Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stalin's key social reforms
Attempts and reforms of Gorbachev
Gorbachevs reforms essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stalin's key social reforms
When Mikhail Gorbachev assumed control of the Soviet Union upon the death of Konstantin Chernenko in 1985, the nation was in a deep hole dug by Stalin’s past regime. Though Stalin had been dead for decades, his successors had done little to reverse the results of his tyrannical rule. The Soviet Union was left in a state which barely resembled communism at all, and could best be described as repressive totalitarian control. The whole of the Union was under a thick fog of censorship, oppression, and economic stagnation. Under previous regimes’ heavy-handed monitoring of Russians, freedom of expression was essentially a fairy tale; press was controlled by the government, books criticizing communism or Soviet leaders were censored, and outside …show more content…
He soon devised a new branch of his perestroika called glasnost. Translating to “openness”, glasnost was a dramatic restructuring of the overbearing censorship of previous Soviet administrations. Under this new system, citizens were encouraged to not only discuss Soviet government and leaders, but to openly criticize them. The press had newfound freedom to report on stories that previously would have been silenced, and soon newspapers such as Pravda began covering massive Soviet failures like the Chernobyl disaster. The arts flourished as well; Western influence spread to Russia, particularly evident in the rising popularity of rock and jazz music, and censored books from past decades began to …show more content…
Because of the extreme diversity of the Soviet Union’s satellite nations - having 92 different nationalities and over 100 recognized languages - ethnic tensions were high under the unified, Russian-centric government. The heavy-handed, oppressive regimes of previous decades did well to quell any potential uprisings from satellites, but under Gorbachev’s lax rule of openness, pressure began to rise. Within a year of Gorbachev legalizing the creation of other political parties, all 15 Soviet satellites had revolted against Soviet rule and voted for complete independence. By the end of 1991, the Soviet Union ceased to exist, Gorbachev had resigned, and Boris Yeltsin had taken over as the new president of
The Legacy of Russia and the Soviet Union - Authoritarian and Repressive Traditions that Refuse to Die
At 7:32 p.m. December 25, 1991, the Soviet flag was lowered from the Kremlin in Moscow for the last time and replaced with the pre-revolutionary Russian flag, which symbolized the disintegration of Soviet Union. Early in the day, the last president of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, resigned his post, and Boris Yeltsin became the president of the newly independent Russian state. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the campaign between the Soviet Union and the United States ended. Nonetheless, although the end of the Cold War makes people around the world enter a peaceful time, until now both people in the past and historians are amazed why the previous powerful Soviet Union collapsed suddenly. Thereby, the cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union is still an everlasting and popular topic in the world.
The most powerful communist country in history, the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics, also known as the Soviet Union. Although being the biggest country the world has come to know, the country’s domestic struggles led to its downfall. Others suggest the Union’s desperation to outperform the United States of America in military and space flight led to excessive spending and in the end, stagnation. Moreover after decades of repressive communist rule, domestic attitudes towards the governments went to their all-time lows and led to the population’s unrest. Economic and political issues failed to get prioritized and continued to get ignored. Mikhal Gorbachev, the last leader of the USSR, introduced his plans, attempting to change the flaws of their government while keeping the same fundamentals of Communism. In the end, his plans backfired and the population used its new found freedom of speech, given to them by Gorbachev, against the communist government.
The cold war was failed by the Soviet Union for many reasons, including the sudden collapse of communism (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) This sudden collapse of communism was brought on ultimately by internal factors. The soviet unions president Gorbachev’s reforms: glasnost (openness) and perestroika (political reconstructering) ultimately caused the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev’s basics for glasnost were the promotion of principles of freedom to criticize; the loosening of controls on media and publishing; and the freedom of worship. His essentials of perestroika were, a new legislature; creation of an executive presidency; ending of the ‘leading role’ of the communist party; allowing state enterprises to sell part of their product on the open market; lastly, allowing foreign companies to own Soviet enterprises (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) Gorbachev believed his reforms would benefit his country, but the Soviet Union was ultimately held together by the soviet tradition he was trying to change. The Soviet Union was none the less held together by “…powerful central institutions, pressure for ideological conformity, and the threat of force.
