Mountaintop Removal Essay

1306 Words3 Pages

Mountaintop removal mining, a practice that was developed in the 1970s as an extension of surface strip mining, entails the removal of up to 800 vertical feet of a mountaintop or ridge in order to access deep coal seams. Practiced extensively in Southern Appalachia—primarily Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, and Tennessee—mountaintop removal is estimated to have impacted over 700,000 acres in the region (it is noteworthy that the 700,000 acre figure is based on coal company data, which geographers have claimed underestimates the actual extent of impact by as much as 40%).
The processes required for mountaintop removal include clear cutting, blasting, digging, waste dumping, processing of coal, and reclamation. Taken individually, each of these elements of mountaintop removal constitutes serious environmental harm. When considered in aggregate, the steps of mountaintop removal coalesce into a process that does irreparable damage to ecosystems and residential communities. Old-growth forests are clear-cut, killing wildlife and damaging the natural landscape. Ridges are blasted as little as 300 feet from homes and neighborhoods, frequently cracking wells and foundations. Digging machines, called draglines, are brought in, replacing the natural landscape with machines up to 22 stories tall. The removed rock and soil, dysphemistically called “spoil” or “overburden” by coal companies, is dumped into valleys, burying streams and further harming remaining wildlife. Mined coal is processed on-site, creating leaking ponds of sludge or slurry that further damage the water table.
There have been, in recent years, a number of media depictions of mountaintop removal, the affected communities, and activists standing in opposition to the prac...

... middle of paper ...

...ism ultimately, then, creates a world with almost no realism available for its inhabitants.
While Franzen employs realism, Freedom’s Walter Berglund is presented as a realist, as he tries to find a solution to the problem of extractive ecocide—“We can use mountaintop removal and reclamation to stop mountaintop removal!” Here, Franzen is clearly incorrect; the most basic fact about mountaintop removal is that there is no such thing as reclamation. “Reclamation” efforts certainly exist, but mountaintop removal entails such fundamental transformation of landscape that, “reclaimed” or not, what is left would require centuries to return to something that even remotely resembles what was. These harsh realities of mountaintop removal are, sadly, absent from Franzen’s realism just as they are absent from the growing cultural narrative surrounding mountaintop removal.

Open Document