More handpicked essays just for you.
Why the military should not reinstate the draft
Why the military should not reinstate the draft
Pros and cons of the military draft
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The United States ended the military draft in 1973 and since then the military has relied on volunteer men and women to fight for our country. Americans have been questioning whether or not people are physically and mentally prepared to meet the needs of the United States military. The United States should reinstate the military draft. First of all, many civilians take the freedom they have for granted. If they serve in the military, it may help them realize how much advantage they have for living in a country that has freedom. The draft will help Americans not be so entitled and help them appreciate how much the military has done for the United States. All citizens have the obligation to serve this country when the need arises. In addition, …show more content…
compulsory military service for men and women would bring our “tribal” society together. It would bring people with different religions, ethics and races together and fight for our country as one. Society would be physically and mentally fit young men and women ready to work alongside a diverse group of people. Therefore, the United States should reinstate the military draft to bring our country together and help civilians appreciate the freedom that the soldiers have provided. The military draft will help the United States.
For example, men and women who had disciplinary problems in school could be drafted into the military and learn discipline from basic training and even war. It will help our troubled men and women learn respect and determination. There are many benefits for going into the military. First, the military will pay for a person's whole college tuition so they can pursue a higher level of education. It also provides health and dental care for the soldier and their family as well as getting paid each month and many more benefits. Recently, studies have shown that only 20% of volunteer Americans are qualified to fight for our country which could lead to lack of soldiers so if there is a draft, it could bring up the number of soldiers in the military. Many people are talking about how they are against reinstating the draft because they want to go to college to be a doctor or another high level career and if they are fighting in the war then they will not have time to go to college, but what people need to understand is that if you are enrolled in college you do not have to be drafted. Therefore, there are many benefits with reinstating the draft. Lastly, it will also allow the United States to be a much healthier country; more people will be in the military which leads to more healthy men and women working out and being healthy. Freedom is a privilege so everyone should work for it and earn …show more content…
it. Even though reinstating the draft would benefit the United States, it also has some downfalls.
In the U.S. every American citizen has their own rights; whether it is freedom of religion, speech and even choice. Americans have the choice to do whatever they want, so if they do not want to participate in the military and go to war then they should not be forced to. Men and women should not be forced to do something that they are not comfortable with. Many Americans want to pursue in higher education; if they go to war they it could lack the chance of them pursuing their dream if they are busy serving the country. The United States is known as the ‘Land of the Free’ which means that Americans are free to make any decision they want. Many argue that reinstating the military draft would not help the military at all; it would just add more men and women rather than making a better army. To conclude, fighting for the military should be a decision based off of every American whether than being forced into
serving. Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution states that Americans “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy… To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia…” This connects to the reinstatement of the draft because it clearly states that Americans should support the armies and fight for our country. This shows that the United States should reinstate the draft among 18 year olds. A court case that connects to this situation is Arver v. United States because this was known as the Selective Draft Law Case which upheld the military draft in the United States. This court case was so that the United States could rapidly increase the strength of the armed forces. Therefore, the military draft should reintroduce the draft in the United States. As a result, if the United States reintroduces the military draft if will allow many benefits into this country. It will provide pride in the entitled civilians who need to appreciate how much freedom they have as well as allowing the militaries number of soldiers so that the American military can be as strong and secure as ever. It will provide many benefits like paying for college tuition which will lead into less student debt among college students and also allow our country to become more diverse if people with different races and ethics all serve the country together. Lastly, it will allow the United States to become more united as one country.
An accountant might not be very great at shooting an aiming, but he will help the government budget the money to purchase more guns and weapons. Then again, a renound marksman would be better in combat, or even someone who went to a state shooting event and won over the whole state. Any one in shooting sports in fact! They'd be good at aiming and hitting. Someone with people skills could communicate for the army, but maybe she can't do the technical stuff of getting radio signals enough to make the phone calls and emails. The draft eliminates the ability for Americans to choose, and they are forced to serve in the military, when if they had a choice they might pick something still very helpful, but not dangerous or completely obnoxious for them. By reinstating the draft the government would kill the freedom of choice, everyone has a relatable skill set that could in some way benefit the government or military. So if the draft did come back, maybe they could change it so you can pick which job you'd like to train
Every American is Free, and because of many others, are safe. They are able to lay their head down on a pillow and go to sleep knowing that they aren’t going to be shot by soldiers of a different country in their sleep. They don’t have to hide inside their houses and watch fighter vehicles crawl by and wonder if they are going to live to see the sun rise the next day. They are safe because there are men and women over in different countries killing those that threaten our existence. If there was ever a debate about reinstating the draft, I think the answer would be yes, do it because there would be that many more people fighting to keep us safe, those that maybe debated it before would go through with it, and the troubled teens that rebel against
People who support the military draft will say that it is the obligation of every citizen of the United States, and every other person residing in the United States, who is between the ages of 18 and 42, to perform a period of national service. Aren?t there many other ways--less deadly ways--to contribute to the country?s well being? Should we, as citizens, be allowed to evade this ultimate obligation by turning it over to the poorer members of society, those who can't find good-paying jobs or training except in the military? In "A War for Us, Fought by Them," William Broyles, a Vietnam war veteran and the father of a young man who is a soldier in the Marines, argues that the military draft should be brought back, and this time it should be done right: everybody should be drafted, not just ?the profoundly patriotic or the economically needy" (Broyles 695).
