Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mongols’ effects on China
Effect of Mongol rule
Effect of Mongol rule
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mongols’ effects on China
Based on the lecture, there are two main nature and characteristics of modernity: Modern Age started from an invention of sophisticated hemispheric network of interchange and communication. Meanwhile, the productivity in this hemispheric community should expand enormously. For example, the supply of food and other useful commodities must increase to a certain extent. According to these two key features of modernity, the debate about whether the Modern Age begins with the creation of Mongol Empire has attracted lots of people’s attention and the answer to this question is various base on their educational background and culture. In my opinion, I don’t think the Modern Age starts from the Mongol Empire because it used to destruct the giant conquered …show more content…
land rather than promote it. Although between 12th and 13th century, the Mongol tribes conquered the biggest land in human history, which spanned 6000 miles and covered more than 12 million square miles (16% of the Earth’ total land), it destroyed many irrigation systems that restrict agriculture in many regions they invaded. It is true that Mongol Empire encouraged long-distance travel and trade among more than 100 million populations, which stimulate the network communication, however, many areas suffer the economic difficulties and the production in these places were effected negatively, especially agriculture. Collectively, the Mongol Empire didn’t increase the production among its territory so that I don’t agree the claim that it starts the Modern Age. If I was a 13th century European diplomat and was sent to the land of Mongols to collect their knowledge and history, I would complete a report briefly introduce the stories and influences of this great Empire.
Generally speaking, Mongols are group of nomadic people who have strong loyalties to kinship and families, while Chinggis Khan was a great leader not only united nearly all small clans in the central Asia, but also achieved the conquest of Persia and North China, who finally built the largest empire of the world in the human history. By making alliances with powerful Mongol leader and mastering in diploma strategies, he gradually brought all the Mongol tribes into a united confederation without mass military actions. His creative policies greatly strengthened both Mongol people and arms. As I interviewed some Mongol citizens, they told me that Chinggis Khan symbolized a kind of Mongol authority higher than clan or tribe by breaking up them and forcing men join certain army military rather than tribal groups. In addition, he chooses soldiers and officers based on their talents and skills rather than which clans they belong to. By complementing serials policies, Mongol army and society become most united than ever with strong military power. After Chinggis Khan united the Mongols in short time, he drew his attention to central Asia, Tibet, Persia, and northern China. Before his death in 1227, he finally built a mighty and vast Empire, which reached form northern China to Persia with over 12 million square miles. In my opinion, I think Chinggis Khan is a great conqueror, diplomatist, and a genius military leader because he successfully beat so many enemies and conquer such a big land. However, he is not a good administrator for he doesn’t know how to properly regulate a big Empire so that the Mongol Empire doesn’t last very long and most area is separated in a
century. As for the the role that the Mongols played with regards to Eurasian trade and cultural integration, they promote interaction among people of different area and connected Eurasian lands more closely than ever by stimulating long distances travel and trade through the whole Empire. I even met Marco Polo, who was a visitor from Italy working as a government officer for Mongol Empire in China. The Mongol rulers value the importance of communication for their vast Empire, so they effectively encourage facilitated trade, missionary efforts, diplomatic travel, and movements of peoples to new lands. In addition, they also made great effort to guard trade routes and keep security issues so that merchants can increase more commercial investments and long distance trade across the whole Empire. I can find various spicy ingredients and silk in Europe which are imported from Asia. It is the first time that China and western Europe linked together because any individual can travel across the entire Eurasian landmass safely. In the culture aspect, Mongols tolerated all cultural and religious tradition in any area in the Empire no matter the places were conquered before or not. For example, Christianity, Confucianism, Buddhism, Islam, and Persian culture were all allowed in Mongol Empire so that the communication and assimilation between different cultures were quite normal at this moment. On the other hand, the Mongols also made priority for magic and super natural powers, which is connected to their native shamanist cults. Meanwhile, some Khans are also recognized as the incarnations of the Buddha because they also find Lamaist Buddhism attractive, especially to the legitimate rulers. When I traveled in the Persian land controlled by the Mongols now, I found that Persians can still serve as ministers, governors, or officials as long as in lower levels. Meanwhile, they only need to hand in tax receipts and maintained order to rule their land and religions and traditions are all free without any restriction. Some Mongols even some kind of join into Muslim Persian society by assimilating to Persian cultural and Islam religion. It seems the Mongols themselves haven’t influence Persians culture or tradition very deep. However, in economic fields, Persian suffers financial difficulties brought by Mongols’ excessive spending strained the treasure, and overexploitation of the peasantry, which negatively affect the revenue. The government financial budget is so huge that it is nearly possible to develop economy. That’s why Mongols have serious problems governing Persia and collapse in quiet short time. On the other hand, Mongols implement contract policies toward China. For example, they prohibit the marriage between Mongols and Chinese and outlawed learning Chinese language. Using Chinese people to rule themselves is not allowed in the Mongols’ policy, however, administrator form other area is supported such as Persians or Arabs. Meanwhile, they also restrict Chinese traditions and culture by ending the privilege of Confucian scholars, especially its influence among official systems. I also notice that Mongol ruler are not capable to regulate social economics in ancient China, the monetary policy is in totally mass and people don’t trust paper money authorized by government at all. The financial difficulties and factional divisions brought by Mongols seriously damage Chinese social productivity. In conclusion, Chinggis Khan is the great leader and conqueror, who is also the founder of the largest empire in the human history - Mongol Empire. The Mongol rulers encourage long distance travel and communication among different area from eastern China to western Persia, which effectively contribute to the whole country’s inter connections and mutual influence. However, they cause serious financial problem and damage to the agriculture in many places, which decrease the productivity in the society. Based on these facts, I don’t think the Modern age start from the Mongol Empire.
