Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What message is conveyed in freedom writers
What message is conveyed in freedom writers
The role of religion in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What message is conveyed in freedom writers
In the novel, “Ishmael,” Daniel Quinn introduces two groups of people with an apparent connection with Mother Culture; the Takers and Leavers of the world. Quinn’s intended purpose of introducing these two very distinct groups of people in “Ishmael” is to show an outsider’s perspective on the world’s captivity, the creation myth, and the fate of the world- all of which are often given by Mother Culture. The Takers and Leavers appear to have very different belief systems and methods. The Takers, for example, have their organized religion to tell their stories, while Leavers have their spirituality to tell their stories. As a Taker, one lives by being dependent on Mother Culture and the organized religion apparent in their culture. The basic …show more content…
As a Leaver, one is considered as part of the whole, similar to how a relationship is established. Focusing on faith and belief in one’s spirituality is important in the philosophy of the Leavers. Unlike the Takers who live off the basic foundations of structure and routine in regards to spirituality, the Leavers are able to explore and imagine in ways the Takers can’t, allowing room for fluctuation. Living under the hands of the gods, the Leavers are always given what they need and they leave the rest for others in the world because they will always have enough for they are provided for by the gods. The Takers, on the other hand, can’t live under the hands of the gods because they can’t even handle not having control over their possessions. Because of this, the Takers tend to ruin everything around them in some way and lower their accessibilities to their resources. The Leavers obviously keep to themselves, but when it’s necessary they help others. The world’s fate should have never ended up in the hands of its inhabitants, but with the destructive behaviors of the Takers, the fate of the world has come to be that
In the novel Ishmael, written by Daniel Quinn, the narrator has spent most of his life looking for a teacher so he can learn to save the world. When the narrator was reading the paper he found an ad searching for a student interested in saving the world. After arriving at the address he finds a gorilla named Ishmael, who communicates telepathically. (Quinn, 1995)
The narrator states, “my conditioning tells me-Mother Culture tells me-that living in the hands of the gods has got to be a never-ending nightmare of terror and anxiety” (227). This belief has led to catastrophic results like global warming, the extinction of animals, and the slow destruction of the Earth. The Takers’ cultural ideals lead them to believe that the gods restrict man to being in complete control, which places themselves equal to or above the gods. Ishmael, a self-proclaimed Leaver, refuses to accept this premise. He explains the main thing wrong with the Takers culture is that they support them acting against the world and that they don’t even realize it.
In the quote above, Ishmael is saying that the culture of the Takers is not so much lazy in its execution of civilization, but it is actually at war with the world. I agree with this statement because in the human culture, everything becomes competition to the point where extermination is the solution. Quinn writes, “Diversity is exactly what’s under attack here. Everyday dozens of species disappear as a direct result of the way the Takers compete outside the law” (Quinn 130). Due to mankind’s lust for competition, takers have abused the peacekeeping law which has inevitably decreased the amount of diversity among the community of life. This then causes a world where everyone is for themselves which then leads to an economically fragile society. Moreover, the author uses a
These moments of pure happiness inspire hope in the hearts of his characters. The Indians are able to find peace for just an instant holding onto it in a beautiful way that allows them to forget the strains of their lives. This psychological phenomenon is exhibited constantly throughout the collection of stories but Victor best embodies it when he remembers his father. He changes “[T]he memories. Instead of remembering the bad things, remember what happened immediately before. That’s what I learned from my father.” (page 34). Instead of remembering how his dad left him when he was young he savors the memory of him when he was there. By being able to be thankful for the days with his father Victor can make life without him less painful. Alexie shows through Victor’s use of this coping mechanism of thankfulness that Reservation Indians are happier with the little they have than the spoiled people of the rest of our country. This idea is clearly a positive and shows that Alexie’s realism is not all just the racist, stereotypical garbage that many claim it is. Instead it has actual meaning behind it; it is simply an examination of the Native American’s lifestyle and world-view
In Thomas King's short story "Borders," a Blackfoot mother struggles with maintaining her cultural heritage under the pressure of two dominating nations. Storytelling is important, both for the mother and for the dominant White society. Stories are used to maintain and pass on cultural information and customs from one generation to another. Furthermore, stories can be used both positively and negatively. They can trap individuals into certain ways of thinking, but they can also act as catalysts that drive social change within society.
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...
