Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To kill a mockingbird american classic
To kill mockingbird news story project
Eyewitness Identification and Testimony
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: To kill a mockingbird american classic
A Critical Analysis of Miracle in Cell No. 7 Miracle in Cell No. 7, directed by Lee Hwan-kyung is a Korean film about a mentally handicapped father Yong-Goo who is wrongfully imprisoned, identifying a dreadful separation from his young daughter Ye-seung. Their relationship is the deepest part behind the film and shows the sad realities of how people with authorities abuse the power given to them. This film truly touched my heart and Hwan-kyung briefly shows how much love a daughter has for her father. However, the film shows confusing flashbacks, lack of details and the wrongful accusations of a mentally handicapped man. The film begins with a grown up Ye-seung who is given a pile of case files by a police officer who she later calls “Dad”. …show more content…
While the Chief Warden and Yong-Goo’s cellmates trained him prior to his final hearing, Yong-Goo did not deliver the speech which would have cleared his name. Since he was threatened by the victim's father, Yong-Goo chose to accept the death sentence in order to protect Ye-seung. It doesn’t matter whether he did or didn’t murder the girl, only that Yong-Goo’s fragile mind was malleable enough to pressure him into agreeing to the rules and expectations of the legal process. This relates to the book ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ by Harper Lee, there was not even proof that Tom raped Mayella and still he was accused when he was actually innocent. This is because most wrongful convictions are mainly caused by eyewitness misidentification, Instead, witness memory must be looked carefully and come back perfectly, or erased. But because Yong-Goo is mentally handicapped and ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ Tom who is black, they don’t use the evidence and take advantage of who they are instead. But the scene that frustrated me the most was when Yong-Goo is re-enacting the so-called 'Crime Scene' of his (which is not). And when he was doing CPR on the mannequin, the police pulled it by saying "You Strangled her" "You Kissed Her" just because the daughter of the higher police officer died. Most police officers should already know that it is CPR, but of course they don’t know justice and
In To Kill a Mockingbird, a conflict that connects to the theme innocence should be protected is the death of Tom Robinson. Once found guilty, Tom Robinson was placed in prison. Because of his race, Robinson knew he would be sentenced the death penalty. Soon after being convicted, Robinson tried to escape. He knew that he didn’t deserve to be punished. While trying to escape, he was shot 17 times by p...
One can almost feel the searing penetration of Lewis Thomas’ analytical eye as it descends the narrow barrel of the microscope and explodes onto a scene of vigorous, animated, interactive little cells—cells inescapably engrossed in relaying messages to one another with every bump and bounce; with every brush of the elbow, lick of the stamp, and click of the mouse…
The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher by Lewis Thomas consists of short, insightful essays that offer the reader a different perspective on the world and on ourselves.
Sympathy is unfair. An alarmingly large number of people are treated apathetically when they make certain decisions, such as those made by Mayella Ewell in Harper Lee To Kill a Mockingbird. A common trend in society is to pass judgement on others without giving heed to the situationality of circumstances. When looking at whether or not people deserve sympathy, the specifics of a situation have to be considered. Thus, one must do the same when deciding if Mayella Ewell is deserving of sympathy. The actions she took — specifically, framing a negro man named Tom Robinson for rape — are met with intense scrutiny and criticism. This is, of course, done without considering the rationale of her thought process. On one hand, Mayella can tell the truth
The brothel boy is the main suspect when a local 12 year old girl is raped. The victim is found naked with a head wound being held by the brothel boy after a group of farmers hear a scream coming from the river. Since he was the only one there the villagers assumed he was the perpetrator. So they formed a mob and tried to get people’s justice by almost beating him to death. This small village is located in Burma before modern times. Many believe that the brothel boy committed this assault because he has worked in the brothel all his life, seeing the acts, and is very undereducated. The villagers are calling that the brothel boy be hanged for his crime because they fear he could do it again if he gets out. The brothel boy’s punishment all comes
One of the major events in Harper Lee’s award-winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird is Tom Robinson’s trial. It is based on the Scottsboro Case that took place in 1931 in Alabama, in which several black men were accused of raping two white women. Both the Scottsboro Boys and Tom Robinson are unfairly judged, however, because of prejudice against colored people. The racial discrimination makes whites’ testimony more believable even when it contradicts itself. The same happens in To Kill a Mockingbird. As we delve deeper into the case and get increasingly closer to the truth, it is quite suprising to see that Mayella Ewell is the true villain rather than a victim. She shall and must bear full responsibility for her actions because she makes the decision to tempt Tom Robinson, gives false testimony in court that directly leads to Tom’s death, and has been well aware of the consequences of her behaviors.
