Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A Passage to India by Em Forster Critical Analysis
Indian emotions vs British literalism in a passage to India by E M Forster
Passage to india by em forster analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A Passage to India by Em Forster Critical Analysis
Modernism in Forster's A Passage to India
When considering the novels of E.M. Forster, it is natural to recall the reserved landscapes of the Merchant and Ivory cinematic versions. Gauzy images - green hills, languorous boat rides, tender embraces - these impressions, cousins, really, to Jane Austen's plots and settings, are remembered as period pieces seldom associated with the literary experimentation of Virginia Woolf or the winsome angst of the lost War poets. It seems - does it not? - the movies end happily with the appropriate pairing of couples. But Forster should not be lumped in with representative Edwardian literature or with cinematic bliss. In order to analyze the worth of Forster's literary contribution, our impressions of the films must be put aside so that the text's echo can rattle in our ears.
And once the mediums are pried apart and banished to separate corners, a novel like A Passage to India stands alone and can be admired for its complex study of people who interact in an unfamiliar landscape, a landscape that ignores humans entirely. This text is not about good breeding, dowries, or happy endings. With its multiple perspectives, fragile personal connections, and symbolic caves that house an echo of nothingness not every character can hear, A Passage to India is Forster's own quiet rendition of Modernism. He does not try, as do Woolf, Joyce, and Eliot, to break free from standard English fictive forms. Instead, Forster's text contains an innovative, urgent assertion that the core of things like love, friendship, and self-knowledge are perpetually capable of collapsing, yet are valuable in spite of their fragility. His work demonstrates the individual's need to connec...
... middle of paper ...
...nd Joyce are not directly present in A Passage to India, and while Forster's fictive structure might not be as experimental as theirs, his novel stands shoulder to shoulder with other modernists who in a little flash of light detect hidden glimmers beneath the stacks of words that comprise the universal story, the self-deception, the quiet conversation with a friend in a moonlit mosque.
Works Cited
Forster, E.M. A Passage to India. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1924.
---. "What I Believe." Modern British Literature. Eds. John Hollander and Frank Kermode. New York: Oxford, 1973. 624.
Rutherford, Andrew. Introduction. Twentieth Century Interpretations of A Passage to India. Ed. Andrew Rutherford. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1970.
Scherer Herz, Judith. A Passage to India: Nation and Narration. New York: Twayne, 1993.
Both Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee were men of integrity, determination, passion and great skill. This is where their similarities end as Lee’s empowerment ideology differed from that of Grant’s aristocratic beliefs. Bruce Catton wrote about the two men in the essay, “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”. Catton, a Pulitzer Prize winning author and Civil War Historian, provides a brief character analysis of both men in this essay. The beliefs that Grant embraced as a frontiersman was more admirable than those aristocratic beliefs of Lee, and more men and women of today should understand and follow Grant’s principles.
The choices we make define the destiny of our lives. Since the beginning of time, man has always been an imperfect being full of flaws. Man is faced with different situations that can end up bringing disgrace to himself and his family if the situations are not well handled. In the texts Book II of the Aeneid by Virgil, Antigone by Sophocles, Oedipus the king by Sophocles, and Book XXII from the Iliad by Homer; Creon, the Trojan people, Hector, Achilles, and Oedipus embody what can lead to a man’s downfall through their own choices. Through these texts we are able to learn from the mistakes people made in the past and lead good moral lives. The texts illustrate how pride, lack of empathy, and ignorance lead to the destruction of man.
Damrosch, David, et al., ed. The Longman Anthology of British Literature: Vol. B. Compact ed. New York: Longman - Addison Wesley Longman, 2000. p. 2256
Stillinger, Jack, Deidre Lynch, Stephen Greenblatt, and M H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology of English Literature: Volume D. New York, N.Y: W.W. Norton & Co, 2006. Print.
Greenblatt, Stephen, and M. H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 9th ed. Vol. A. New York: W.W. Norton, 2012. Print
It could be said that Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee were men who embodied the meaning of being exact opposites of one another. In the first place, Lee was an aristocratic Virginian who held strong to the past while Grant was a hard working land man from out West. In contrast, Grant was the epitome of the new man coming around along with steel and machinery. Grant was brought up to work the land and to rely on nobody but himself. He was eager to leave the past behind and forge a new beginning for himself and his country. He saw his future as depending on how his nation was doing: if his nation prospered and grew, then his town, his livelihood also would prosper and grow. Conversely, Lee was more chivalric and old fashioned in his demeanor
James, Lawrence. Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. Print.
During the 1800s, the United States was changing, expanding, and experiencing many growing pains. In the periods before and directly after the Civil War, many people were influential and sculpted the path of the future. Ulysses S. Grant is significant to our nation’s history because he served in two wars, gave the Union its first major victory over the Confederates, and led the nation as president.
