Michael Sandel: An Analysis Of Democracy's Discontent

820 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on affordable care act

In Chapter 7 of Democracy’s Discontent, Michael Sandel discusses the Progressive Era and social reform of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Sandel describes the era as being divided into 3 visions: decentralization, nationalist, and consumerist. I would argue that the vision of decentralization informed the anti-chain store movement, but the anti-trust movement was influenced by both the consumerist and decentralization visions. The criticisms of “too-big-to-fail” banks are the decentralized vision and the Affordable Care Act can be seen as both the nationalist and consumerist visions.
First, the “decentralization” vision was popularized by Louis Brandeis. It advocates deindustrialization on the grounds that it limits self-government among citizens. This makes the same republican virtue arguments that Sandel himself makes. Government should not regulate trusts for the benefit of workers or consumers. Rather, the state should ban monopolies and break up trusts in order to promote competition among firms. It is important that businesses be local and independent in order to preserve the people’s democratic control over the government.
The “nationalist” vision is distinct because, while it is uncomfortable with industrialization, it doesn’t believe that deindustrialization is possible or preferable to the status quo. This vision, advocated by Theodore Roosevelt, argued that the negative effects of industrial capitalism could be countered by increasing the role of the state in the economy. Roosevelt said in 1910, “Big Business has become nationalized,” and therefore the only course of action would be for the government to literally nationalize big business.
Last, the “consumerist” vision was more concerned with plig...

... middle of paper ...

...einvestment in the community and more stable. This mirrors the decentralization vision because it values smaller economic entities that are locally owned . The farm subsidy debate also reflects this vision. Farm subsidies often go to large agribusiness firms rather than small farmers. This forces independent farmers out of the market and concentrates economic power which limits self-government.
In conclusion, Sandel frames the Progressive Era into 3 visions: decentralization (which mirrors his own arguments for independent producers to promote morality), consumerist (which argues for safe and cheap consumer goods), and nationalist (which achieves better conditions for workers through government regulation). The decentralized vision represents the anti-chain store, antitrust and anti-farm subsidy movements. The consumerist vision represents the antitrust movement.

Show More
Related

  • Judd And Swanstrom: Chapter Analysis

    1387 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...l to readers to see how the reform movement played a major role in better health and labor standards across many cities in the United States. By giving more focus to these positive elements, I thought it could have made for a very interesting contrast between pros and cons for the reform movement, similar to what readers received while reading about machine politics in Chapter 3.

    Read More

  • American Colossus The Triumph Of Capitalism Summary

    1553 Words  | 4 Pages

    In American Colossus: The Triumph of Capitalism, 1865 - 1900, H.W. Brands worked to write a book that illustrates the decades after the Civil War, focusing on Morgan and his fellow capitalists who effected a stunning transformation of American life. Brands focuses on the threat of capitalism in American democracy. The broader implications of focusing on capitalism in American democracy is the book becomes a frame work based on a contest between democracy and capitalism. He explains democracy depends on equality, whereas, capitalism depends on inequality (5). The constant changing of the classes as new technologies and ways of life arise affect the contest between democracy and capitalism. By providing a base argument and the implications of the argument, Brands expresses what the book attempts to portray. Through key pieces of evidence Brands was able to provide pieces of synthesis, logical conclusion, and countless

    Read More

  • The Capitalists Who Shaped Post-Civil War America

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    characterizes the capitalists who shaped post-Civil War industrial America and it is valid that they would be properly distinguished as corrupt “robber barons”.

    Read More

  • 19th Century's Industrialists: Robber Barons or Industrial Statesmen?

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    Industrial development of the late 18th century (around 1865-1900) is often characterized by it’s affluent, aggressive and monopolistic industrial leaders of the likes of men such as Andrew Carnegie, William H. Vanderbilt, and John D. Rockefeller. Due to their ruthless strategies, utilization of trusts, and exploitation of cheap labor in order to garner nearly unbreakable monopolies and massive sums of wealth, these men are often labelled as “robber barons”. At the same time, they are also often referred to as “industrial statements” for their organization, and catalyst of, industrial development; not to forget their generous contributions to the betterment of American society. Therefore, whether or not their aforementioned advances in industry were undertaken for their own personal benefits, one cannot ignore their positive effects on America. Thus, one can conclude that not only were the captains of industry both “robber barons” and “industrial statements”, but that that these two labels, in fact, go hand-in-hand.

    Read More

  • Progressive Presidents: Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Progressive Movement that occurred during the early 20th century was a time of major reform in the United States of America. During this time, there was a group of activists that referred to themselves as the Progressives, and they sought to change society for the people. The way that they intended to do this was change through their ideals of democracy, efficiency, regulation, and social justice. With this movement came the election that changed the course of America’s history “…demonstrating a victory for progressive reforms as both Progressive candidates accounted for 75 percent of all the votes” (Bowles). The candidates in this election were Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson.

