Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good and evil in literature
Good and evil in literature
Morality in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Good and evil in literature
Reputation plays a blinding role in separating evil from good. Based on society’s depiction of ideals, the nature of man is looked past, constituting morality through the lens of societal construct. While civilization opposes savagery, each individual houses the duality of good and evil – evil being the domineering force. In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, evil men masquerade behind their reputation in society, while self-perception allows ego to override moral bounds. Without societal input in configuring our moral compass, we lose the ability to navigate our two sides, turning to a primitive state; an innate evil.
In the heart of those we venerate, there is a place for evil. Pumped into it are the forces of evil that we do not see physically, as one’s reputation masks the malicious mind. Heart of Darkness presents Kurtz’s reputation and the way the characters within the novella see him. He is placed above many in the social hierarchy, and receives an almost Godly admiration from others, “‘Ah, so they talk of him down there,’ he murmured to himself. Then he began again assuring me that Mr. Kurtz was the best agent he had, an exceptional man of the greatest importance of the company.” (Conrad 32). Throughout the novella, Marlow is told of Kurtz’s reputation, though he has yet to meet him. The speaker in this text reinforces Kurtz’s reputation that has already been built up prior to Marlow’s arrival in the Congo. In the Congo, however, Kurtz’s race already puts forth a social dominance over the Natives. White people are seen as superior, which is cultural perception, nonetheless. Thus, Kurtz being white automatically gives him a reputation of righteous...
... middle of paper ...
...ng, but when they isolate themselves from the laws of society, which forms in us a moral code, we turn to a darker side that gives into selfish desires, which show we are innately evil and it is society that rights us from this.
Society organizes what is good and what is evil. Without it, we are lost. In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, society teaches good and evil, and without societal input, we turn to a primitive state of evil. Reputation conceals the evil that is prevalent in the world, and ultimately, self-attainment buries moral conduct. People are inherently evil. Without the socialization of different institutions that teach us values, the evil within takes precedence over our soul. Moral bankruptcy is replaced within us, when we are isolated from society’s control of our lives.
The world roughly hold about seven billion people. People from different backgrounds, nationality, race, but there is a high percentage of people in this world that struggle to make moral decisions on their own because they are scared of becoming an outcast, an enemy. In addition, this cycle causes people to be controlled by the society and not make decisions that would possibly better them but rather turn them into the society’s robot. In essays such as, “‘Repent Harlequin’ Said the Ticktock Man” and “Shooting an Elephant,” written by Harlan Ellison and George Orwell, respectively, each character faces a conflict with themselves by not using their own moral sense and getting faced with challenges. In the essay “Civil Disobedience,” written
Society teaches both good and evil without realizing that they are corrupting In the novel Ender's Game, Orson Scott Card uses Peter, Ender, and several symbols to strengthen his theme of the duality of human nature to show that humans are not pure good or pure evil – they are a combination of both.
Many people have different views on the moral subject of good and evil or human nature. It is the contention of this paper that humans are born neutral, and if we are raised to be good, we will mature into good human beings. Once the element of evil is introduced into our minds, through socialization and the media, we then have the potential to do bad things. As a person grows up, they are ideally taught to be good and to do good things, but it is possible that the concept of evil can be presented to us. When this happens, we subconsciously choose whether or not to accept this evil. This where the theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke become interesting as both men differed in the way they believed human nature to be. Hobbes and Locke both picture a different scene when they express human nature.
The question “What makes us who we are?” has perplexed many scholars, scientists, and theorists over the years. This is a question that we still may have not found an answer to. There are theories that people are born “good”, “evil”, and as “blank slates”, but it is hard to prove any of these theories consistently. There have been countless cases of people who have grown up in “good” homes with loving parents, yet their destiny was to inflict destruction on others. On the other hand, there have been just as many cases of people who grew up on the streets without the guidance of a parental figure, but they chose to make a bad situation into a good one by growing up to do something worthwhile for mankind. For this reason, it is nearly impossible to determine what makes a human being choose the way he/she behaves. Mary Shelley (1797-1851) published a novel in 1818 to voice her opinions about determining personality and the consequences and repercussions of alienation. Shelley uses the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau to make her point. Rousseau proposed the idea that man is essentially "good" in the beginning of life, but civilization and education can corrupt and warp a human mind and soul. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (hereafter referred to as Frankenstein), Victor Frankenstein’s creature with human characteristics shows us that people are born with loving, caring, and moral feelings, but the creature demonstrates how the influence of society can change one’s outlook of others and life itself by his reactions to adversity at “birth”, and his actions after being alienated and rejected by humans several times.
We would like to believe that humans are inherently good at heart, yet with all the tragic and horrific events going on in the world, this thought seems like a childish fantasy or dream. What if it were the opposite of what we would like to believe, and that people are evil inside, and society is just structured to hold the evil in? Without a society, Thomas Hobbes believed there would be “war... of every man against every man,” and that life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Beck et al, 195). Lord of the Flies suggests that man is inherently evil, and this shows through when society crumbles, just like the conch breaking on the island.
Humans are inherently evil in nature and without law will unknowingly let this vile aspect of their own person be revealed. The depravity of actions in humans is expressed in William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, by a group of English boys that are stranded on an island, and disconnected from society. The fear from violation of laws that holds people to their morals and rationality in their society vanishes, and a growth of savagery is present in all the boys. Savagery, an element innate to humanity, can only be repressed by the laws of society; the lack of regulation removes all inhibition, and therefore, exposes the beast representing evil from within.
