Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Defense spending pros and cons
US military spending essay
US military spending essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Defense spending pros and cons
In our country today our citizens go through the day like everything is perfectly fine when they never really notice or care to think of the problems this country of ours is facing everyday unless it is effecting them directly. Many people don’t notice our constant struggle over in other countries especially in the Middle East regarding our military and allies, or how each day our country goes deeper in debt, or even the fact that our government has trouble getting things done and passed due to the disagreements between our two political parties. I believe that until these problems are solved like slowly pulling troops out our current engagements and just supporting our allies, or a major one is cutting back on certain programs and funding …show more content…
That number increases each and every day due to our careless spending. If we don’t act now our future generations will have to pay drastically for what is happening, and if we don’t start soon we may never be able to recover. One suggestion I said earlier was to cut back on some areas of military spending which right now we spend around 718 Billion dollars a year. I do agree that our safety should be the utmost importance but I don’t think we need to be spending money on mass numbers of troops overseas, who are involved in wars and conflicts that we don’t need to be in. Another idea that may help cut spending would to be stricter on who can collect unemployment and who shouldn’t. Unemployment is costing us around 250 Billion a year out of our budget and I believe that could be decreased if people on unemployment were required to take random drug tests and show proof that they are looking for a job and trying to find work. Some people on unemployment live off the government and spend most their money on illegal substances. I think that if a person should fail a random drug test will collecting the benefit they should be removed and prevented from receiving for a set amount of time. Also to keep people from relying on the money they should show proof that they are trying and searching for a job. That proof could be the signature or stamp from an interviewer or a copy of an application submitted and approved. That would keep the abusing of the benefits limited and help us save money that can go towards helping reduce the
In the simulation today, we passed Bill 114 in the House. This bill, also known as the High Speed Rail Travel Bill, calls for the United States government to provide direct assistance to private railroad corporations to construct and maintain a high-speed rail system. Private railroad corporations and the Republicans in the House gained as a result of the passing of this policy in the House, since the federal government will provide the initial funds to private corporations to build the infrastructure that is needed to link major cities all across the United States, in the case of interstate highways and airports. The passing of this bill, although it supports big business and private corporations, could also be considered a gain for the Democratic
Some people feel that the majority of individuals receiving welfare benefits are simply lazy and do not intend to work to earn money for themselves and their families. While it is true that there are deceptive people amongst us within our society, it would be unfair to punish the honest along with them by enforcing a work requirement. Although it...
Drug testing the people on welfare is beneficial because those who are on drugs would no longer receive welfare allowing the system to save money. (Carpenter 1) With more than billions of dollars of government funds possibly ending up in the wrong places or spent treating drug habits, the least that can be done is to make sure money is being put in the right hands. “Every dollar that is fed to a welfare recipient’s drug habit is a dollar lost to a family that would have spent it on needed items.” (Vitter 2) Taxpayers money should not be spent to treat drug habits. (1) Some states are having to tighten welfare eligibility to deal with limited state budgets. drug testing would better yet inform the government who is abusing the system. Drug testing can use up to hundreds or possibly thousands a month wasted on drugs, not only is it dangerous for their well being, but it does harm to the economy as we build up further and further into debt. Once one state passes a law to drug test it sends a message to other states and makes sense for other states to pass the same law. this...
If only 3% is committing fraud, than 97% of families receiving benefits really need it. Is it humane to not aid the 97% that really need help? Once again there are solutions to decreasing the small amount of fraud being committed instead of slashing the program all together. There are already programs in place, such as GAIN or Grow, to help beneficiaries get help with resumes, get job training, go to school, and help the beneficiaries place themselves in a position for the long-term. Another solution would be to add more programs or ensure the programs already in place is
Our country is the country of, for, and by the people, and yet we aren't doing enough to help ourselves. More and more people are moving out of their houses and into the streets every day; people are getting addicted to drugs; men, women, and children are dying from violence. Yet we still insist on helping others. Obviously there are enough problems here for the government to worry about, and we are need focus on these problems which need to be solved.
"The soldier is the Army. No army is better than its soldiers. The Soldier is also a citizen. In fact, the highest obligation and privilege of citizenship is that of bearing arms for one’s country” (-General George S. Patton Jr). Here within our borders we are the lucky ones, we have been blessed with the pleasure of so many brave men and women; to volunteer in the world's greatest military; and put their lives on the line for something that they believe is a moral obligation. But, think of some other countries, that have conscription (the practice of ordering people by law to serve in the armed forces) laws. We as a nation have some laws on conscription, and if you are male and above the age of 18 you have already signed the slip of paper stating that in the time of war; if our great nation re-instated the draft then there is a great chance you will be serving on the frontline of the next Great War. This brings me to my first topic of this page, is it ethical to have a draft? My second topic that I will discuss will be on if it is morally acceptable to "draft dodge". What I mean on the second topic is if you have a right; that morally allows you to not go fight in the war.
