Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to become a good college student essay
Challenges in college essay
Challenges in college essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to become a good college student essay
In Milo B. Beckman’s article “Why I Write Bad” he talks about how college students are not taking their college writing serious enough. They are merely going through the motions of writing out a “formula” of what they think the professor wants to read and then adding that extra fluff to make it look pretty on the outside but not have a lot of substance on the inside when you actually go into it and analysis what the essay is really saying. For Beckman to get his main message across to his readers he uses his experience as a student and his vast knowledge of his audience to convey to them of the importance of actual good writing through his diction and appealing to their need for success. Milo B. Beckman had clearly written the article for mainly college students to read. The fact that he is a college student himself, the article is published in The Harvard Crimson, and the language that he uses makes it very obvious …show more content…
With him establishing himself as a trustworthy person the reader doesn’t really ask themselves that many questions when they are reading the statements that he is writing. He also mentions another author named Steven Pinker, who wrote an article in The Chronicle call “Why Academics Stink at Writing”. Beckman uses this source from a more well-known writer, that has also written an article that has a similar topic to the one that he wrote, because it strengthens the argument that he is presenting in the article. The students will realize that this is not just a problem that they have at Harvard but a problem that they have at campuses all over the nation. Most students want to strive for success and when they hear that college students all over the United States are making the same writing mistakes over and over they will want to make a change to that. Beckman was able to do this because of how well he knows his
“Tom Hanks: I Owe It All to Community College” does not fit into the category of academic writing. The article by Tom Hanks uses informal writing to convey his ideas, fails to document sources using a specific citation style, and does not present his ideas as a response to others. In contrast to Hanks’ article, academic writing is described as “standard edited English, using clear and recognizable patterns of organization, marking logical relationships between ideas, presenting ideas to others, and using appropriate citation styles” (Lunsford et al. 45).
In the 2013 NBC news article, “Johnny Can’t Write, and Why Employers Are Mad”, written by CNBC’s Kelley Holland, she introduces the substandard state of lack of responsibility taken for writing and communication problems in schools of all grade levels. Holland explains according to the “Association of American Colleges and Universities conducted by Hart Research Associates 80 percent said colleges should focus more on written and oral communications”. Holland points out that “Nobody takes responsibility for writing instruction”. Holland implies that this problem affects not only job seekers and college students, but school districts also. Holland notes that this problem starts early on she reports according to William Elliot “an adjunct professor
Benton uses the article to persuade educators and professors not to give up on the students and to try to protect those students that do want to learn: “I have become convinced that professors -- particularly the ones with tenure -- need to find ways to give remedial attention to student behavior, just as they have long done for students who cannot read or write well enough to succeed at college.” Furthermore, the article evaluates the problems and gets to the real cause of the lack of care and
Professor Ken Macrorie is frustrated, and through his article “The Poison Fish” is willing to help college students become good writers instead of using phony and pretentious language to impress their teachers. He names this language, Engfish through his frustration of the use of the phony language he explains why it is bad, and then with an optimistic tone gives hsi college students a way to become great writers .