... 134). To Americans, India still continues to be an exotic land of fairytale. They also ask him questions on ‘recent rise of Hindu fundamentalism’ which Gogol, like any ordinary American kid, is oblivious to the current affairs of India. Another American lady Pamela comments that Gogol is lucky because he would not fall sick if he visits India like her friend had. Inspite of Gogol’s emphasis that his parents “devote the better part of suitcase to medicine . . .” Pamela cannot be convinced because to her Gogol’s identity is essentially to that of an Indian. It is apparent to a native American Gogol is a representative of India, a land of exotic culture, palaces, and simultaneously a land of diseases. In reality Gogol is like any other American kid of his generation but he cannot truly blend in their life as his first identity is ‘Indian’ and to that of an ‘outsider’.
When I first watched “An Unfinished Life”, I did not like it very much, but as I watched it several time in order to write my reflection paper, I resized it was great movie about forgiveness and family. I started to see the hidden means of the movie. I came to understand that some objects in the movie have significant meanings. However, when I read the novel, No One You Know, I thought the same way. Reading that novel taught me a new way to look at family, and relationships. Stories it selves are very different from each other but the lesson I learned from them were quite similar. As I was reading the book, during this term, I found no similarities between the movie and the novel, I never even thought of finding any similarities. However, when the opportunity arose to do this assignment, I started to think of a connection between my favorite movie and the book. I let myself go and wrote down everything that I thought was similar in the book and the novel. I was surprised to see how many similarities I came up with, in the theme of family and relationships. Therefore, I decided to compare the movie An Unfinished Life and the book, No One You Know that seemed quite different but shared some subtle themes and aspects with each other.
"The Lottery" utilizes an objective third-person perspective to create suspense and foreshadow the ending. It begins by introducing a village and its people on a "clear and sunny" morning, "with the fresh warmth of a full-summer day" (NA, 781), with people finishing their tasks in order to gather for an annual town lottery. The narrator describes the community in a manner similar to that of an observant visitor. When the children leave school for the summer, with the boys gathering stones and the girls talking aside them, the reader is comforted by the light-hearted atmosphere of the village. It seems like a normal, idyllic town with simple people that seem stereotypic of a small rural community, where the men are absorbed in talking about "planting and rain, tractors and taxes"(NA, 781) and the women gather to exchange "bits of gossip" (NA, 782). In the beginning, the reader discovers that as opposed to larger towns that also hold the lottery, this village could finish the event in late morning and "still be through in time to allow the villagers to get home for noon dinner" (NA, 781). Mr. Summer, who carries out the drawing and who is described as a "round-faced, jovial man" (NA, 782), adds to the sense of normality in the town and upcoming lottery.
2 Stein, Burton (2001), A History of India, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiv, 432,
REVISE THIS FIRST SENTENCE HERE!!!!!!!!****** In ancient greek culture, the idea of having gods determining the fate of the civilians was common. The actions taken by the citizens are purely based around fate, and in no way are related to doing things by choice. By knowing that the consequences of their actions are not controlled by themselves, the ancient greek citizens realize that they will not be the cause of their problems, as fate takes over and controls the results of their actions, which ultimately leading to their downfall. There are many sources for the downfall of the characters, however, fate is uncontrollable and takes over any situation and causes problems. try to rephrasing during editing because this is repetitive The one
The study of the adaptation process from novel to film in addition offers an insight into the nature of expression through words and through pictures, respectively.in what context do the seducing powers and the suggestiveness of the film unfolds? And when is one word capable of saying more than a thousand pictures? Another very good reason for novels-into-film studies is that such studies clearly stimulate the interest for literature, for reading and there are numerous examples of film adaptations causing a demand for the books they are based on. Frequently, old and little known novels experience a revival. Long forgotten novels have been reprinted, published in paper-back with pictures from the films on their covers and sold in newsstands along with magazines, papers and comic books. Even an author with a more limited accessibility, like Virginia Woolf, gained a considerably enlarged circle of readers after the adaptation of her own Mrs. Dalloway (1997) and of Michael Cunningham’s The Hours(2002).
Throughout the novel A Passage to India, by E.M. Forster, and Burmese Days, by George Orwell, the authors use race, culture, economics, and liberal humanism to discuss various colonial issues. These issues include controversies, power structures, injustices, and the idea of syncretism between the colonizers and the colonized. A Passage to India focuses largely on using culture and liberal humanism to explore issues of colonialism while Burmese Days mainly uses race and economics to explore these topics. While the novels use different methods of exploration, both novels very successfully take on the task of discussing the very colonial issues of controversies, power structures, injustices, and syncretism.