Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of a tragic hero
What are the characteristics of a tragic hero
Characteristics of a tragic hero
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of a tragic hero
To answer this question we must address what we are actually being asked. To do this we must evaluate what a hero really is, a true hero is a person, typically a man, who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. The question of nobility in a hero is greatly debated, in order to be a hero is it a crime to know you are and feel a sense of pride and maybe over confidence in your ability? ‘Let no man call me good. I am not blest. My single virtue is the end of crimes’ meaning, heroes are those who recognise they have done something to receive respect and authority but do not brag or call themselves good, furthermore in this essay I will be evaluating on whether both authors portray their characters, mainly Stanhope, as modest and just. I will be evaluating whether they are truly worthy of being named heroes. The question of a ‘flawed hero’ is a very interesting concept, we have to wonder whether the flaws make them a hero because they can be relatable to us, someone for us to look up to, someone to be like, or whether them being flawed takes away some shine from their heroism. Stanhope is looked up to and respected by all his men, whether his drinking problem is a flaw or not, whereas Jack is still on light footing, the respect his men have for him is limited.
Ostensibly Stanhope’s alcoholism is considered a flaw, an imperfection, by regiment ‘Never seen a boy put away the whisky like he does’ the alcoholism reduces him from a man of great power to a boy in the eyes of Hardy, we interpret this as Stanhope slightly losing respect for him as a boy is considered someone you have to look after, to care for, they are not leaders of a regiment, this could be interpreted as his flaw being more prominen...
... middle of paper ...
...is fear, not only does Stanhope show sensitivity he also opens allows us to experience his fear of being deserted himself ‘I’ll have you shot- for desertion’ Stanhope takes desertion very personally, the fact that he would be willing to to shoot someone for desertion could be interpreted that he is not scared of losing people, as long as it is on his terms, not theirs, so he does not have to feel rejection. Stanhope however showed that he does not care about what his men think of him as much as he cares about them ‘I feel the same’ . To us, a modern day audience we consider this to be an act of bravery, to admit your fear, whereas for him to admit his fear then portrayed him as cowardly, therefore he was putting his reputation on the line in order to make Hibbet understand that he is not just brave. This contrasts with Jack, who still has to win his mens approval
Falstaff’s blatantly honest soliloquy has provided the audience with a direct insight into his mind, and contrasts well with Hal and Hotspur’s speeches, in which their moral order and regard for honour is evident. Falstaff helps to show the change in Hal to the audience. Falstaff himself is no different to the Falstaff of Act 1, unlike Hal who has obviously undergone a great deal of change. Falstaff’s speech is highly typical of the tavern world’s way of thinking: straightforward, sometimes humorous, spoken in prose, and only the values of the tavern world taken into consideration, with no regard for such insubstantial, un-physical concepts as honour. In this way, and spoken directly to the audience, Falstaff effectively expresses his unashamed resolution not to submit to moral order.
A hero is a person that has acquired admiration from others for their dignified qualities. Heroes can be found everywhere, but there is one particular hero from the book Cue for Treason by Geoffrey Trease that looms in the crowd. The story is told from the perspective of a 14-year old boy from Cumberland named Peter Brownrigg. As Peter wanders through sixteenth century England, we quickly discover that he is a hero. His actions of bravery, determination, and intelligence throughout the novel clearly demonstrate this matter.
Varying from time, location and person, what it takes to be considered a hero has remained for the most part unanimous and throughout time has been represented in multiple ways. Most present in dated writing, a hero 's image and pride make up a big portion of most heroes. Their heroes aren’t so humble and they aspire to keep their title of "hero". On the contrary, most heroes in literature today are quite modest and don 't expect to be viewed as or considered heroes (more often than not they themselves do not classify with being heroes). As is the case for Beowulf and Katniss Everdeen, both different and yet also similar in terms of action, motives and thought (their personality being what really separates the two). Perhaps the biggest part of how a hero is treated and acts depends on what their society is like. Throughout time, the overall qualities of a hero have remained very similar. What has changed, is
Everyone has their own perception on what defines a hero; some may argue that they exhibit characteristics such as honesty or courage, while others may think that heroes have special power. Our society may have changed the values in which we associate heroes with, but one thing seems to have never changed: the main character of the book turns out as the hero. In my analyst, Holden Caulfield, the protagonist in The Catcher in the Rye, is put on trial as we see through our own eyes how Caulfield can not be considered a hero in modern society.
In many works of Literature, a character comes forth as a hero, only to die because of a character trait known as a tragic flaw; Hamlet from Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Okonkwo from Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, and Winston Smith from Orwell’s 1984 all exhibit that single trait, which leads, in one way or another, to their deaths. These three tragic heroes are both similar and different in many ways: the way they die, their tragic flaws, and what they learn. All three characters strongly exhibit the traits needed to be classified as a tragic hero.
