Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences between Mexico and the USA
Differences between Mexico and the USA
Differences between Mexico and the USA
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Differences between Mexico and the USA
The United States has held beliefs that Mexico’s legal system is not functional regarding the nature and function of their system. However, the Mexican government does in fact have a highly evolved and organized legal system with few exceptions to its functionality (Stende-Berger, 2015). Mexico’s legal system was based on French, Greek, and Roman legal systems (Stende-Berger, 2015). Their legal system is fairly common with other countries throughout the world but the United States legal system is significantly different (Stende-Berger, 2015). In the United States most businesses and foreign owned corporations do not have to work through the legal system, where in Mexico they would have to directly deal with the legal system (Stende-Berger, …show more content…
The legal rights themselves are created and defined by substantive law. There’s a different set of rules that will generally govern criminal procedure and civil procedure, or the specific procedure followed in trials and in appeals. Federal rules for civil procedure regulate actions in the federal court system (Cornell University Law School, 2015). Procedural law is made up of state or federal statutes established by constitutional law of the United States (Cornell University Law School, 2015). Specifically, the particular provisions ensure due process of law in the United States. Similarly, the Mexican government has a Mexican Constitution that governs how they will deal with procedural law (Stende-Berger, 2015). The United States bases their common law system on case law and statutory law and was derived from England in the American colonies before the American Revolution (Stende-Berger, 2015). Case law is based on customs and usage rather than legislative enactments. In contrast, the Mexico civil law system was derived from Roman law and uses codes and statues of the Emperor Justinian, called Corpus Juris Civilis (Stende-Berger, 2015). For years, Mexico’s civil law system and the United States law differed with the use of codification, the use of Civil Code and Commercial Code (Stende-Berger, 2015). However, there is no longer a distinction between the two legal systems. The United States has enacted multiple federal codes including bankruptcy, immigration codes, and tax codes. Although, each state has different codes in the United States most have adopted some version of Uniform Commercial Code (Stende-Berger, 2015). Also, the United States enacted codes for education, family, property, probate, and government. In comparison, the Mexican government uses a similar codification to address the specific topics as well. The
Injustice in 18th Century Mexico In the inconclusive court case on the “Scandal at the Church” of 1872 New Spain (Mexico), José de Alfaro fights in court to save his wife, Josefa Cadena, his unborn child, and his family’s honour by taking her attacker doña Theresa Bravo, her daughter, her sister, her woman deposited (her ward) and her husband to trial for their wrong doings. It was after mass at church that Mrs. Cadena brushed up against Mrs. Bravo; resulting in a violent outburst from the high class lady and her family. The six month pregnant Mrs. Cadena was brutally beaten. With the possibility of losing both his wife and child due to bleeding, Mr. de Alfaro seeks justice from those who harmed his family.
Mexico’s Attorney General’s Office (Procuraduria General de la Republica, PGR) had issued information related to the conformation of the seven principal drug cartels present at Mexico:
The United States has no more important foreign relation ship than that of which it enjoys with Mexico, and vice versa. These two countries share interwoven societies and economies. Although there have been disagreements and turbulence between the two countries, which partnership is without these? The Strength of each country’s democracy is fundamental to the other’s. This relationship that the two countries share directly affects that lives of millions of Mexican and United States citizens everyday. Recently these two countries have become even more unified than ever before. Tackling issues such as Border Control, Countering Narcotics, Dealing with multiple Law enforcement agencies, Human Rights laws, trade and development, etc. There are many issues that they are mutually interested in and must deal with. Yet, there are some vast differences in which these two countries are run. There are also many similarities, which we must take into account. Both Democratic Governments have similar structures, containing a legislative, judicial, and executive branch. Yet, these structures are very different internally, containing specific duties that the other country’s branch may not have.
Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever.
The scholarly authority of the authors make this journal an interesting read on this topic. The authors are able to present the issues with an ease and understanding that every undergraduate student or layman will easily grasp. Considering that this is a legal topic with many laws reviews to the authors did a good job. By bringing in the legal framework of more than 2000 laws and enactments that have been established by the state and federal governments of the US, the authors make it
On August 16, 1984 an international conference regarding population was held in Mexico City. It was at this conference that the Reagan Administration implemented the “Mexico City Policy”, also known and the Global Gag Rule. This policy stated that Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) would be prohibited from receiving United States funds if they performed, promoted, referred or counseled patients on abortion. The funds would be withheld from the NGOs even if the money used for abortion services were non-U.S. funds. This policy was in effect from 1984-1993 when president Bill Clinton came into office. On January 22, 2001 president George Bush reinstated the Mexico City Policy. There has been much debate over whether the policy is helping or hurting those abroad. Many people in the United States are not aware that the Mexico City Policy is in effect, or even what it is. It is very important that people here are aware of how the government is controlling health care and women’s rights in other countries.