Ever since the first war involving America started, there have been countless discussions on who should fight for our country. There are talks of age, gender, and if the service should be voluntary or not. In America, serving is voluntary, although, in other countries, it is not. The service should stay voluntary in America because if not, it would go against freedom and it would be a source of newfound problems within our country. Also, if youth took off two years of their lives to serve, they would not gain experience to work in the fields that need more work force.
Therefore, if the majority of the nation isn’t going to do anything to be proud of, why should they have the chance to do anything? Well if we are going to make young Americans serve to protect this country to keep it free from the horrors of the world, we as citizens should take notice and appreciate it and live life to its fullest potential and make something of ourselves. The draft may be something that would be very beneficial to the American society, it may be just
Generally, reinstating the Constitutional draft would solidify the meaning of being an American citizen. Often, wealthier and more privileged people are able to ask for exemption from serving, which makes representation of soldiers in combat composed of less-privileged citizens. With compulsory conscription, all American citizens, men or women, ages 18-26 are subject to be recruited for the armed forces. In fact, only 4 members of the 107th Congress who voted in favor of the Iraq war had children serving there. Politicians would know how it feels to have loved ones in a war, instead of freely speaking about wartime without experiencing it in any way.1 Moreover, Americans feel that public support for war in foreign countries is not strong because the soldiers fighting are p...
In the year 1944, US Legislation passed the Servicemen’s Readjustment act, commonly known as the GI Bill of Rights. It is one of the most significant pieces of legislation ever produced by the federal government; one that impacted the United States socially, economically and politically. The GI Bill offers a comprehensive package of benefits, including financial assistance for higher education for veterans of U.S. military service. The benefits of the GI Bill are intended to help veterans readjust to civilian life following service to their country and to encourage bright, motivated men and women to volunteer for military duty. Many factors and contributions have gone into the development of the GI Bill, and it has changed over the years. This research paper will introduce the reader to a brief history of the formation and evolution of the GI Bill, discuss the current benefits that it offers to student populations in response to their specific needs, and introduce current implications that the GI Bill has placed on student veterans and institutions across the nation.
I never thought I would say this but I think we should reinstate the draft. It has been years since we have wanted or needed a draft, but in view of the United States being attacked on September 11, 2001, I feel our country must be ready and prepared to defend itself. If being prepared means reinstating the draft, a mandatory summons for military service, then I think we should consider this a reasonable proposal. I think the tragic events of September 11 will evoke most people to agree with me. Since September 11 we have seen a surge of patriotism in this country that seemed hidden for many years. I am so glad patriotism was not lost, and I think most Americans would be willing to defend their country in light of this attack. We are a nation and a people who believe in freedom and democracy. It tells other nations who we are and what we stand for. It is these beliefs that lead me to believe that the people of the United States will do anything to preserve our freedom and democracy even if it means reinstating the draft. I want to prove this notion, but am unsure how to accomplish this. I have not read any recent articles in newspapers or magazines that have dealt with this issue. My textbook was not a source either. So I decided to do two things. First, I went to the Internet for any information, articles, discussions, or statements relating to this issue. Second, I decided to conduct an informal poll. This informal poll consisted of male and female respondents with an age span of eighteen to sixty two. My poll started with classmates in my Western Civilization and Studio Art classes and the professors who instruct these classes. My poll included emailing friends and family who live and work in New York, family currently serving in the Armed Forces, and a family member who is a Veteran of the Viet Nam War. Also included in this poll is a random sampling of the townspeople of Los Alamos. Medical personnel at Los Alamos Women’s Health Services, and the lunch crowd at Café’ Allegro rounded out my poll. This cross section of Americans evoked many feelings and opinions and stimulated many conversations and critical thought. These conversations exhilarated me and the results I obtained amazed me.
