Sudarshan Srirangapatanam Mr. Nobody vs. SHARDS Films are one of the most important medium in information transfer since it helps the audience easily visualize the information being presented. In addition to visual representation, films allow us to easily empathize with characters since they are trained in the field of acting. Mr. Nobody is a film that provides you with experience similar to that of Shards, similar story presented in the book form. In this movie we see Nemo (Jared Leto) as our protagonist who has problems with his memory and is trying to access it but is having problems in doing so. Furthermore this movie revolves around a plot in which Nemo is seen in distinct timelines and different characters which are really hard to keep track. However it is very important to consider the claims made in this movie. It is claimed that Nemo as a child is capable of predicting the future and thinks that as long as he doesn’t make a choice everything seems to be possible. And the whole movie is based on this principle and …show more content…
Nobody has many similarities between the book Shards. Both mediums present us with a reverse screenplay experience where the final outcome is reveals at the very beginning in an attempt to make the complicated plot or story a little more comprehensible to average audience. In Shards we see that Ismet ultimately ends up in U.S.A despite the obstacles that he faces in the path, and similarly we see Nemo as a 118 year old mortal in a futuristic world. Many other generalized parallels such as, use of 3 female mates, travel to U.S.A, can be drawn between the two mediums. It is also important to consider strange parallels that can be drawn between the two mediums; in Shards we see dreams and involvement of brain in creating the story and in Mr. Nobody we see that dreams are the driving force in Nemo being able to recall his memory. And both specifically focus on shards of memory which leads to fragmentation of the whole plot or
The movie On Golden Pond, is a representation of the different psychosocial stages society goes through as people age. In the movie, various characters face distinctive crises as they reach a psychosocial stage, which bring tension in the movie. During the movie each character goes through different life challenges such as cognitive and psychosocial developments, which will lead to more appreciation each character’s lives.
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
“I hunt more dangerous game….” Similarities and differences can appear anywhere, especially in the short story and the movie called The Most Dangerous Game. They have similar, yet different expositions, characters, and plots with conflicts. Many people say that books or short stories are better than movies because of the similarities and differences that are found. Books or short stories are usually more descriptive, informative, and do not stray too far from the central idea or main theme, while movies only fall into one or two of these categories. Movies hardly ever fall into all three categories, however if they do the movies become better. This is not the case with The Most Dangerous Game. One place where movies and short stories have major similarities and differences is at the beginning of the story or the exposition.
They both have a theme of racism and the author gave out what it was like for the black community in the past on having to go threw what they did everyday. In these novels, the characters and the society are alike however, unfortunately they have different endings.
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
related to the movie. I will also proposing a research study of how the characters from this movie
... each other and ultimately determine the fate of the characters in the story, especially the fate of the Heroine.
?The Cask of Amontillado? by Edgar Allan Poe is a story about two men at a carnival, the narrator Montresor, who is being eaten by jealousy, and Fortunato, a rich drunk man that has a weakness for wine. It is through deception that Montresor achieves his revenge against Fortunato. He did not believe that killing Fortunato is wrong because of the insults and injures Fortunato brought against him. ?The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne.? (Poe, 75) says Montresor. Montresor brought Fortunato down into the catacomb. This was his chance for revenge.
Things that are similar about the two novels and how both of their dreams were crushed are both are groups of people who have these dreams and each finds or meets something that can help their dreams come true, the pearl and Candy. Furthermore, the realization of their dreams coming to an end is, in both books, caused by the death of someone who is a part of the dream, Coyotito and Lennie.
Aside from the conditions, which lead to the creation of these works, they share a number of other common threads. Symbolism aside these works are very similar on the surface. Both are a collection of seemingly disjointed images, which when put together by the reader or observer serve up a strong social message. That messages being that the wars and conflicts of the times have twisted the world. This is reinforced by the contorted and misshapen images in both works.
those parts unable to work at a normal function are what creates the flashbacks that the
The basic ideas of the two novels are also similar. They have to do with rebellion against the so-called perfect new world and the sanctuary
The biggest similarity between the two stories is the notion of moral decline; the beings start off as peaceful things that don’t need homes, food or anything. As time goes on they need those things and more. After a while they start stealing from each other and eventually hurt each other.
...n (Director) mistakenly seems to believe can carry the whole film. On the strength "based on a true story", he has rejected attention-grabbing characters, an imaginative plot, and unforgettable villains.