Monster Culture Essay Thesis

Monster Culture

In the first thesis, the author speaks of the vampire’s body as that which lies in fear, desire anxiety and fantasy. He suggests that it should be killed by driving a stake through its heart that will stick it to the ground. The monster, as it is being referred to be pure culture and symbolizes something and not just itself. The thought of killing the vampires can be related to monster movies we watch where they are killed using the stake but never die. Some of them even claim to be five hundred years!

The second thesis gives a reason as to why the monster always escapes. It always creates damage then turns immaterial before vanishing only to reappear somewhere else. Killing the monster as many times as possible never really eliminates it, it always reappears as King Arthur did to the monster of Mount Saint Michael. The monster reappeared in a heroic way and destroyed the alien that stalked her. The monsters body is in a corporal and incorporeal form that is the threat to the propensity to move. Each time it reappears it speaks of a new life. In all vampire stories the undead returns in a bit different clothing and each time it is read against contemporary social movements or a specific determining event.

The third thesis states that the monster always escapes because it does not want to be categorized.

Monsters are disturbing hybrids whose bodies do not want to be included in any systematic structuration. The monster is, therefore, dangerous. It always appears at times of crisis as kind of the third term that creates more problems. The power to avoid and undermine has run through the monsters blood since the classic times. The monster also resists any classification built on hierarchy or just binary opposition and instead demands a system that allows mixed response and resistance to integration. The geography of a monster is wide and always full of cultural debate that can never be

completed.

In the fourth thesis, the monster is viewed as culturally different. It threatens to destroy individual members of the society and the cultural apparatus where individuality is contained and allowed. This is due to revealing its difference as arbitrary and potentially free-floating. The thought sounds scary. Monsters invading us right now and destroying our beliefs is not even possible.

The fifth thesis shows the monster resisting capture. The monsters declare that curiosity is more often punished than awarded. They also declare that one is better off safe in their domestic sphere than abroad away from people’s watchful eyes. An example is given of Lycaon, who tried to kill the head of their gods in his sleep. He was caught and punished by being transformed into a monster of the lawless, godless state to which his actions would bring back humanity. This is not experienced in our world today. In today’s world, punishment is fair and just by a court of law.

The fear of the monster is a desire is the next thesis. It is continually associated with forbidden practices to be normal and administer. It also attracts. The creatures who instill fear and terror can also escape when faced with a constraint. The monster is distrusted, but it has its own freedom. The habitations of the monsters are dark and full of uncertainty of the danger that lies there. Monsters become uncomplicated in their use and manufacture like the demons that haunt Sir Bors. The monster is the objected bit that leads to the formation of personal, national, cultural, economic, sexual, psychological and universal. However, the real question can be if they exist.

The seventh thesis depicts monsters as part of human beings. They can be isolated in far geographical borders from us, but they will always come back. They come back with more knowledge both self and human. They challenge us to re-evaluate our cultural assumptions about race, gender, sexuality and our tolerance towards its expression. They question why they exist in us.

WORK Cited

Cohen J. Monster culture (seven theses)