Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of research
Importance of research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of research
What is one thing in a kitchen that most people use everyday? MIcrowaves. If it weren’t for a mistake then people would not have them. Many discoveries and ideas were made because of mistakes, or accidents. If everything happens the way that someone wants it, then you won't learn something or get something out of it. Also, if something goes wrong, or a mistake happens you will know what not to do next time. But on the other hand, many discoveries are made purely by hard work and research, not just mistakes. Mistakes help people learn, and make new discoveries. To begin with, if everything happens the way that you want it, then you will not learn anything, or get something out of your experiences. For example, if someone was trying to fix their car, and came across a box that can hold spare keys , then they benefited their life because of an accident. To add on, if someone was doing an experiment, and they already knew the result, and exactly what to do, then they wouldn’t have learned anything . If something different happens then they learned something, and benefited. In source 2, paragraph 16, it states, ‘Standing near the magnetron one day, he noticed it was on, Spencer noticed that the bar of chocolate in his pocket has melted…Minutes later the man who you can thank for popcorn had a discovery in his hands. A man was doing an experiment and …show more content…
For example, if someone was cooking and used two cups rather than three, it might turn out tasting bad, but now that person knows what not to do next time. Thing is, with mistakes people never lose. If something goes wrong, then they will always learn how, and how not to do things. In source 4, it is stated,”We often discover what will do, by finding out what will not do.” If you want to learn something new then the first step is always to learn what not to do. All the time, people learn from their
Many great scientists have found lost cities and great treasures, how? By making mistakes. Mistakes have led to great discoveries and rich people. Many errors lead to lost treasure, making new things, and you can learn from them; so you do not make the same mistake again. Therefore, mistakes are crucial part of a discovery.
Firstly,mistakes can be bad but they can also be good and lead to major discoveries. For example,in the first story,Heinrich Schliemann thought he knew exactly where the ancient city of Troy was so he started digging up trenches of dirt. He did make a mistake and dug too close and although artifacts were broken,he and Frank Calvert still found many unbroken artifacts and discovered where Troy had been. In conclusion,mistakes can do bad things but people can get some good things out of it,like big discoveries.
A great example is how some dogs learn how to open a gate. They do not go through an extensive thought process to figure out how to open the gate. All the dog does is make multiple attempts at opening it until it succeeds. In Hare’s research, he mentions that the dog does not know about the connectivity between the gate and the fence and therefore he does not understand that he has “to break the connection” by moving the latch (168). However, there are different ways in which the dog could have found out how to open the gate, and that is if he had seen someone else open it before he attempted to do
...at area was taken over with little firepower from few men, but 1 bullet is as good as a thousand arrows if it’s aimed right. The invention of this thing people usually say is bad, guns kill people, and bombs are for nothing but death, even fireworks are too dangerous. They cannot see that it has made their life, it helped us become more modern through our aspirations to make a better powder we discovered so much more about the universe and ourselves chemically. How without these necessary “evils” could we be where we are today, we couldn’t. Thanks to over a thousand years of experimentation and refining of gunpowder, we understand things better in all types of ways, especially chemically and physically, and troves of knowledge gained on how to gain scientific knowledge from only observation, we can’t have chemistry or our history without pyrotechnics and explosives.
I agree with Emerson's statement because if you already master something that your good at and don't try new things then you can never learn. For example if I'm really good at football and I want to play basketball I can't just start on a team with knowing any of the rule. Another example would be applying for a job or trying to ride a motorcycle. Lets say I wanted to ride a motorcycle but I only knew how to drive a car. I can't just hop on a motorcycle and be able to ride it I have to learn how to ride one. I also have to take a test showing I know how to ride a motorcycle. If I only know how to drive a car and I don't want to learn how to ride a motorcycle but I want ride one I can't because I have no experience riding one.
