Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book and movie comparison
A walk to remember movie summary essay
Book versus movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and movie comparison
Dipisha Patel
Principles of Cinematography
Essay Project: Storytelling Scene Analysis
March 4, 2014
For this project I selected A Walk to Remember written by Nicholas Sparks and directed by Adam Shankman. The cinematography was done by Julio Macat. The book was released in October 1999 while the movie premiered in 2002. At large the book and the movie tell the same story except for the period. The book is set in the 50’s but the movie was set in the mid 90’s to attract teenagers rather than alienate them. A Walk to Remember is about a girl named Jamie (Mandy Moore) and a boy named Landon (Shane West) who played the lead roles in the movie. The movie is a good interpretation of the movie as it captures the most important points with a few additional details. At large the movie illustrates the scenes described in the book well by showing how Landon transformed from a moody and reckless jock in high school to a loving and caring man. Like the book, the movie shows the scene with Jamie warning Landon to not fall in love with her. Jamie even reminds Landon to not fall in love with her when Landon confesses his love for her. When Landon finds out Jamie is terminally ill, he does everything he can to fulfill all her wishes until she passes away.
Although the book and the movie tell the same story at large, there are some scenes that are showed in the movie but are not mentioned in the book. One of the scenes in the movie was with Landon asking Jamie’s father who is a reverend to have faith in him in dating his daughter. Landon was asking for permission to date his daughter but the reverend initially refused because he was afraid Landon was going to hurt his daughter. The scene may have been added to the movie because the director may...
... middle of paper ...
...The scene was described in detail in the book as well but it did not convey the same emotional message as the movie did.
The preceding scene depicted how the rest of the movie was shot because in the beginning of the movie Jamie and Landon were distant. The focus in the beginning was more on the two as individuals than a couple. But as the story progressed, the camera’s focus started to gear toward the two as a couple. The telescope scene was important to develop the story as it marked the closeness of Jamie’s and Landon’s relationship. Overall the video transfer was crisp, displaying no avert signs of edge enhancement. Detailing was also good, and there were a range of views and shades to adjust and focus and lighting used throughout the movie. The picture quality seemed slightly soft and the colors were a bit mudded from the cinematography but not the transfer.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
The book has some things it only has, which supports the idea that the book and movie
The differences from the book to the movie are that in the book Dally never mentions that he hates kids so much as he does in the movie he saves kids from the church that's burning down. In the book he is
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
The first scene, which is a major focus of the film and the novel, is
...aid in the book that the maid died of exhaustion from running so it must have been a little bit larger than how the movie shot it. I pictured all of the characters differently but that is just personal opinions and everyone would have those.
..., the film portrayed the kids being overly whelmed with hatred when they received gifts from their parents. It was like they never knew their parents existed. Another example of the difference between the book and the movie is Mr. Freeman (mother’s boyfriend) was presented as being very reserved with the children. In the movie he was seen as warm, talkative, and friendly towards Maya and her brother. The film also showed Mr. Freeman’s manly behavior by confronting Vivian (Maya’s mother) at her job. However, in the book Mr. Freeman never left the house, he always sat and waited at home for her.
The film may have edited out one of the drastic details that made the novel’s success, explaining the film’s failure.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
Since both the movie and the book focus on that one line, they are both more similar than different.
A hero can be defined as the main character in a story, and as the following film elements discussed induce one to think – not to mention the movie’s title- , that Thelma and Louise are the two main characters of this story. Courage and noble acts are other characteristics that will also be taken in account in order to better support the argument that these two women are indeed the heroes of this story.
A Genetic Odyssey’ is an interesting movie to watch. There were many thoughts that passed my mind as I watched the movie. First of all, it was interesting to visualize the movie back in the day, assuming how one single man lived in Africa approximately sixty thousand years ago. It is quite amazing to have traced the records so far behind to find that Adam could be the father of homo sapiens after all. The better question arises when there are different sizes, races and shapes to each human being.