Motives for the proposed acquisition
If our company acquires Morrison, shareholders could benefit from synergy. Hillier (2013) states that synergy occurs when the acquisition makes the value of the combined firm greater than the sum of the value of the acquiring and acquired firm. There are mainly following three resources of synergies.
1. Revenue enhancement
Firstly, Morrison could bring a higher market gain through improving media programming, distribution network and balancing product mix. In 2014, Morrison has launched an advertisement campaign through many TV channels and websites which brings a good public image. Secondly, we could mitigate our weakness in distribution by taking advantage of Morrison‘s nationwide distribution network which is made up with 8 major distribution centers. In addition, Morrison could also help us to alter our portfolio of products because it provides a wide range of grocery, fresh foods and alcoholic products. Finally, since Morrison and our company are in the same sector, it is horizontal acquisition which could reduce competition we are currently facing to and strengthen monopoly benefits.
2. Cost reduction
According Hillier (2013), a horizontal acquisition could increase operating efficiency through economies of scale. Generally, the cost per unit is relate to the size of production, a company would experiences economies of scale in which the cost per unit decrease with an increase of production size until it reaches the optimal firm size and after that diseconomies of scale will show up. Furthermore, we could share same central facilities such as computer systems, corporate headquarters and management which could reduce the management costs. A lower operating and management costs could miti...
... middle of paper ...
... also future prediction.
These valuations are just estimation and there is no absolutely right valuing method.
Time value of money needs to be considered, so need to discount the future value to present value.
DCF model could be the basic valuation, other valuing method, like Market Multiples should be considered to make result more accurate.
If there are significant difference between DCF and other method, the assumptions and predictions should be reconsidered.
The difference between the EV without synergy and with synergies could give us an purchasing price boundary when we negotiate with the target company.
Since we believe the share price of Morrison might be undervalued and we now cannot afford the risk of paying large amount of cash, stock exchange might the best method of financing. But negotiated exchange ratio has to be based on synergies.
Have you ever been transported in time and space? The book, Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry, transports you to the nineteen thirties in the Deep South. In this book cotton fields fill the landscape and the tension of being an African American family I the south fills every page. The author, Mildred D. Taylor, tells the story of Cassie Logan, a young girl and her family. The character, Mr. L. T. Morrison, was a co-worker of Cassie’s father, David, and later worked for him. Over time, he became a part of the Logan family. Mr. L. T. Morrison is an admirable character in Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry, because he helps defend the family, he is hard on the outside but soft on the inside, and is a strong man.
The second section will be a report to the board of directors that identifies a synergistic acquisition candidate for Target. This section will identify Target's proposed acquisition terms, price, financing, and potential negotiation strategies. This segment will also include price / earnings ratios, book value, current market value, and liquidation based on the supporting financial data. Also in this part will be a discussion of the general and specific risks inherent in an acquisition strategy.
Theoretically, it is the foundation of simpleness and reasoning for stock valuation as any cash payoff from company is entirely in form of dividends. However, in practice, this model require further hypothesis on company’ dividend payments, future interest rate and growth pattern. Therefore, it is assumed that the DDM model merely applies to evaluate roughly minor proportion of the value of company’ share price. Specifically, the JB HI-FI value obtained from the DDM is 30.65 higher than their actual currently trading share price 24.1; a different of 6.55, and then the stock is undervalued. Consequently, DMM is not applicable for stock price valuation in case of JB HI-FI since it is not an individual approach of stock
Berry, A. W. (2010, May 31). Advantages and disadvantages of acquisitions and mergers. Retrieved from http://www.helium.com/items/1561489-mergers-and-acquisitions
There are many valuation methods that could be used to evaluate this company. Finding a method that valuates the stand-alone value is difficult. The stand-alone value should be dependent upon the firm’s own assets and projected future income. We decided to evaluate this company based upon two methods: The Discounted Cash Flow Method and the Comparable Companies Method.
The objective of this report is to give an overall view on research and analysis to regards of two companies, Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc and Tesco Plc that I have chosen for. In this report, I will be comparing two companies’ financial analysis based on their comprehensive income and balance sheet for one year; and also will be comparing their generating cash ability, cash management and financial adaptability based on statement of cash flows for the past two year and also determine whether the two companies have the ability to repay their debts to their creditors, generating into cash and going concern which related to finance.
In conclusion, time is money and knowing investment options, interest rates, and the formation of calculations of both present and future value as I have learnt in this class, will be a great deal of help both now and in the future. “Time is money”. The value of money right now the same as it will be in the future and vice versa. So this is to encourage us that we should know the appropriate investment of money in other to differentiate between the worth of investments that offer us returns at different times.
Discounted cash flow is a valuation technique that discounts projected cash inflows and outflows to evaluate the potential value of an investment. There are three discounted cash flow methods: Net Present Value (NPV), Profitability Index (PI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The net present value discounts all cash inflows and outflows at a minimum rate of return, which is usually the cost of capital. The profitability index refers to the ratio of the present value of cash inflow to the present value of cash outflows. The internal rate of return refers to the interest rate that discounts cash inflow projections to the present to ensure that the present value of cash inflows is equivalent to the present value of cash outflows (Brown, 1992).
Time value of money (TVM) is a monetary concept that is very important to all parts of the financial world. This concept basically says that $100 today is worth more than $100 a year from now (or anytime in the future). Also, an individual should earn some value of compensation for not spending their money. This compensation is essentially called the interest that will be earned on the initial cash. What about when an individual opts to receive money in the future rather than today? That can lead to problems. This is because they are taking a gamble by loaning money- since there is almost always risk in loaning money. A couple of these risks include inflation and default risk. Default risk means that the person who borrowed the money does not repay the money to the person that loaned it. Inflation means that the general prices of products will rise. How does all this work? In theory the person that gets the $100 today could invest it, even at a very low annual percentage rate (APR), and still come out ahead. If they invest it at 2% APR, they would have $102 at the end of one year. Th...
In the horizontal integration, the company product range is from a wide clientele. That is they sell product either clothing or luxurious foods from different manufacturers. These give them the edge since the products they offer a variety for the customers to choose from, and hence they can shop less than one roof (Cole, 1997). In the vertical integration strategy, the firm will deal substantial with products from a single supplier and M&S gets the exclusive rights to deal with the product and its supply to the market. This is necessary when the company aim is to serve an identified target market which is exclusive and has the potential to sustain and grow the company substantively. These employ a tar...
“the most prominent pro-competitive effect of a vertical integration is the elimination of pre-merger double marginalization which arises when both the upstream and downstream markets exhibit some degree of economic market power, and thus firms at each level mark up their prices above marginal cost” (Meyer and Wang, 2011).
In the recent past, Tesla has been noted as a great competitor in the automotive industry. This is attributed to its three huge competitive advantages. Generally, the advantage lies in its ability to bring about innovative disruption in the industry. This include; a strong battery supply chain that is sustainable in itself, a supercharger network celebrated by the customers and a software system several leagues ahead of its competitors (Zach, 2015).
Poor organizational management, failure to innovate and adapt to the environment, and an outdated brand image have all contributed to Sears massive decline. By not setting a clear organizational strategy, executives of Sears strayed away from innovation, allowing for competitors to attract Sears loyal customers to their organization. In addition, the outdated brand image of Sears has failed to meet the ever changing customers of today’s society. Overall, there are many reasons that have led to the downfall of a once powerful retail giant.
Value indication is based on TTM EBITDA of $207mm at 7.6 times (multiple is per Jan 2015 NYU Stern study based on 56 global E&C business). Backing out