Mr. Underwood's Rough Childhood In The Bartimaeus Trilogy

1187 Words3 Pages

In The Bartimaeus Trilogy, Nathaniel goes through a very rough childhood in the care of his master, Mr. Underwood. When he first arrived, Mr. Underwood did not show any affection or thought of care for the boy. Instead, he treated him like an unimportant aspect of his life that was a waste of his time and had no interest in teaching Nathaniel anything. If anything, Nathaniel was a burden to him. After Nathaniel had lived in Mr. Underwood’s home for a while, Mr. Underwood began to show a slight bit of respect for the child and was pleased to show him off when he had other magicians come to a gathering at his house. One of them, Lovelace, challenged Nathaniel to a duel of smarts, and after Nathaniel had proven himself well trained in learning much about the origins and spells of magicians, Lovelace called him weak. Then Nathaniel spoke out of turn calling him a “sore loser”, and because he did that, Lovelace inflicted pain upon him with an invisible demon and made him look like a fool with no help from his master. That led to Nathaniel trying to get back at him again and ended up floating in mid air being whipped on his rump until he was unconscious. All of these events led Nathaniel to begin a trail of revenge on Lovelace and in return, stole the Amulet of Samarkand; an object more powerful and …show more content…

He knew that the Amulet was very important to Lovelace after seeing the scene of when it was first given to him. I had looked like someone would have been killed to get it, and someone was. Nathaniel took the amulet out of rage, only beginning to use the powers of a magician, not thinking of the many years and resources that Lovelace had. Nathaniel never took the time to realize what would happen once Lovelace discovered that the Amulet was gone, or what he would do to Nathaniel if he found out that he took it, which shows that the Amulet symbolizes living and

Open Document