The U.S. military is a strong force and body that protects and serves the American people. Many people support the military and some even disagree with it. What people forget is that without a military the U.S. would be totally over run by foreign countries claiming ground. The military also helps with the nation’s economy boosting the balance of money in the works. Families have trouble with members who serve since there is always chance that they never return but it is because of their service that we are still a free country. Even though the military causes pain to families when a loved one is lost, the U.S. needs a military because with a military the economy increases and that without a military we would be invaded by a dictator or foreign
In the United States, roughly 30,000,000 people are on some form of welfare. That is 8% of the United States population! Should there be more restrictions to welfare? Some people believe that welfare should have restrictions, while others believe it should not have restrictions. What somewhat drives this controversy is whether welfare is effective, considering it is prone to be exploited.
Should the government decrease military spending or should it increase military spending? This is a question that many Americans wrestle with, and politically speaking, is a point of great contention since to many, military might evokes a sense of security. However, when considering this question from a foreign policy standpoint, does current military spending really match the current level of threats faced by the United States, or are too many dollars being allocated for an unnecessary level of military strength? There are certainly cons in making the decision to drastically lower military spending, but they are minimal when compared to the positive ramifications such a decision would have. This paper aims to explore these pros and cons
The United States is an extremely affluent country, however, the U.S. government does not allocate its funds correctly. The government spends entirely too much of the budget on military spending. A segment of the military budget should go towards education. Education is completely undervalued in America and is often pushed to the side in political debates. Conversely, several of the top-ranked countries in education are also flourishing economically. Even though the U.S. is struggling to compete in education, the government has all but given up at this point. There are no signs of increased education spending or a decrease in military spending. How is this country supposed to continue to grow and move forward if the citizens
With the combination of better work ethic, enforced spending restrictions, and constant supervision, people on welfare could have a true second chance in life, without our current form of government assistance coddling them from achieving their potential. Some people just need a push in the right direction before they can soar through the air. If we start to pride people with work ethic, more will duplicate this action striving for praise as well. If we educate the future generation on the actual reasons for welfare, they might listen and create a difference. We need to make a difference, to save ourselves, to save our country, and to save the world from becoming a completely dependent society. Save our country, improve welfare.
I agree with this statement, and it frustrates me to no end. Our country is screwed up in every direction one looks. People are starving while others have too much money to spend. Our population is out of control. We pollute to no end. Ours is one of the best countries in the world? Society’s tumors seem to keep growing but I want them to end. These problems disturbed me to the point of depression when I discovered them but now I can handle my knowledge. One thing that has helped me is learning about American history. I thought that we teetered on the brink of imminent collapse with budget, environmental, and social problems, but I have learned about the problems that America has dealt with over the years. Now I know that this time period is no worse than the past.
Other solutions that we have is to reform the whole welfare act or even get rid of it and create a new one. David Ellwood has been working on something like this “to replace welfare by expanding a tiny refundable tax credit” (172 Edin) by doing this Ellwood is actually having success of getting the poor back into society. Everyone goes through hard times and we never know when those times may come for us. As we look into all of our solutions we see that what Ellwood is doing is working but one thing we have not fixed is how hard it is to receive the welfare and help without using all of your time to do
Imagine a ten year old innocent girl, her parents whom she dearly loved slaughtered in front of her, her siblings being sold into prostitution, slavery or to guerrilla forces as child soldiers. Rape, theft, murder, genocides and other injustice doing is her daily “playground”. Now stop imaging, the common American seems to be oblivious to current events going on worldwide, because such girls exist in war torn places such as Iraq, Syria and Democratic Republic of Congo. If Conscription, the practice of ordering people by law to serve the armed forces were enforced then we might not have to let ten year old girls endure such hardship. Conscription is being used in countries like Switzerland, Austria and Finland, their citizens will never have
...hose that need them it is impossible. If the government is going to provide things it needs money to do so, and where does that money come from, taxes. Therefore the medication, housing, food and other benefits allotted to those on the welfare system are paid for by masses who actually do work and make something of themselves. Those receiving those benefits either don’t see or don’t care about the cost it puts on the rest of society, and fall into the hole of letting life come to you on the silver platter at the cost of someone else. Hard work is something considered antique, a thing of our grandparents with too many willing to forsake it for a life that isn’t of the highest quality but is of the lowest effort. The rise of the welfare state spells the end of America as we know it, the end of the “land of opportunity” and the beginning of the land of poverty.