Microsoft Vs. Government

1466 Words3 Pages

Microsoft Vs. Government

After much research concerning the case of Microsoft v. the government we as a group have decided that our presidential candidate should support governmental intervention concerning Microsoft’s monopolizing business practices. The overwhelming amount of evidence against the unlawful tactics that Microsoft uses to gain complete control of the computer market proves that something must be done to allow more competition in the industry. Such an intervention could possibly stimulate more employment, greater opportunity for radical innovation, and increased probability for lower prices. We will argue this claim with evidence acquired via the Internet and various periodicals. Though there may be substantial amount information that may defend Microsoft’s legitimacy, the claims against Microsoft and those who are being negatively affected stand to outweigh the positive attributes considerably.

The key issue is what should the government do about the monopolizing strategies of Microsoft. The entities that have a stake in the outcomes are Microsoft’s competition like Sun Micro Systems, Real Networks, Netscape and the general public as well as the government. The companies that are competing are affected because they want to get their specific products circulating in the market but are unable to do so because of the monopoly created by Microsoft. With more business competition the general public will benefit because of the increased probability of price wars and more opportunity for critical innovation in the industry. Also, the eventual decision made by the government concerning the future of Microsoft will play a key role in future public approval ratings.

Empirically speaking, the companies, an...

... middle of paper ...

... create an unhealthy, unbalanced market place for computer and computer software industry. The consequences are too dire to let Microsoft go on like it has in the past. In conclusion, something has to be done to create a more healthy business environment for all people affected by this case.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The Microsoft Defense Site, “Microsoft Trial is fueled by Envy”

The Ayn Rand Institute, January 25, 2004.

<http://microsoft.aynrand.org/envy.html>

The Microsoft Defense Site, Edwin A Locke

The Ayn Rand Institute, January 25, 2004

http://microsoft.aynrand.org/letter.html

The Microsoft Defense Site, “Antitrust assault on Microsoft is Immoral”

The Ayn Rand Institute, January 25, 2004

http://microsoft.aynrand.org/pr1.html

Statement by Ralph Nader, and James Love, November, 1997

Cyrus Afzail, www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/333321

Open Document