"For hundreds of years, dictators have ruled Russia. Do they still? In the late 1980s, Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev launched a series of political reforms that eventually allowed for competitive elections, the emergence of an independent press, the formation of political parties, and the sprouting of civil society. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, these proto-democratic institutions endured in an independent Russia" (McFual). However history has shown how Russia has always been an anti-democratic country; power having shifted to authoritarian rule under both the Communists and the Russian Tsars. Under the previous authoritarian rule, Russian citizens were stripped of their rights and freedoms, but in t...
In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became the General Secretary of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union. Gorbachev held this position from 1985 to 1991. Gorbachev’s influence and l...
Russia is generally apportioned the benefit of having introduced a political phenomenon that basically provided an alternative for capitalism; communism. Since this concept was only set in motion at the turn of the 20th century, we can therefore deduce that, to a large extent, Russia is, to most people, synonymous with leaders such as Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and Gorbachev. This supposition is entirely based on the premise that the Russian revolution of 1914 inherently altered the socio-cultural and socio-political direction of the nation, bringing into birth a never before envisioned era where Russia was not ruled by the Tsars, but by simple men; men who spoke to and articulated the needs of the masses. To this extent, communism, therefore, is largely misconceived as having been the fulcrum of Russia’s civilization. Much of this misconception , as signaled earlier, is based on the growth and progression of the Russian society in the years after the revolution until 1990, when the Berlin wall fell, essentially bringing down with it decades of Soviet Union tradition based on communism.
... in turmoil, and rebellions broke out in Poland and Hungary, largely because of the uncertainty whether destalinization meant the abrogation of key aspects of the Stalin regime or merely reforms designed to dress the familiar features of Stalinism in more attractive garb. It now seems clear that his heirs meant to leave intact many of the basic elements of the system. Stalin's method of personal rule was replaced by group rule and more orderly processes of government, the terror apparatus was largely dismantled, the economy was notably modernized, and foreign policy was conducted with much greater diplomatic initiative and flexibility. But the Soviet leadership continued to cling tenaciously to the authoritarian system of party supremacy that shapes every aspect of life in the Soviet Union and to Soviet dominance over the Communist countries on its western borders.
The purpose of this investigation is to assess how significant Mikhail Gorbachev’s Glasnost, and Perestroika polices contribute to the collapse of the USSR. In order to understand how significant of a factor Gorbachev policies were to the collapse of the USSR, we will investigate from how significant were the reforms emplaced by Gorbachev, to how the USSR was doing economically from the time Gorbachev came into power. The main sources for this investigation range from an Excerpt from The cold war: The United States and the Soviet union by Ronald Powaski who states facts about both the economic and political issues of the time. Excerpts from “New political thinking” from perestroika by Gorbachev which states how he believes new political ideas are for the good for the USSR. Finally in The Dissolution of the Soviet Union by Myra Immell who goes over many of the factors of the USSR’s collapse.
In conclusion, the chaos that was encountered by t the Soviet Union together with the ideas the new leaders brought in enlightenment Eastern Europe about communism. This made the countries understand their freedom and rights through the Glasnot. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to the freedom and independence of many soviet states. They were no longer a world super power and with the difficulties it faced economically, politically and socially, led to its own downfall. The collapse of communism in the Soviet Union also led to the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe as the countries became democratic.
Rethinking the Soviet Experience. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. Gorbachev and Glasnost: viewpoints from the Soviet press. Isaac J. Tarasulo, Ph.D.
Edmund Liu Jesse O’Dell Russian 90BW From Stalin to Khrushchev: A Transition from Terror to Reform Soviet society under the leadership of Nikita Khrushchev presents a stark contrast to the oppressed and fearful society controlled by Joseph Stalin. While Stalin’s government preferred the use of strong-arming, brutal punishments, and an atmosphere of fear, Khrushchev sought a relaxation of draconian social policies and censorship laws. This shift from the totalitarian style of Stalin, coined De-Stalinization, was necessary. Khrushchev’s ushered in an era De-Stalinization, marked by a liberalization of culture and greater freedoms for Soviet citizens and improved living standards for Soviet citizens.