The Mongols were a group of nomadic people who were known for not only their ferocity in battle but also their tolerance of other cultures. Over the course of their many empires, the Mongols conquered lands from as far as the Korean peninsula to the Islamic civilizations of the Middle East. The movement of the Mongol people into these areas was met with mixed opinions, as members of some societies respected the braveness of the Mongols while others saw them as destructive. According to Ala-ad-Din Ata-Malik Juvaini, 15th century Korean scholars, and Rashid al-Din, the Mongols were a group of tolerant people who attempted to eradicate injustice and corruptness (1,3,4). However, members of other societies viewed the Mongols as coldhearted and merciless because of the damage they dealt in the conquest of Russian cities and the taxes they forced upon their conquered societies (1,2). Nonetheless, some scholars and historians recognized the Mongols power and braveness, but were indifferent with their views of the Mongol civilization.
Firstly, they were taught and trained from a very young age. All men over the age of fourteen were expected to undertake military duty (DOC B). By training their soldiers so young, by the time they were ready to fight, they were amazingly fast and strong which helped to conquer other lands. Second, the Mongols were very well organized which helped with communication. Organization flourished under Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongols, control because he instituted new rules. For example, “Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten men should be organized in such a way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten” (DOC C). By instituting standardized methods and rules of battle to create organization, they were able to work together, as one, as a team. Everybody was on the same page, and nobody left people behind and fled. This organization united them and brought them to move like each other, learn from one another. Lastly, the Mongols were always prepared, another characteristic that added to why they were able to conquer so much land. When soldiers are prepared, they can be confident and brave. The Mongol army needed that advantage. So soldiers were equipped for travel. They were expected to carry cooking pots, dried meat, a water bottle, files for sharpening arrows, a needle ad thread and other
...s misused their common material interest to overcome the political fault diving them, while giving up political unity they had conserved a combined cultural and commercial empire. The connection that the Mongol Empire relied on was the quick and constant motion of people, goods, and information around the empire.
Mongol empire was the largest land empire of the world has ever seen. First began as a nomadic group of tribes. Mongols were united and emerged into an empire that conquered lands stretching from Europe to Central Asia under the rule of Genghis Khan. The Mongol empire was able to succeed in expanding, and conquering was due to their ability to adapt to any living conditions, their sheer brutality force, and their strong military organization.
The Mongols are one of the biggest motorcycle gangs and organized crime groups. This writer will examine the Mongols criminal activity to prove that they are an organized crime group. This will be done through the examination of the group’s involvement in racketeering, murder, guns, drugs, and assault.
When the word “Mongol” is said I automatically think negative thoughts about uncultured, barbaric people who are horribly cruel and violent. That is only because I have only heard the word used to describe such a person. I have never really registered any initial information I have been taught about the subject pass the point of needing and having to know it. I felt quite incompetent on the subject and once I was given an assignment on the book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Age, I was very perplexed for two reasons. One I have to read an outside book for a class that already requires a substantial amount of time reading the text, and secondly I have to write a research paper in History. I got over it and read the book, which surprisingly enough interested me a great deal and allow me to see the Moguls for more than just a barbaric group of Neanderthals, but rather a group of purpose driven warriors with a common goal of unity and progression. Jack Weatherford’s work has given me insight on and swayed my opinion of the Mongols.