The Influence of the Mexican Cartels in the United States Visiting a tourist attraction in Mexico, tourists do not realize the gruesome reality that Mexican civilians face on an everyday basis. Dead bodies cover the streets, the echo of gun shots ring through the streets daily, and seeing the cartels terrorize businesses. The rise of Mexico’s violence in the past decade has marked the country and made its way to the United States. The United States has ignored the problem for many years, since they always referenced Mexico’s drug crisis as a non-emergent issue. In the past decade the U.S. government has seen an increase in violence and consumption of illegal drugs due to the Mexican cartels.
California’s Constitution. The American citizens all abide by the United States Constitution. However, every state has their own constitution where details not stated in the United States Constitution may be voted upon and applied to their own state. In this paper, I will compare some of the details of governmental powers and individual rights in the California constitution with the United States constitution and the Arizona constitution. California’s constitution delegates that its government divides its power into three separate branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial.
When we hear discussions or read articles about drug wars, killings, and illegal immigration into the United States, many of us immediately think of Mexico. As a nation, Mexico is a much greater country than these commonly referred to issues. Mexico is a country with a broad history, deep family culture, and an economy fueled by oil and tourism. The United States Department of State (USDS) offers a broad range of information on countries outside the US, including Mexico. I found a wealth of information about Mexico through the USDS Background Note provided on their website located at www.state.gov. I will outline for you the key information found in this report, and others, related to the Mexican economy, culture, and more.
Constitutional law – body of law that includes guidelines and rules used to ensure the correct meaning of the constitution. This law also governs the actions set by the United States Constitution. (Wikipedia, 2014)
A revolution occurs when a need for drastic change is necessary to alter ones way of living. The change they are fighting for would end up to be a positive impact once victory prevails, but of course with every battle there are disagreements and violent quarrels. Revolution may seem to be a negative connotation, but there are always two sides to every story. Just like many other countries around the world a Latin American country called Mexico went through a revolution of their own. Although the Mexican Revolution was mainly fought for the distribution of land, it opened a gateway for the women. One of their main issues during the Mexican revolution dealt with women and their struggled determination for equality. Having many roles in society with restrictions placed upon them, an urge for mobilization, and a wonderfully strong woman role model named Hermila Galindo, it gave them all a reason for the extra push they needed for the change they wanted for the future. Being able to finally put their voice in action the women of Mexico fought proudly for what they believed was right.
The study also took a close look at how the courts deal with the issue, the administrative interpretation of the law, and the application of the reform to be very critical and increasingly impossible. The author discovered that immigration reform has chronic problems, citizens’ disinterest to participate in the political process, government inefficacy, and centralized decision making away from the very communities imparted. The lack of enforcement is mounting pressure on states’ budgets (appropriation and allocations) of resources as the number of beneficiaries for social services increased. On the other hand, Dorsey and Diaz-Barriza (2007) studied President Barack Obama stands on immigration when he was then senator and compared them to conservative and liberal position. In the research, the author lamented that then senator Obama called for a comprehensive immigration reform that would deal with the issues of border security, employers sanction for hiring illegal individuals and a path to earned citizenship. Both sides agreed in part, but disagreed with the issue of path to citizenship which created gray lack. Today, the debate continues between the both political parties and the states leading the president executive action on immigration in recent
According to Stoner and McFaul when the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) was defeated and voted out of office in 2000 this turnout allowed for a completion of a successful transition to democracy in Mexico (264). Although a transition did occur and Mexico does have solid democratic foundations, bewildering corruption, poor rule of law, and narco related violence have halted Mexican democratic consolidation.
Substantive and Procedural Law – Substantive laws are the social rights and duties of people, and procedural law are guidelines through which government bodies or courts deal with breaches in substantive law. E.g. substantive law would state that hitting someone with a car and driving off is a crime, while procedural law would define how the courts could try and sentence in the case.
In an article by Randal C. Archibold NY Times: New Leader Taps Mexican Discontent to Press Agenda of Change he expressed the “few topics” that get Mexicans worked up which is one their country’s cell phone service, limited programming on television and flagging school. According to Archibold Mexico’s president Enrique Nieto has said that he has been making “attention-getting” moves that he promises will “ transform Mexico” and “accelerate growth in an economy that has expanded too slowly to lift the country out of the developing world”. Apparently some Mexicans rank the economy as a greater issue than crime which suffices to Nieto’s agenda to improve the economy and education first because as a result it will decrease the