“First, conscription doesn’t save much cash. It costs money to manage and enforce a draft- history demonstrates that not every inductee would go quietly. Conscripts serve shorter terms and reenlist less frequently, increasing turnover, which is expensive. And unless the government instituted a Czarist lifetime draft, everyone beyond the first ranks would continue to expect to be paid” (Forbes). Even though “The military not only provides training in a range of specialties; it also offers educational benefits for veterans-- including many from underprivileged back grounds-- that might not be available under a mandatory
Over forty years has passed since the United States inducted the last draftee through the Selective Service System. The Selective Service System is an independent agency of the United States, which gives the President the right or power to conscript men for military service. There have been different Acts passed by congress since 1917 that require men of various ages to register for service. Although, the name of each Act and the age requirements of the registries changed, the Acts were all similar in nature. They all gave the President the right to call men to war when he deemed necessary. In January 1973, Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird announced the creation of the all-volunteer service, retracting the need for the draft (GAO.gov). Under current law, all men between the ages of 18-25 must register within 30 days of their 18th birthday, however this information is used mostly for recruitment purposes and in case of any future crisis. There has been much controversy over this matter since the Vietnam War, when people started to realize the draft was unfair due to loopholes and draft exemptions making the draft unfair for working men. At one point in time the military draft may have been necessary, but today’s all-volunteer military has eliminated the need for a draft.
..., the draft ended and the U.S. converted to an All-Volunteer military. Many people were not in high spirits about the Vietnam War, and thought we should not be involved in it. Lyndon Johnson, the 36th president of the United States, laments “[w]e are not about to send American boys nine or ten thousand miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves” (Vietnam-Facts.info). There is a popular picture of a draft protests sign displaying the words “hell no, we won’t go.” I do believe Americans should have a right to choose to go to war or not. Many young men lost their life fighting a battle they didn’t even have faith in. Many soldiers endured personal hardships, loss of income, and leaving family behind. Most of drafted soldiers complied with the draft and served; however, many middle to high-class young men found ways to avoid combat.
...itary conscription in the name of freedom is an illegitimate, criminal organization. A government that is willing to enslave people cannot be trusted to protect your liberty. A government that forces people to fight for its goals, its protection, and its benefit has created a morally perverse situation where there is no free society left to defend” (Boldin). Another thing we must look at is without an overflow of troops; “unpopular wars are very difficult to fight. The ability to use conscription actually encourages politicians to wage even more wars;the massive resources are a temptation that is hard for the war-lover to resist. When the draft was finally undermined in the 1970′s, for example, the Vietnam War ended” (Boldin).
There are plenty of arguments for why the draft is wrong and unlawful, or even unconstitutional. When it comes down to basics, sending people involuntarily to war does sound pretty far from freedom of choice, but there is more to it than that. Understanding that it is a free country is one thing, but freedom comes at a price. Everyone wants to be free but not everyone realizes that there are times when we must fight to maintain our well-earned freedom. It is impossible in some cases to fight a full- blown war with just a volunteer army, and if it threatens our freedom, than we must fight the war with volunteers and draftees alike. In technicality, it may be wrong, but realistically, there are many times when a draft really is needed, and if run the correct way, it can be very effective.
When ordering a draft that essentially forces millions of soldiers into the field of a battle they may not want to fight in, the government may want to consider several factors of what is considered “fit to fight.” The U.S. has used the draft only a few times in American history, however the last time it was used, in the Vietnam War, it was considered highly disastrous, as the war had little to no support. When imposing such an unwanted draft, the government should overall consider three main factors: the mental capability of the person going into battle, the physical abilities and limitations the person may have, and the person's religious, political and moral values that may hold them back from fully contributing to the war effort. Essentially, as the draft forces young men into the armed services for a war they may or may not believe in, the government should take extra careful measures in who they choose to draft or not draft. When soldiers go into battle, they are using their full mental, physical, and emotional capacity in order to just stay sane, as they live and breathe through the horrors of the everyday life of war.
I know your belief in conscription is a big thing but in a way it is a cruel thing. Against someone’s will sending him or her away to fight in a war that they may not believe in in the first place. Conscription in a war where fighting for your country is a good cause however fighting for someone’s beliefs is completely different.