The Mongols were also known for their surprise attack which spread to other armies, making it a keen warfare used all around the world. This battle tactic consisted of a group of men who are fighting out on the battlefield and they begin to retreat only to draw the enemy into a trap. The enemy runs into a rain of arrows as the rest of the men are hiding off to the side with loaded weapons, and fierce ground fighters ready for combat. This is one key that the Mongols had to help them conquer Asia. Lastly, the Mongols had a positive impact on the world because they united most of Asia.
The Mongols; a vicious and destructive military force, feared throughout its empire and under the rule of one man, Chinggis Khan. This picture of the Mongols and their empire is one often painted by our modern society. However, much of what we think we know about the Mongols has been exaggerated and biased from the point of view of the people that were conquered. In reality, the Mongols, although at times violent and destructive, bore many similarities in tactics and practices to the classical empires that had preceded them. They were not just simple barbaric savages looking to destroy whatever they could. They were a people united for a common purpose, trying to achieve it the same way that prior civilizations had done so: military force. Even though a Western perspective may find the actions of the Mongols objectionable, it must be understood that this was not a Western society, nor did it house the same values as one. The Mongols were not the destructive barbarians they are often made out to be, but rather an effective military force working for unification.
In the 13th century BC, the Mongols rose to power and conquered an empire whose size still has yet to matched. The Mongols conquered lands such as China, leaving such a lasting influence on them that their legacy still lives on. However, despite the Mongols success, their actions have left a constantly ongoing debate on whether they were barbarians, seen and portrayed by different societies of their time as people with no morale or modern civilities, or civilized people who were just feared by other societies. Although the Mongols are generally now seen as Barbarians because of their violent and barbaric war tactics they used to instill fear in people, they are actually civilized because they had a strategically organized army, and because they were accepting of the customs of other peoples. These two elements would eventually lead them to their success.
"History & Culture of Russia / The Mongols and the Emergence of Moscow." History & Culture of
When Westerners such as ourselves and people native to Europe are asked what they know of the Mongols the answer is usually ruthless barbarians intent upon world domination. After all these years you would expect that the educational points presented to the different generations in school would have given a different view of the Mongol civilization. Leaving this vision instilled upon generation after generation is detrimental to learning the different positive aspects left behind by such a powerful empire. The nomadic lifestyle that the Mongols endured empowered them to become hardy warriors. The Mongols began their conquests in response to Ghengis Khans personal missions as well as a disruption in trade and the ecology of the land upon which they inhabited.
Over the years there have been many great nomadic groups, such as the Vikings and the Kievan, but no nomadic group has been more successful than the Mongols. The Mongols have had many lasting influences on Russia, China, and even Europe. The Mongols have left a mark on the European trading systems in technologies as well as in their trading systems trade routes. One thing that stayed the same throughout Europe was their many religion.
Both the glorious empires, the Mali established in 1230 by the founder Sundiata and Mongol founded by Genghis Khan in 1206 contain much more differences than similarities. When the rise of the Mali and Mongol Empires began to arise they had significant effects towards the areas in which they were located. Some similarities include religious tolerance and cultural growth by trade. Some differences include violence methods and religion. Even though both of these superlative empires arose in difference regions they shared some common views as well.
In the West, Genghis Khan and the Mongol tribe are often presented as brutal savages who wiped out entire cultures, destroyed cities and killed many people. While these accounts are true, there was certainly more to the Mongol empire than sheer brutality. Many of the practices that Genghis Khan put into place were responsible for the successes of the Mongol Nation. With an ability to adapt and innovate, Genghis Khan became known as the world’s greatest conqueror and is still revered in many countries today. Temujin, who later took the name Genghis Khan, came from humble beginnings which helped to form the foundations of the type of leader he became later in life.
Today, in the 21st century, historians all over the world continue to study ancient civilizations. Archaeologists have found a lot of evidence of ancient civilizations existence that could help to reveal mysteries of the ancient world. Earliest civilizations go through the complex processes of survival, social adaptation and cultural development. Ancient civilizations flashed like stars in the horizon of history, than evolved and flourished, and then destroyed after certain period of time. But they left incredible knowledge of material and spiritual cultures for future generations. Considering the details of origins of ancient civilizations such as ancient Egypt and Greek through the history, modern people could see growth and decline of their cultures, values and scientific achievements which influenced the development of contemporary world.