12 Monkeys Existentialism

950 Words2 Pages

Kamila Hilal Personality Journal 2 For my viewing of 12 Monkeys, I decided to incorporate what we have discussed in class about Existentialism. After watching the film, I did not necessarily feel uncomfortable but I felt a bit confused and uneasy in regards to my reaction to certain characters. The main character, Cole, meets a patient at a mental institution, Jeffrey Goines. At first, based on his sporadic behavior, verbal outbursts, and content of his speech, I understand that this man, is somehow mentally ill. The possibility of him being “crazy”, whatever one interprets that to be, is very plausible as people that I deal with on a day to day basis do not act like he does. What later made me a bit confused and uneasy was when I focused …show more content…

He goes back and forth in time a few times from the year 2035, to the year 1990 (before the outbreak of the virus), and even World War I. In addition, he himself is plagued by a dream that ends up being a memory (spoiler: his younger, child self witnessed the death of his future self in an airport). Within his journey, he forms a relationship of sorts with a fellow mental patient in 1990 (as Cole time travels into this environment) whose name is Jeffrey Goines. So at first sight, I believed, just generally, that Cole is the more clear headed character, meeting a “crazy” man. As mentioned earlier, what caused my confusion after finishing the film and watching certain scenes was how agreeable I found some of Goines’ ideas were to some of mine. Now, the character and I are far from twins, but in one scene he discusses systems within society such as consumerism: “Buy a lot of stuff, and you're a good citizen. But if you don’t buy a lot of stuff, what are you then? You’re mentally ill.” Now I don’t quite believe this relationship between consumerism, citizenship, and sanity. However, I do find that as newer technology and/or other goods are being offered, and in some cases imposed, those who fail to adapt to these new changes can sometimes be deemed as either old fashion, …show more content…

As I listened more to what he was saying was when I questioned how crazy what he actually said was. Then I questioned what part of his behavior exactly was too out-of-hand that the nurse thought that sedation was a viable option. Are the behaviors allowed by the ward those that resemble sanity, easiness, or conformity? The different ways I viewed this scene caused my existentialist approach to the film. What I learned from this about myself is that I feel more confused than ever about what sanity truly is but I suppose Existentialism would encourage me to keep posing difficult questions as there is no absolute truth, and construct values meaning from my own experiences. What I think I learned about society from my experience watching the film is that we often deem certain actions crazy when we cannot or do not understand them. It seems easier that way because it helps us keep some kind of common normalcy in our existences within a society. Though I wouldn’t consider myself a pure existentialist, I am fascinated by the idea of what ordinary people are potentially capable of doing. Could any of us become a Jeffrey Goines? What I found interesting was that the movie itself deals with the malleability of perception; what may seem crazy to one individual in one instant may actually be sane to another person

Open Document