    Read More

  • The Effects of American Reform Movements in the 1900s

    2279 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the late 1800’s a group of Americans decided that something needed to be done about the decline of moral and ethical values in most Americans. These people called themselves the progressives and started one of the most comprehensive reform movements in the United States to this day. Progressivism became so widespread that by the end of World War I, anyone who didn’t agree with Progressive ideals was labeled a communist. The Progressives had four major goals that they wished to accomplish. These four goals were to democratize America, to Americanize America, the humanization of capitalism and rationalization of the economy. Each goal dealt with a different aspect of America’s society that the Progressives thought needed help. The way these goals were accomplished was to get laws passed that would reform the practices of many Americans. Progressives held that in order to bring American back to its old time, rural values people would need to attend church more.

    Read More

  • To what Extent the Progressive Movement was Successful

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the beginning of the twentieth century, the economy was booming, new technology flourished. The rapid industrialization brought achievement to the United States, however, it also caused several social problems. Wealth and power were concentrated in the hands of a few, and poverty and political corruption were widespread. As people became aware of these problems, a new reform group was created. Unlike populism, which had been a group of farmers grown desperate as the economy submerged into depression, the new reform movement arose from the educated middle class. These people were known as the progressives. The Progressive Movement was a movement that aimed at solving political, economic, and social problems. The Progressives were people from the middle class who had confidence that they could achieve social progress through political reform. The Progressives sought after changes and improvements in the society through laws and other federal actions.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Progressive Era And The New Deal Era

    1652 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thesis The Progressive Era and the New Deal Era had a significant amount of similarities with policies and programs to reform the American society and improve lives and fight poverty in America. Although the Progressive and New Deal Era had many similarities, there were still differences between them. Both the Progressive and the New Deal Era’s main goal was to improve American society. Both of the Progressive and New Deal’s accomplishments were rooted in the economic depression and the need for change before the era, the Guilded age in the 19th century for the Progressive era, and the Great Depression for the New Deal era. As the Guilded Age was ending, and the Progressive Era was emerging, most American families had to live with the harsh reality of sweatshops, slums, child labor, corruption in government and businesses, disease, and racial prejudice.

    Read More

  • The Populists and Progressives

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the late 19th and early 20th century both the Populist Party and Progressive movement wanted to preserve some things, while also addressing the need for reform. Although many of the ideas and goals of these “Third parties” were initially not legislated and considered far-fetched, many of these ideas later became fundamental laws throughout American history. The Populists and Progressives were both grass roots movements, and addressed the needs of the poor and powerless, for the Populists it was farmers and for the Progressives it was urban lower and middle class workers. These two movements attempted to bring the powerless peoples issues to national politics. The Populists and Progressives wanted to preserve some American ideals of the past, such as a sense of community and the ability for farmers and workers to live happily without economic strains. Populists were more oriented to the plight of the farmer while the Progressives included women's rights, and protection of the consumer and labor.

    Read More

  • Socialism In The Progressive Era Essay

    2093 Words  | 5 Pages

    This paper proposes to argue that the rise of Socialism in American society was due in large part to the reaction to the disenchantment of American citizens with their governments and the effect industrialization had on society. This historian proposes that while the victim of a great deal of opposition, the Socialist movement contributed to a number of the reforms made during the Progressive era. The historical evidence will show that many of the beliefs that drove the reforms of the era were propagated by individuals and groups associated with the Socialist movement in America, and that it affected all geographical regions of the United States, though some more than others. Ultimately the goal is to show how Socialism, despite being considered in some circle anathema to being American, was heavily involved in shaping society in the twenti...

    Read More

  • A History of the Progressive Party in the United States

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Henry J. S. (2010).The Progressive Era: The Great Age of Reform. Retrieved January, 5th, 2013, fromhttp://www.academicamerican.com/progressive/topics/progressive.html

    Read More

  • The Progresive Reform Movement

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Progressive Reform Movement played an instrumental role in uplifting American society to new heights. The movement was fairly successful in curing the ills brought on by the massive industrial growth of the late 19th century. Rich executives who had created monopolies and trusts were deemed to have become too powerful, and political imbalances were ruled to be unacceptable. Progressive reform was a cornerstone of the early 1900s and was the issue that defined several presidencies.

    Read More

  • Industrialization and Immigration

    2270 Words  | 5 Pages

    Large corporations used this to their advantage. Profit oriented leaders did little to make suitable working conditions. With the aid of Muckrakers, journalists who exposed the underside of American life, the nation began to understand the "evils" of industrialization (599). More and more did Americans escalate their concern for reforms. The reformists promoting the ideals of Progressivism were moralists and championed the ideals of human rights. Progressivism embraced a widespread, many-sided effort after 1900 to build a better soc...

    Read More

  • New Freedom Vs. New Nationalism

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    In "New Nationalism", a thought on the role of government in Big Business is that there should be more control.

    Read More

  • Socialism - The Best Economic System

    1465 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.

    Read More

More about Michael Sandel: An Analysis Of Democracy's Discontent

Open Document