Atticus had enough evidence to prove to the Jury that Tom’s right arm did not work and that would mean that Tom could not have pulled Mayella to the ground and bruised her as the policeman described. The crowd was surprised but the Jury and the Judge did not believe Atticus’s evidence. They were prejudiced and if Atticus came up with the best possible explanation the Judge still believed the Ewell family and they did not come up with a reasonable explanation about Tom. “As you grow older, you’ll see white men cheat black men every day of your life, but let me tell you something and don’t you forget it whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that white man is trash” (Atticus) chapter 23. Prejudice hurts people who are black and people who were different and young
Tom Robinson had been accused of raping Mayella Ewell, the eldest child of the worst white trash family in Maycomb. In all actuality, Mayella had flirted with Tom and got caught by her father. Her father, Bob Ewell, had beat Mayella with his left hand, which proved Tom not guilty since he could not move his left arm. Atticus explains the motives in his final speech of the trial. “‘I say guilt, gentlemen, because it was guilt that motivated her. She committed no crime, she has merely broken a rigid and time-honored code of our society, a code so severe that whoever breaks it is hounded from our midst as unfit to live with. She is a victim of cruel poverty and ignorance, but I cannot pity her: she is white… She was white and tempted a negro. She did something that in our society is unthinkable: she kissed a black man… There is circumstantial evidence that to indicate that Mayella Ewell was beaten savagely by someone who led almost exclusively with his left… Tom Robinson now sits before you… with the only good hand he possesses- his right hand.’” (272) Most people in this day and age would be easily swayed into Tom’s defense with the evidence provided by Atticus, but this is the 1930’s in the deep south of the United States, and a black man could never be innocent in a case as such. “Judge Taylor was polling the jury: ‘Guilty… guilty… guilty… guilty...’” (282)
Guilty! Despite all evidence Atticus shows in court to prove that Tom Robinson, a black man accused of raping a 19 year-old girl is innocent in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, the jury has found Tom responsible for committing this act against Robert Ewell’s daughter, Mayella Ewell. However, it is never said why they thought Tom was guilty, and how their bias influenced their judgement. In addition, both Tom’s mistake while being cross-examined and Mayella’s emotional reaction further convinced the jury of Tom’s guilt ignoring the overwhelming proof of innocence presented by Atticus.
One that is entering the counseling field will see this movie from a different perspective. It gives examples of what a counselor should and should not do. In the future, one may encounter a client like Antwone and must be prepared to help the client. The client should feel comfortable with the counselor. Positive results should come out of the counseling sessions.
I would never wish to put that girl in harm’s way, or anybody at all, for that matter. If getting yelled at by Mr. Ewell would save Mayella from getting beat, I would be willing to do it anyday. By law a jury is supposed to be unbiased towards one group of people, but poor Tom had an all-white jury that most likely didn’t pay attention to any of the evidence. Even before any evidence was presented at all, the tried to lynch Tom for no reason other than he was a negro. I can remember the other day when a scout asked me “You aren’t really a nigger-lover, are you?”
As the trial began, Jem and Scout wanted to sneak their way into the courtroom to see and hear the trial. The first person they examined was Mr. Heck Tate, he was the first one at the scene and he said when he got there he found Mayella bruised and beaten. When he asked her who had done this to her she claimed that Tom Robinson had raped her. Atticus then cross-examined the witness who admitted that no doctor was summoned, and told him that Mayella’s bruises were on the rig...
This man is unfortunately victimized since his society does not believe he is innocent due to the color of his skin. Being the black man that Tom is, it is clear that “Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella opened her mouth and screamed” (241). There is no way that a black man’s words would override the voice of a white person. No testimony, evidence or speech can help Tom prove he is not guilty. Atticus understands that Tom is victimized by racism, so he explains: “When it’s a white man’s word against a black man’s, the white man always wins” (220).
These injustices have begun long before Tom’s trial, but it is his trial which epitomizes the problems with our society. The first witness was simply just a misguided fellow named Heck Tate who it seems didn’t have much to offer to the case. Next, Atticus Finch called Bob Ewell to the stand. When I saw Ewell take the stand such a fierce hatred rose within me that I began to shake and tremble. Ewell wrongfully accused Tom of raping his daughter Mayella, however, with the grace of God, Atticus Finch had shown that it was very possible that it was Bob Ewell who because he was a lefty could have beat Mayella. If it were not for great men like Atticus Finch I would have lost all hope for this world. As I watched Mayella take the stand I wondered how such a kind looking person could be someone of such poor character. Her words seemed to paint a picture of a sad life; one where a father neglects her and she has fallen under hard times. Atticus, after pointing out it was probably Bob who beat her, asked Mayella who it really was that beat her. Mayella made it clear it was Tom Robinson, upon which Atticus asked Tom to stand. To the astonishment of the court Tom was handicapped! Tom was then called to the stand where he laid open for all to see the truth, explaining that it was Mayella who came on to him (that treacherous woman!). Soon enough the trial ended and every one awaited the verdict of the jury. The next few hours were the most nerve wracking of my life.
This film really focuses on the characters. Their thoughts, anger, distress, and mistakes become part of your mistakes. This deals with a father’s s priority and how he will achieve that priority by using unethical ways like torturing an innocent man. Bringing up child abduction and torture are