Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of modern architecture
Architectural history essay
History of modern architecture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of modern architecture
The deterioration of residential homes is common throughout the years due to wear and tear from everyday usage. The cost to prevent this deterioration is usually minimal and does not skyrocket into the hundreds of thousands of dollars for routine maintenance. In addition, the construction of residential homes has improved throughout the years; hence, not as many repairs are required over time. Engineers have developed better concepts of how homes will stand up against the elements and big box stores encourage the homeowners to repair and do their own maintenance on their standard house. However, there are residential homes that are nonconforming and their architectural designs are of those who have brought these homes into the forefront of Modern Architecture. One who is most noteworthy and is synonymous with residential homes is Frank Lloyd Wright. Known for his unique style of residential design, Frank Lloyd Wright was ahead of his time, however, the materials he used in these designs have proven to be unsustainable and cost hundreds of thousands, even millions, of dollars to homeowners for their preservation.
Born shortly after the end of the Civil War in 1867, Wright grew up mostly in Madison, WI. After college, he secured a position with the prestigious Chicago architectural firm Adler & Sullivan in 1887. A disagreement with Sullivan six years later, forced Wright to start his own firm. After he designed six other homes is when Wright started to come into his own permanent designs in architecture. He came to use repetitive design elements in his plans that included the open concept, fireplaces, glazed windows and doors and the use of organic materials that were incorporated into the homes. Some of these designs o...
... middle of paper ...
...maintain. Most were demolished decades ago. Those that remain require constant repair and are financially impossible for a single homeowner to maintain. Most of the homes remaining are designated historic sites or converted into some type of museum to pay for their upkeep. The cantilevers of Fallingwater require constant, expensive restoration to keep the entire house from falling into the river below it. Likewise, Hollyhock with its leaky roofs and crumbling stucco has cost the City of Los Angeles many extremely costly renovations. While both of these homes, along with most other Wright homes, are excellent examples of the Modern Architecture by which most houses are designed today, the millions of dollars that have been expended to maintain and preserve them makes these homes horribly unsustainable. It makes one wonder if the beauty is truly worth the price.
The design principles that Wright and Olmsted lived by helped to create a standard for following generations. Using Nature as an inspiration and a employing a consistent programmatic style have been characteristics that designers have picked up on from Wright, and plan to continue using. Juxtaposing nature and thick urban life, and finding innovative ways to mix the two, has become a signature characteristic that points to Olmsted. Both, Frank Lloyd Wright and Frederik Law Olmsted have had a heavy influence on designers today when it comes to including nature in design, but in very contrasting ways.
Gehry draws his inspiration from famous paintings such as the Madonna and Child which he qualifies as a “strategy for architecture” (Friedman M. , 2003, p. 42) and which he used as an inspiration for a project in Mexico . Through his interpretation of the paintings and artwork, Gehry looked for a new kind of architecture. His search for a new type of architecture culminated in 1978 with his own house in Santa Monica. What was once a traditional Californian house would be redesigned to become one of the most important and revolutionary designs of the 20th century, giving Gehry international prestige and fame. Frank Gehry’s “Own House” uses a mixture of corrugated metal, plywood, chain link and asphalt to construct a new envelope for an existing typical Californian house. This house has been inspired by Joseph Cornell, Ed Moses and Bob Rauschenberg. Gehry comments on his house by saying that there was something “magical” (Friedman M. , 2003, p. 54) about it. He admits having “followed the end of his [my] nose” (Friedman M. , 2003, p. 54) when it came to constructing the “new” house, which led Arthur Drexler, former Director...
Frank Lloyd Wright is arguably the most important and influential architects not just in America, but ever. This might be because he designed so many buildings, many of which are considered some of the most important American buildings. It also might be because when it came to architecture his ideas were very revolutionary. Frank Lloyd Wright was using what he called “Organic Architecture,” while everyone else was using Beaux-Arts architecture. Beaux-Arts architecture can be Classical, Gothic, Renaissance, Baroque, or Georgian styles. It uses ornamentation, detailed sculptures and carvings. There is often a marble staircase with elaborate banisters. Frank Lloyd Wright felt that the American society was afraid to live as itself. He thought they were just using everybody else’s culture, premade abroad. Wright believed that America should have their own style and art. Frank Lloyd Wright wanted to make a uniquely American architecture. Wright did create a new kind of architecture, Organic Architecture, the only problem was it had already been created. It had the same ideas ...
Usonian Utopian Houses was the invention by Frank Lloyd Wright, an American architect (1867-1959). Based around the principals of having a small and simple yet stylish house that was affordable and designed for the middle-class people of American. Wright also believed that Usonian houses were a type of architecture more than a style of house, he was quoted to have said, “Style is important, a style is not”. The last 20 years of Wright’s life was when he was focused of the designs of Usonian houses, starting with “Jacob’s House” (shown on photo on Left) located in Madison, Wisconsin in 1937. Less than 20 years later in the 1950’s Wright had designed a few hundred of the Usonian houses and had given them the nickname “Usonian Automatics”.
He’s the American architect who influenced architecture around the globe. He’s the individual who influenced the mindset of others. In addition, he was a writer and an educator that lectured the younger generations. The name of this man should have already crossed your mind. He is Frank Lloyd Wright, one of the best American architects. Wright was born on June 8, 1867, in Richland Center, Wisconsin. Even though he had many hardships in his life and struggled, he always had a goal. He once said, “…having a good start, not only do I fully intend to be the greatest architect who has yet lived, but fully intend to be the greatest architect who will ever live. Yes, I intend to be the greatest architect of all time.” Today, Wright is known around the world, especially from his masterpiece, Fallingwater. Fallingwater was designed by Wright in 1935. The engineers started building in 1936, and it was completed in 1939. The house was for built for Edgar J. Kaufmann Sr., a successful businessman. The building was located in Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Additionally, the building was named “best all-time work of American architecture” by the members of the American institute of Architects in 1991. Wright believed in designing architecture that was in accordance with humanity and its environment. He called this philosophy, organic architecture. Fallingwater was designed according to the organic architecture.
