense of duty to her country, and from her mother, who never spoke of hatred for her husband 's killers, she learned forgiveness” (Parenteau). The name of Burma’s hero is Aung San Suu Kyi also known as The Lady. Aung San Suu Kyi played a vital role in fighting to establish a democratic government and human rights at Burma now known as Myanmar.
With the known death toll of Myanmar Muslims and other minority groups increasing and the Myanmar government publicly admitting to “misplacing” huge numbers of people who fall into the religious minority, suspicions that the Myanmar government is assisting in this religious genocide have justifiably arisen. Globally known extreme religious group Isis is renowned for their religious intolerance.