Military Infrastructure Essay

Infrastructure -

Infrastructure personnel (i.e., military personnel, volunteers, etc.) were responsible for post-disaster rehabilitation. They cleared debris from the roads, streets, and airport landings that occurred during the initial earthquake and its aftershocks. They also assessed and demolished unstable structures and helped with the reconstruction of buildings, bridges, and roads.

Medical -

Medical personnel (i.e., paramedics, doctors, etc.) from the local, regional, or national government, military, non-profit organizations and volunteers were responsible for assisting local victims who were wounded during the earthquake disaster and those that became ill or wounded post-disaster during humanitarian relief efforts. They helped

They coordinated, collaborated, and provided oversight for post-disaster humanitarian operations. They also provided guidance and disseminated public information regarding ongoing disaster relief efforts.

Security -

Security personnel (i.e., military personnel) had a primary responsibility to secure the area, protecting local victims and creating safe working conditions for post-disaster humanitarian operations. They provided management, discipline, and organization to ensure all personnel and scarce resources (such as food, water, medicine, and funds) were protected and secure. They were also peacekeepers, mediating conflict and calming personnel during periods of uncertainty.

Resources & Assets -

Logistics personnel (i.e., military personnel, non-profit organizations, volunteers, etc.) were responsible for the procurement and transportation of goods and funds. They also received and tracked donations and provided asset management for all resources received during the post-disaster humanitarian operations.

Transport

Provided personnel for emergency response

e. Obtained donations from local and international donors; and tracked items until they reached the victims

a. Provided a fraction of their budget for emergency aid

b. Provided personnel for emergency response

c. Obtained donations from local donors

In comparison, the Red Cross / IFRS was more effective than the RSS because they had several years of experience with disaster management amidst readily available personnel and resources; whereas, the RSS only had experience with managing policies and donations of seized goods. To avoid duplicate efforts, the RSS could manage receiving the donations and the Red Cross / IFRS could use their personnel and resources to distribute them to the respective areas in need using their elaborate tracking method

1. The main disaster management resources were destroyed.

a. Military personnel would assume security responsibilities and secure the area; providing protection for victims, securing resources, and conducting search and rescue operations.

b. In the future, partnerships with local, regional, and national committees should be developed and maintained to provide emergency management operations in the event that the local support is