Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay for ecological footprint
Essay for ecological footprint
Essay for ecological footprint
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay for ecological footprint
We often take for granted the earth’s natural resources that are so vital to our existence and our survival. We don’t fetch our own water; we don’t preserve our own heat; we don’t conduct our own electricity. All these resources delivered to our own homes just as quietly and easily as going outside getting air. But as quietly as they come, they can be just as quietly consumed without knowing how much. Every single day how we live affects the earth’s ecological system. Therefore, it is very important to keep track of how much of resource we consume. Ecological footprint is a helpful way for us to know how much our lifestyle is affecting the earth’s ecological system – a methodology used to measure the level of our consumption of natural resource and the affect such consumption has on the planet. Our lifestyle – how often and how much we drive; how often and how much we purchase new products; how much or less we recycle – can directly affect and put pressure on the planet. Personal ecological footprint helps individual to put in perspective how much their lifestyle directly affects th...
The ecological footprint is a mathematical tool that was developed by Doctor Mathis Wackernagel and Professor William Rees in 1992 to calculate how many hectares of land or acres of land are required to support one human being. Humans use up the planets’ natural resources to survive on a daily basis. These resources include fish, forests, land, water, and other agricultural products. In an aspect, we can think of humans as parasites to the planet Earth because it is our host and we need its resources to survive. Within the means of the ecological footprint, we want to look closely as the production of Earth’s resources, against the consumption rate of the human race. We can think of the ecological foot print analysis as an approach to a global
Generational conflicts, political strife, environmental regulations, stakeholders in big oil, and many more hurdles affect the push to fully sustainable economies around the world and even here in America. In a world where coal, oil, and natural gas are limited, countries are gobbling it all up as fast as they can before other poorer countries come on the grid. Even though America and other countries gobble up these resources the life of the people is still a struggle to meet basic needs. Sustainability is an intermingling of resource use and protection of the “quality of life”, it is met by using resources sparingly and by recycling or reducing the use of other non-renewable resources to provide for our immediate need, but also to conserve and protect the needs of the next generation and to improve the quality of all the lives to come.
There is no hesitation when it comes to whether humans impact the global environment. However, it is questioned in whether human’s ecological footprint is either negatively or positively impacting. In clear perspective, humans share from both sides and their ecological footprint is noted towards whether it will benefit or harm the environment around them. Topics such as overpopulation, pollution, biomagnification, and deforestation are all human impacted and can harm the environment, but some include benefits into helping the world around us with solutions to their problems.
Carbon footprint can be defined as the amount of greenhouse gases an individual produces at a time through diverse activities. A person’s carbon footprint is the sum of all emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), which were induced by an individual’s daily activities for a given time frame. CO2 is one of the many greenhouse gases that are responsible for causing global warming which we are currently experiencing today. Carbon footprint is an extremely powerful tool which we can utilize to understand the impact that our personal activities have on global warming.
Over the years footprints have been used to tell the details of the species that marked it. In the case of carbon footprint it is the amount of Carbon Dioxide or other carbon compounds (green house gases) emitted into the atmosphere by human activities. By simply going about our daily lives of driving to work or running home appliances we are producing more CO2 because each is powered by energy that rely on the combustion of fossil fuels. The burning of fossil fuels by humans emits 98% of the CO2 in the atmosphere making it the largest source of Carbon dioxide emissions and so it is a major cause of global warming (Dowdey, 2013). Fossil fuels include coal, petroleum, and natural gas (Sciencedaily.com, 2013). Carbon dioxide releases have increased intensely in the last 50 years and it is still increasing by about 3% each year. Because CO2 can remain in the atmosphere for 100 to 200 years its concentration eventually increases and causes the Earth’s temperature to rise (Rohrer,2013).