The question that Dale leaves the question to the readers is “What happens to the kids that complete college?” An alternative route that Dale Stephen should have taken was to explain the other side about how some students have been successful when they complete college and get a degree and a good job that pays well. If Dale didn’t just use his own evidence and his own opinions then people would most likely believe his point more and look into it. The fact that the article was allowed to be published was shocking because he just complains that college is not going to do anyone any good
Then, for the bulk of the passage, Fridman offers various examples of nerds being looked down upon to convey the issue’s pervasiveness. This is seen when Fridman refers to Harvard when he describes “anti-intellectualism is rampant”(paragraph 3). By citing an esteemed school that prides itself on academic achievement and rigor, Fridman shows how far reaching intellectual devaluation is. In other words, even places that claim to have academically driven
Initially, in paragraphs 1-3, the author illustrates the story and death of Mr. K, a former teacher of the author who was extremely strict. By providing this story, the author expresses a personal connection to traditional teaching, attributing their own success to these methods. In addition to the aforementioned personal connection, the author later expresses in paragraph 4 that both the author and the educators of America need to help “our students”. By using the term “our students”, the author conveys a personal connection to the current students’ performance. Later, in paragraph 8, the author displays strong conviction when referring to the points made in the argument as “a battle cry inspired by my old teacher and buttressed by new research.” Moreover, the author expresses more confidence in Mr. K’s teachings, stating in the last paragraph that Mr. K’s results are a “lesson we can all learn from,” In addition to an apparent personal link to the content of the article, the author also utilizes their academic background, having attended Yale and worked for popular news outlets, to conduct research to properly support the arguments with factual evidence. Throughout the article, Lipman repeatedly cites research from respected sources such as psychologists, the U.S. Department of Education, and colleges to directly reinforce the idea of the
If the article was written to people who had already completed college and were well into their careers, it would be a pointless essay. Same goes for if the essay was written for people who had no plans on ever attending college. This essay was specifically written for those who are either about to enter college or have opportunities to transfer still. The author wants the audience to make the best decisions on what kind of institution is best for receiving and retaining knowledge. He also wants future prospects to see that so much more happens in college than just learning and the overall experience as a whole is what shapes one into an intellectual person. This is seen through his comment when he communicates that while some “working adults pursuing clearly defined vocational programs” (Neem 93) may learn wonderfully in an online environment, overall “we must deepen our commitment to those institutions that cultivate a love for learning in their students” (Neem 94). He wants an audience that sees the importance of furthering their education in the right environment like he does. This audience along with an intellectual appeal complement each other well in this argument and lead to an overall good
Knoblauch. I do not agree with this essay due to the fact that no matter which school you attend there will always be different types of students there with different types of literacy because we are not all the same. I feel he did not have extensive enough research on this for me to be sold on the topic.
Many times, high school students are assigned to write essays based on inspirational figures or literature read in class, often requiring the same rhetoric following fastidious rules of English and sprinkling decorative wording across pages. Obeying the formats demanded by teachers is easy enough, but it is not creatively challenging. Author of "What Should Colleges Teach?", Stanley Fish, claims it is to learn the proper ways of composition alone that allows students to flourish; however, I question if it is possible to follow these principles too closely. Can it be so that the curriculum being taught in high schools fail to allow students to realize the potential creativity that can be involved when writing? Instead students are possibly turned
Graff, G., Birkenstein, C., & Durst, R. K. (2009). The Growing College Gap. "They say/I say": the moves that matter in academic writing : with readings (p. 379). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel K. Durst. "They Say/I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing: With Readings. Vol. 2e. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2012. Print.
As writers, many students write to the expectations of their professors and not to their fullest potential. Throughout English 101 I had been writing only to please my professor or to fill the basic requirement to pass English. I always felt that my writing ability was never enough for my professors throughout the previous years. They always wanted clear and concise essays, which for some reason was unreachable by me. However, starting college and taking English 101 helped me with my weaknesses and changed my technique of writing essays. My experience in English 101 taught me to write to my fullest potential and to write what I felt; rather then writing what was required.
He shows his argument when he uses Harvard university a very well known academic institute that can be recognized by most people as one of the most prestigious university in the United States. He uses Harvard as an example because it is one of the most reputable universities in the U.S how even people at Harvard who are known for their academic greatness fear to be labeled as a “geek”. In the end these Harvard student lie about how much they study instead of embraces how hard they study instead of pretend that they do not really try. Fridman uses Harvard to show how severe anti-intellectualism is in such a school which makes people think if it students at Harvard behave in that manner at such a prestigious place how are the conditions of anti-intellectualism in normal schools at younger grades and how it influences other that are more likely to fall into the pressure of the social standards of our
Writing is an important part of everyone’s life, whether we use it in school, in the workplace, as a hobby or in personal communication. It is important to have this skill because it helps us as writers to express feelings and thoughts to other people in a reasonably permanent form. Formal writing forms like essays, research papers, and articles stimulates critically thinking. This helps the writer to learn how to interpret the world around him/her in a meaningful way. In college, professors motivate students to write in a formal, coherent manner, without losing their own voice in the process. Improving your writing skills is important, in every English class that’s the main teaching point; to help students improve their writing skills. Throughout my college experience I have acknowledge that