In conclusion, society imposes social norms to make humans calculable. Nietzsche states that this idea relates to the idea of rendering people predictable, which in turn allows them to make and keep promises. However, with this idea of humanity becoming predictable, a herd mentality is adopted. When someone is outside of this herd or doesn’t fit into the “social straitjacket,” they feel guilt for not conforming, and this guilt serves to “keep them in line.” Society falls into a routine of production, consumption, and then death, since this is what is presented as normal and good. This routine is oppressive and it internalizes man’s natural instincts, but that is the sacrifice that one has to make in order to be a part of what is now considered modern civilization.
With all that said, agreeing with William Golding is most logical. Humans possess evil in them but society, rules, laws, orders, and morals aids individuals to avoid corruption. Without the law, it is most likely that individuals will do selfish things and become corrupt rather than transform into an ideal person with the need of only to survive. Golding’s Lord of the Flies is an extreme but great representation of the human nature.
This author believes that humans strive to maintain goodness but our prideful desire for power leads us to take the shortest route to gratification. Divergent demonstrates both our ability to do right and our inability to sustain goodness without strong restraints on our desires. This is why societies must maintain rules and punishments in order to try to sustain our goodness for as long as possible.
Society is inevitable. It will always be there as a pleasure and a burden. Society puts labels on everything such as good or bad, rich or poor, normal or aberrant. Although some of these stamps are accurate, most are misconceptions. In Mary Shelley's, Frankenstein, this act of erring by society is extremely evident. Two of the most inaccurate assumptions of society revolve around the central characters, Dr. Frankenstein and the monster. Society's labels for these two extremely different characters are on the exact opposite side of the scale of what they truly are. Dr. Frankenstein is more of a monster while the monster is more humane.
One’s morals set in place the actions they see as proper and improper in their current society. Individuals in the same socioeconomic settings tend to overlap and correspond to each other. Other times morals are nonexistent or different due to one’s upbringing and culture, this means that ‘appropriate’ decisions as seen by some people may be seen as ‘inappropriate’ to others. Evil in terms of morals can be defined as someone 's morals being so extreme or nonexistent when compared to those of modern society 's views that they can not be logically comprehended.
How does absence of society bring out the true character of a person? “After reading … R.M. Ballantynes adventure story, The coral Island”,(hurn 1) Golding wondered if it would be a good idea to write about how the characters would really act. This is when William gonding decided to write “An allegory of man, Golding's Lord of the Flies presents the evil that man is capable of by nature.” (Hurn 1). Therefore, students should read this book to understand the innate dark side of human nature.
Life is a series of events controlled by awareness. Depending on what a person has or has not been exposed to influences his/her decisions. Whether good or bad depends on how one interprets the information presented. Throughout the stories “Young Goodman Brown” written by Nathaniel Hawthorne and “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” written by Ursula Le Guin, we tangle with the concepts of good or bad. With the aid of compelling imagery, symbols and metaphors, the stories are brought to life. Both stories depict good and evil, choices, morals and deception, in a way which could be related to our society today. It is safe to say that in some way, moral and immoral behavior exists in all of us, it just depends on which of the two awareness pricks
The word evil is find on the dictionary as wicked, sinful, bad, likely to cause trouble. On the other hand, good has a meaning of beneficial, honest, noble and pure. In society, evil and good mean different things to each person, what is holy for one person is damaging for another. Historical fact that establishes that humanity’s evilness is part of their nature as human being, people born with abomination. Experiments as the Milgram and the Stanford prison experiments show the wickedness of the society. Indeed the Lord of the Flies by William Golding brings to light the theme of evilness versus good. What makes this novel attractive is a group of boy, trying to survive on an island making effort to live with civilization to avoid the war in the group. As the time approaches the behavior and the real personality of each one of theme reveals itself. As in each one of the experiment there is a chief, in the novel, Jack is a leader that takes advantage of his authority to have control over the other boys. Above all, for some people in society evilness is learn from the people. In contrast, evidence attests that evilness triumphs over good.
‘It is from society and not from the individual that morality derives’ (Durkheim 1974: 61). According to Emile Durkheim ‘morality begins with the membership and life of a group…and that society creates all moral codes, not individuals’ (Durkheim 1974: 37). He stated that an individual cannot exist without society or deny it, without denying himself. Zygmunt Bauman however disagrees and believes morality is a pre-social impulse and therefore does not originate in society. In this essay I will first explore Durkheim’s theory of morality. I will then interrogate Durkheim’s claim that moral values come from society and are solely directed towards society by examining Bauman’s critique of his theory exemplified in ‘Modernity and the Holocaust’(Bauman 1989). Furthermore I will explore Bauman’s use of Weber as a form of advancement towards his critique of Durkhemian theory of morality and the ‘civilising process’. Lastly I will also explore Bauman’s change in ideas after writing ‘Modernity and the Holocaust’ by examining his new way of thinking exemplified in one of his most famous works ‘Liquid Modernity’. This essay will set out to challenge and evaluate critiques and conflicting theories from both Durkheim and Bauman as social theorists, and critically examine opposing ideologies.