Many people define the term ecological footprints in different opinions according to what effect and good doe’s ecological footprint has. The Ecological footprint is the impact
From my understanding, carbon emissions are the release of carbon into the atmosphere, most commonly due to the burning of fossil fuels like cruel oil and coal. Carbon emissions trap heat in our atmosphere and are partly responsible for causing global warming. The problem with heat being trapped in our atmosphere is that it causes things like the glaciers to melt, the sea levels to rise, the oceans becoming more acidic and the global temperature to rise. One way to be more consensus about how much carbon is being released is to do a carbon footprint. Carbon footprints are the measure of how carbon an individual or group is releasing into the atmosphere.
The Center for Sustainable Economy, ecological footprint quiz was very informative to partake in and the results were impartial to my thoughts based on questions of what I expected in each of the four consumption and ecosystem biomes categories except for one. What I found surprising was the overall results of my lifestyle, that equate to 4.83 Earths, if everyone on the planet lived my lifestyle. Wow!
If for instance, I increase my consumption level, the ecological footprint increases. The main reason for this is that the environment has a fixed size and a number of resources that are the same so if I consume them faster or in high amounts, then it is likely that they will be depleted within a short time. Therefore, it is important that the relationship between changes in my consumption levels and my footprint be understood to help keep the footprint low.
If everyone had the same ecological footprint, we would run out of resources and they would be greatly decreased
After completing the ecological footprint quiz, I found out that it would take about four Earths in order to sustain the human population if everyone how I do. In addition, I heard others whose results were much worse than mine, but the thought the one world I live in isn’t capable of sustaining my standard of living is intimidating. Through trips, class conversation, and readings, I have been able to identify the different areas of sustainability and which of these I need to improve. This way my standard of living can be moved closer to the one Earth than four.
There is no doubt that human activity is having a significant impact on our environment. These environmental impacts include depleting our natural resources, air and water pollution, climate change, destruction of habitats, and loss of biodiversity. Because of these growing concerns, we need to learn how to live sustainably. Living sustainably will allow us to conserve our limited resources more wisely so they will be available for future generations (Withgott & Brennan, 2011, Chapter 1).
Another change that could make a significant impact on my ecological footprint is by having more than one person live in my house. This would decrease the amount of land that is used to house people. This would cause the overall usage of energy and water for my household increase, but overall it would be less than if these people were living in separate places. If everybody were to all live in homes by themselves we would quickly run out of space to house people. Both of these changes that I could make would absolutely make a difference, especially the mobility changes since that is based on the use of a nonrenewable natural resource and the use of these products contributes to climate change.
The most common definition of sustainability is living in a way that meets the social, economic, and other requirements of the current population as well as ensuring the same requirements will be able to be met for future generations. Living sustainably is something that affects every person on the planet. The way we live now affects our lives today, as well as the future population. Some people believe that sustainability and living green will not matter to them as the effects of their actions will not manifest in their lifetime, but this assumption is incorrect. Currently two-thirds of the services provided to us by nature are declining, 85% of all fish stocks in the ocean are overexploited, depleted, recovering or fully exploited. There was a 38% increase in annual global carbon dioxide and it will take 50+ years for the ozone layer to get back to pre 1980 levels. Global warming is one example of long-term change in the environment that has been caused by humans. Other examples are the introduction of nonnative and invasive species, land development, and changes in water quantity and quality. Statistics according to the article Resilient People Resilient Planet. There is no guarantee that if people continue to live the way they are living, things will continue to be sustainable. However sustainability is not just about the environment, social and economic aspects are equally as important to creating a sustainable world. (Figure 1). In this paper I will explain what it means to live sustainably, why it is a problem, challenges and how humans can live more sustainably.
Footprint is a measurement for sustainability and unsustainability based on consumption of resources on goods and activities made by humans. It is a relevant measurement in sustainability since its balance depends on natural resources which is crucial for humanity (Moore, 2011). Footprint analysis can be done on different scales: individual, regional, national and global, depending which areas are considered in the analysis. If the footprint exceeds biocapacity at the global scale, it means that people are using more than can be regenerated (Moore, 2011). According to the Figure 1, it appears that the lifestyle of people in Western countries causes a larger footprint (more than 5 hectares per capita) than the developing countries, whose footprint