Heroes in literature and history, more often than not, meet tragic ends, unless they were created by Walt Disney. These particular people are often seen as someone who is apart from the masses in morals and attempt to accomplish a higher calling for the common good. The problem with this type of hero is that they are destined for suffering.Two such characters exist in classic literature, Winston Smith of George Orwell’s 1984 and Hamlet of William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.” Hamlet is the true classic tragic hero, though, because he is of noble birth, possesses high moral standards, completes the task he is given to better the world, and causes tragedy in both his life and the lives of others.
A hero is someone who goes on a life journey that is a quest for self-awareness and self-development. Published criticisms of Kesey’s protagonist, R.P. McMurphy, argue that his character is crazy and dangerous; I partially disagree disagree because McMurphy is also adventurous and has a good intention in what he does. McMurphy has a life journey that could consider him as heroic. McMurphy’s journey starts off with him working on a farm then he gets sent to a mental institute. During his time at the mental institute he meets new friends and his mentor, Chief. He also meets his enemy, Nurse Ratched who causes him setbacks. His friends helps him overcome these obstacles. McMurphy became a leader for the other patients at the hospital because he
Being a hero does not necessary mean the person is perfect. Heroes are bound to make mistakes just like everyone else. In the play, The Crucible, John Proctor is portrayed as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a character who makes an error of judgment or has a fatal flaw that, combined with fate and external forces, brings on a tragedy. John Proctor is very selfless and full of pride and dignity, which are all traits of a hero. He also has a tragic flaw, his weakness, which is adultery. He proves that heroes are relatable to everyday people and that they are not as perfect as they may seem.
... taken by popularized “immaculate” characters whose physical strength and stamina are monstrously superior to the norm. Although the coherent, theoretical idea of conceding that generically superior offspring (genome-decisive) with absolutely no inhibiting defects would be far more dominant in terms of predetermined potential, the plain thought of classifying those of inferior statures as worthless causes should be ridiculed. In the recession of what this confirms, prejudice to a term of phenomenal significance should not be tolerated due to the predicaments those subjected have to suffer. “Hero” is a boundless term which even the most disadvantaged person can be recognized as. Nonetheless, established in a concise manner, Kevin is that of knightly caliber. He is a cynosure of sheer wonder, consecrated with the ever so enlightening truth of fulfillment in death.
A hero is considered to be any man noted for courage or nobility of Purpose; especially, one who has risked or sacrificed his life. In Ken Kesey's novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, the reader can see how McMurphy is a prime example of a hero. McMurphy's strength embodies a heroic devotion to the other acutes on the ward.
Heroes come in all varieties and forms and are imperative to almost any story. A hero may not always be the leading man or powerful and prominent figure in a situation and in Shakespeare’s tragedy of Macbeth, the Scottish nobleman Macduff arises from the abundance of characters as a humble hero. Macduff begins as a silent, static character and develops from a less than glorious beginning to eventually help lead(motivate) an army and ultimately save Scotland by ridding the country of its’ apocryphal king. Through this, Macduff can be characterized as Macbeth’s honorable and brave opposition and the hero of the play.
Our cultural definition of the hero has not changed from the ancient period to modern day. Some people believe that heroes have qualities such as superhuman strength and powers that can kill monsters more powerful than any human being. While others believe that heroes are not just about saving other people’s lives or doing good deeds, but they can be leaders who impact other’s lives by having good qualities and achieving them. The critic and author of Beowulf, John Leyerle, suggests that the two roles of a hero and leader are incompatible with each other when becoming a better hero makes them less of a leader and vice versa. He believes that it is either one or the other and can't be both. As a hero, there are many challenges that they face
Throughout life, one encounters people who are to be pitied and people who don’t deserve to be pitied. Abram defined the term tragic hero as someone who is to be pitied, someone who is quite arrogant in his or her remarks, and who is influenced by his “error of judgment”, or tragic flaw. In Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, a respected soldier, Macbeth, is to be bombarded with the most awful misfortune. In this case, Macbeth has two out of the three conditions to qualify as a tragic hero; extreme arrogance and tragic flaw. Even though Macbeth qualifies for most of the conditions of a tragic hero, he does not deserve the remaining condition; pity.
In the history of literature, a person or some people that make a positive change can be recognized as a hero. Heroism has various aspects that the readers look for, such as courage, bravery, selflessness, humility, patience, caring, and other characteristics that make a normal person stand out to be a hero. Although, in reality, heroes have normal human being characteristics as well. There are many different kinds of heroes in literature like juror #8 in “12 Angry Men” who had to stand alone for what he believed was right, while the odds were against him. Also, another type of hero could be the bravest, slaying monster type of hero like Odysseus in The Odyssey. A last type of hero is the hero that is the most normal, and has plenty human characteristics.
Tragic heroes are within everyone, but cannot be fully exposed or understood without the essential tragic qualities. One must be a potentially noble character who endures heroic qualities and has respect and admiration from the society. Consequently, they must be essentially great. Also within the character must be a flaw or weakness that leads to a fall. Lastly, one is required to possess an element of suffering and redemption. Remorse and regret is a necessity for ones wrong doings or deeds. One’s pays for their wrong doings because of failure to find happiness and regrets for actions taken. Therefore they die heroically. In the play “Macbeth” this quality of a tragic hero is portrayed though the character Macbeth.