Watching the Amish riding their horse drawn carriages through Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, you catch a glimpse of how life would have been 150 years ago. The Amish, without their electricity, cars, and television appear to be a static culture, never changing. This, however, is just an illusion. In fact, the Amish are a dynamic culture which is, through market forces and other means, continually interacting with the enormously tempting culture of America. So, one might be led to wonder how a culture like the Amish, one that seems so anachronistic, has not only survived but has grown and flourished while surrounded by a culture that would seem to be so detrimental to its basic ideals. The Amish, through biological reproduction, resistance to outside culture, compromise, and a strong ethnic symbolism have managed to stave off a culture that waits to engulf them. Why study the Amish? One answer would be, of course, to learn about their seemingly pure cooperative society and value system (called Ordung). From this, one may hope to learn how to better America's problem of individualism and lack of moral or ethical beliefs. However, there is another reason to study the Amish. Because the Amish have remained such a large and distinct culture from our own, they provide an opportunity to study the effects of cultural transmission, resistance, and change, as well as the results of strong symbolism in maintaining ethnic and cultural isolation.
In both Golding's Lord of the Flies and Marquez's "I Only Came to Use the Phone" emerges what is more than a simplistic story but instead an avocation for the author's beliefs. These authors use several techniques such as plot and dialectical choice to exemplify their distaste for savagery. Both main characters, Ralph and Maria, transition from an individual in a new and isolated environment to a savage who is a part of this place. When looking at Golding and Marquez's techniques of influential plot and dialectal choice, one can determine that these methods of writing are used to advocate civility.
This essay has compared the differences between the societies in these two novels. There is one great similarity however that both make me thankful for having been born into a freethinking society where a person can be truly free. Our present society may not be truly perfect, but as these two novels show, it could be worse.
The colonization of civilizations has changed the world’s history forever. From the French, Spaniard, and down to the English, have changed cultures, traditions, religions, and livelihoods of other societies. The Native Americans, for example, were one of the many civilizations that were conquered by the English. The result was their ways of life based on nature changed into the more “civilized” ways of the colonists of the English people. Many Native Americans have lost their old ways and were pulled into the new “civilized” ways. Today only a small amount of Native American nations or tribes exist in remote areas surviving following their traditions. In the book Ceremony, a story of a man named Tayo, did not know himself and the world around him but in the end found out and opened his eyes to the truth. However the Ceremony’s main message is related not only to one man but also to everything and everyone in the world. It is a book with the message that the realization of oneself will open the eyes to see what is truth and false which will consequently turn to freedom.
Ishmael tells the narrator about Mother Culture, which tells a story that is so general, we usually do not notice it. The influences it has on the moments of everyone’s lives, however, is substantial. This story is really the relationship of humans, the world, and the gods we believe in. According to Ishmael, when we live according to a story we think is a reality, we are enacting it. The people enacting the story are what define the culture. Leavers are people who are typically in primitive cultures while takers are found in more civilized countries. Leavers are those who live on what they have, aware of the environment around them. Takers, on the other hand, will use, and sometimes ov...
On the hand of the Leavers, they are traditional people who follow what generations and generations have done before them and their knowledge gets passed down. However Takers push away old ways and make way for new ways which is described as cultural amnesia. Takers are a culture who repress memories, fail to remember or renounce things that came from their
Despite the Garden of Eden’s reputation of purity and freedom, it is the setting of the ultimate act of evil. This is true in “The Lord of the Flies”, with the acts of killing and savage tendencies the boys demonstrate. At what first appears to be a paradise, the conclusion of both stories is unfortunate.
Ruth Benedict’s anthropological book, Patterns of Culture explores the dualism of culture and personality. Benedict studies different cultures such as the Zuni tribe and the Dobu Indians. Each culture she finds is so different and distinctive in relation to the norm of our society. Each difference is what makes it unique. Benedict compares the likenesses of culture and individuality, “A culture, like an individual, is a more or less consistent pattern of thought or action” (46), but note, they are not the same by use of the word, “like.” Benedict is saying that figuratively, cultures are like personalities. Culture and individuality are intertwined and dependent upon each other for survival.
In Ishmael, Ishmael talks a lot about captivity. He says that it is his area of expertise as he has spent his whole life in captivity. Ishmael states this, “Mother Culture has taught you to have a horror of the life you put behind you with your revolution.” (Quinn 132). The “revolution” being the agricultural revolution. Here Ishmael i saying that Mother Culture has created fear between us, us being the human civilization, and the old, better ways of life. Therefor putting us in the “prison” of living by modern terms, which Ishmael says are bad.