One of the many brilliant things Ben Franklin once said was, “Well done is better than well said.” Being a pioneer of electricity, the inventor of bifocals, and one of the founding fathers of the United State’s constitution, Franklin knew more than a little about changing society and history for the better. The ideals of this successful man are parallel to the ideas of John Ruskin, who describes that as a society, “What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is what we do.” This is outlook is accurate because, quite simply, there is a higher impact when something is done compared to when something is simply just thought.
Everyone makes mistakes, yet even the smallest of mistakes can change the entire course of history given a time machine and a Tyrannosaurus Rex. Learn to cherish the life on this Earth, and don’t let poor choices dictate the future ahead. Making the right decision is key to success, and only we can choose what successes we want to
Quoting David Wallace, he says “..being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience.” (Wallace, pg 3). To be able to do what David Wallace is talking about, a person has to learn from their failures in the way they think. For example, if a person has a bad experience eating seafood such as salmon, they learn from that failure, and probably will not eat salmon for a long period of time. Learning how to think about your failures is one of the main objectives in order to learn from those mistakes.
This paper will discuss several different aspects of using evidence research. It will compare and contrast validity vs. reliability and address wither it is possible to have an instrument that is valid and not reliable. It will also examine type I and type II errors as well as examine the differences between parametric and non-parametric. Lastly, this paper will look probability and what the minimum level of significance is for a research paper.
Knowledge is the key to success; however in the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley is used to caution people that knowledge is not always the answer for good or evil purposes. When someone uses their knowledge in a wrong way, they tend to use it wrong. Knowledge is somehow being an invasion of how technology and
learning takes place or the mood we were in may act as a cue later.
Connectionism which states that behavioral responses to specific stimuli are established through a process of trial and error that affects neural connections between the stimuli and the most satisfying responses. Thorndike postulated that the most fundamental type of learning involves the forming of associations (connections) between sensory experiences (perceptions of stimuli or events) and neural impulses (responses) that manifest themselves behaviorally. He believed that learning often occurs by trial and error (selecting and connecting). (Schunk, 2016) Human learning can be very complex because people in this world like to learn when they connect ideas, analyze things and reason certain things. I would also agree that in order for someone to learn something there has to be an opportunity to try something and eventually errors will come up. A mistake is something that will keep us learning new things. For some people connectionism is not effective because they are afraid from failure. With errors occurring, connectionism can be damaging.
Merriam-Webster defines learning as a lifelong process of transforming information and experience into knowledge, skills, behaviors, and attitudes. In other words, what we learn throughout our lifetime helps shape us as individuals. Although as humans we are capable of making mistakes, it is these mistakes that usually teach us the most about ourselves and often become valuable life lessons. Not so long ago, I learned one of these valuable life lessons in the most unexpected way. What lesson did I learn, you may ask. I learned that sometimes the only way to fully understand what someone is trying to teach you is to experience it for yourself and find out the hard way.
Research philosophy, refers to the development of knowledge adopted by the researchers in their research (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). In other words, it is the theory that used to direct the researcher for conducting the procedure of research design, research strategy, questionnaire design and sampling (Malhotra, 2009). It is very important to have a clear understanding of the research philosophy so that we could examine the assumptions about the way we view the world, which are contained in the research philosophy we choose, knowing that whether they are appropriate or not (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), three major ways of thinking about research philosophy are examined: ontology, epistemology and axiology. Each of them carries significant differences which will have an impact on the way we consider the research procedures. Ontology, “is concerned with nature of reality”, while epistemology “concerns what constitutes acceptable knowledge in a field of study and axiology “studies judgements about value” (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009, p110, p112, p116). This study is intent on creating some “facts” from objective evaluations which are made by the subjects. Therefore, epistemology will be chosen for this study as the way of thinking about the research philosophy.
He further explained that the common factor between learning and forgetting is that they both represent a “change in the availability or future reproducibility of the learning material,” with learning representing an “increment in availability” and forgetting representing a “decrement in availability” (Weibell, 2011).