Frank Lloyd Wright is acclaimed as the 20th century 's greatest architect. He was a genius architect wielding a T-square and a master builder who embraced nature. Wright was born in Frank Lloyd Wright was born on June 8, 1867, in Richland Center, Wisconsin, some 20 miles west of Spring Green where he eventually built his beloved home...all 37,000 square feet of it...Taliesin (Tally-ESS-in).
...As a result I can conclude that these houses are similar in terms of their main purpose of being eco-friendly and all use different ways of doing so for example solar energy and conserving heat loss through different methods. The House at Regensburg and The Hockerton Housing Project both use these energy saving techniques for form and function for example wood and glass is used for aesthetics and a natural atmosphere while acting as insulation. Also these houses can arguably be vernacular it terms of style, materials used and technique, but maybe to a stretched view of being vernacular. Therefore these ideals also follow Frank Lloyd Wright’s ideals of ‘form and function are one’ (Jackie Craven, page 1 2009). All the houses also have similar layouts in terms of zoning and how each part of the building is used aiding the user even though they were built decades apart.
When Charles Greene married, he took a four month honeymoon to Europe where he traveled through England and Scotland, his inspiration for the English Arts and Crafts movement was ignited. In 1903, Greene and Greene began developing ways to offer integrated design services for their clients, which would mean they would have a more hands on approach in overseeing the design and construction of the furniture and various interior design appointments. They managed to accomplish 150 projects during their peak years. Although they proved to be a hot commodity in the architectural world, Greene and Greene experienced a period of...
Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier are two very prominent names in the field of architecture. Both architects had different ideas concerning the relationship between humans and the environment. Their architectural styles were a reflection of how each could facilitate the person and the physical environment. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House, is considered one of the most important buildings in the history of American architecture and Le Corbusier s Villa Savoye helped define the progression that modern architecture was to take in the 20th Century. Both men are very fascinating and have strongly influenced my personal taste for modern architecture. Although Wright and Corbusier each had different views on how to design a house, they also had similar beliefs. This paper is a comparison of Frank Lloyd Wright‘s and Le Corbusier ‘s viewpoints exhibited through their two prominent houses, Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House and Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye.
Frank Lloyd Wright, born Frank Lincoln Wright on June 8th, 1867 in Richland Center, Wisconsin and passed away April 9th, 1959 in Phoenix, Arizona at the age of 91, helped build the United States' Architectural profoundness to the point it is at today. His awards include; the Royal Gold Medal for Architecture, the Sir George Watson Chair by the Royal Institute of British Architects, the Gold Medal of the American Institute of Architects, the Centennial Award from Popular Mechanics magazine and many others including honorary degrees from eight different institutions. On display for public viewing are over fifty of Frank Lloyd Wright’s amazing and influential architectural pieces, with hundreds of others around the
Mr. Wright was an amazing architect in not just his generation, but in the generations that followed. He created some of Americas most iconic and extravagant buildings that many people often wondered how he came up with the ideas. I struggle with this same problem also.
Frank Lloyd Wright has been called “one of the greatest American architect as well as an Art dealer that produced a numerous buildings, including houses, resorts, gardens, office buildings, churches, banks and museums. Wright was the first architect that pursues a philosophy of truly organic architecture that responds to the symphonies and harmonies in human habitats to their natural world. He was the apprentice of “father of Modernism” Louis Sullivan, and he was also one of the most influential architects on 20th century in America, Wright is idealist with the use of elemental theme and nature materials (stone, wood, and water), the use of sky and prairie, as well as the use of geometrical lines in his buildings planning. He also defined a building as ‘being appropriate to place’ if it is in harmony with its natural environment, with the landscape (Larkin and Brooks, 1993).
Humans originally created simple shelters for safety and warmth, but as humanity grew intellectually, socially, and industrially the idea of the house changed to also mean an extension of the family. What someone does or does not do with a house’s interior, exterior, and landscape could be a subtle or blunt statement about the family that resides there. As humanities need to express themselves through their homes grew more sophisticated, several careers developed to meet that demand. Architecture was one of those new careers and Frank Lloyd Wright was one of the leading architects during the twentieth century. Wright designed and supervised the construction of Fallingwater for the Kaufmann family and this family home soon became known as one
Norman Foster is a British architect who was born in Manchester in 1935. He graduated from University School of Architecture (Manchester) in 1961 and won a scholarship to study Master’s Degree in Architecture at Yale University. Later in 1967 he teamed up with 4 other peers and established a practice called Foster + Partners which was founded in London and is now one of the most well-known international design practices.
Heritage buildings as described by Feilden (2000) are “buildings that give us a sense of wonder and make us want to know more about people and culture that produce it”. A more elaborate definition was made by Kamal and Harun (2002) where they defined them as buildings built in the past which have high historical and architectural values and require continuous care and protection to preserve their historical, architectural, aesthetic, archaeological, spiritual, social, political and economic values. In other words, heritage buildings are expected to have an indefinite life span, signifying that they should be preserved for as long as possible. This was also pointed out by Feilden (1982) where stated that heritage buildings differ from modern buildings because they are anticipated to last forever. He also described heritage buildings as “buildings that for various reasons society has decided shall be preserved for as long as possible”.