Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American expansionism in late 19th century
American expansionism in late 19th century
American expansionism in late 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American expansionism in late 19th century
Tyler Tenney
4/27/15
English 5th
Social Studies 4th
US was justified Mexico was stupid to shed American blood on Americas land. In 1846 there was a war that came upon the US and it was called the Mexican war. This war took place in Texas. Before this occurred the US wasn't being nice and fair to Mexico. The US was also breaking some laws. Was it right for the US to go to war Mexico? This war was also controversial. The US was justified in going to war with Mexico because Mexico fired first , it was Mexicos fault and the US has Texas now, and because of the manifest destiny. One reason the mexican war was justified was because Mexico started the war. In the guided essay paragraph eight it states, Mexican soldiers had fired upon America. It also states that President Polk had reason for going to war. Mexico also shed americans blood on americas land and that was a another reason why they could go to war. This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war because they lost people when mexico was stupid and fired on the US. We had a reason for going to war with Mexico because they killed our people. The US will always go to war with anyone who attacks us first. We will also go to war if they just cross the boundaries and start killing people.
…show more content…
In doc A paragraph 1 it states Texas is now ours. In doc A paragraph 1 it states let their reception into the family be frank, kindly, and cheerful. In doc B it states Texas had determined to annex herself to our union. This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because if Mexico did not fire and kill some of the US then they wouldn't have died. US also had Texas so they had more of an advantage. Instead of Mexico “exploding” they should have just not done anything and forget about it. With Texas we can do a lot more damage to
was not justified to declare war with Mexico because of the ignorance of Mexican authority, the robbery of disputed/Mexican-owned land, and the order from Polk which provoked the war. The U.S. were allowed by Mexican government to settle into the provenance of Texas. After settling in the nutritious and fertile farmland, the U.S. settlers rebelled against Mexican law and established slavery in Texas. The U.S. robbed disputed/Mexican-owned land, which led to confusion spreading into Mexico and the U.S. because of unofficial borders. Polk provoked a Mexican attack by ordering soldiers onto Mexican borders, which led to the Mexicans attacking out of pressure.
Later they wanted to annex it but Mexico said that any attempts to annex Texas would be an act of war. The Mexican War started in 1846, when Mexicans attacked a group of United States soldiers, under the command of Zachary Taylor, in a disputed zone on the border of United States and Mexico, killing about a dozen American soldiers. President Polk told the U.S. Congress that the “cup of forbearance has been exhausted” which means the Mexicans hit the last straw and it is time for war. President Polk sent General Zachary Taylor to Nueces River vs. Rio Grande to poke the Mexicans to shoot and they did. The Mexicans have shed “American blood upon American soil.” The United States wanted war with Mexico now they have a reason to declare war ( History.com
Still the United States was still justified in going to war with Mexico. Mexico thought that they were at Texas first and that, that meant that they had the right to call the land theirs but Americans counteracted that they were positive that Texas was theirs and God even tells them that it is destiny to have Texas so why doesn’t Mexico just go right ahead and give Texas to them so they wouldn’t have to lose so many lives. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because if they wanted the land they would have to go into strife to prove that the land was
A third reason the Mexican War was justified was Americans supported going to war. Evidence of this claim is in Document D where Charles Sumner said, at the time, citizens had already started to move to Texas from Massachusetts. Also, in Document B, the note following the letter says that Congress, over killingly, voted 214 votes for “yes” and 16 votes for “no”. This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because it shows support from American citizens and the American
Sixteen are killed from the Mexican attack along the Rio Grande! In 1821, Mexico freed itself from Spain. Mexico was equal in size to the United States. Mexican government wanted to increase population, so they invited Americans to settle in Texas. These settlers did not want to abide by Mexico’s rules and laws. Texas then won independence from Mexico in 1836. In the year 1844, James K. Polk was elected as president. He was a strong believer in manifest destiny. Congress decided to annex Texas into the United States. Mexico felt that America stole Texas from them. This caused conflict between the two countries. Was it right for the United States to declare war against Mexico? America was justified in going to war with Mexico because they could
Through Manifest Destiny, the U.S. conquered many new territories. Ever since the U.S. became its own country, they always wanted more land. They thought that the Manifest Destiny gave them the right to expand and conquer more land. The United States were offered a deal known as the Louisiana Purchase which doubled their size. Even after they received this land, they were thirsty for more. They wanted to have Texas as their own. After Texas got their independence from Mexico, President Polk annexed it. Polk had his eye set on California next. But before he could get California, he had to deal with border dispute in Texas, leading to the war with Mexico. So, did the United States have a good reason to go to war with Mexico? The answer is simple, the U.S. was not justified into going to war with Mexico. This is proven through the Manifest Destiny, border disputes, and an American viewpoint on the war.
The United States was unjustified to go to war with Mexico because the U.S provokes the war and starts the war, the only reason they had the Mexican war was to gain land and lastly Texas was stolen from Mexico by southern slave owners. The U.S. definitely had an advantage, they were stronger and better. So they could easily go to war with Mexico and
the land and yet it had such a weak economy and could use the money
War is inevitable, but the Mexican-American War could have been avoided when determining borders. The controversial Mexican-American war is often talked and argued about. The big question about the war that everyone argues about is, Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Well, were they? The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Americans invaded Mexican land, The United States already has lots of land, and the Americans ignored Mexican laws and regulations. In 1821, Mexico declares independence from Spain. Texas won its independence from Mexico in 1836 to join America. This War (1846-1848) marked the first U.S. armed conflict chiefly fought on foreign soil.
“largely ignored Mexican authority”(roden,317). The Texans(Mexicans) let in the Americans in without having to pay for land and they still broke the laws.“ Certainly (Mexico)... might just charge be citizen”(summers,329).The Anglos came in and disobeyed the only laws they had to follow. They made slavery illegal, then the anglos brought 38000 slaves(summers, 329). They knew slavery was illegal, but they brought them anyway. Texas welcomed them in if the Americans followed the laws(alamo, Background). They broke most of the laws. This evidence shows the U.S. was not justified in going to war because they disrespected the authority of Mexico. America was allowed to settle in Texas and they ignored everything they
United States started the war with Mexico due to its imperial ambitions and need for territorial expansion. America was modernizing itself and getting ready to engage in competition with Europe. Capitalism and modernization fueled the competition for resources to feed the industries, and the markets to sell the manufactured goods. A country in this world was either an exploiter or the exploited by that order of things. Being neither one of those was the hardest to achieve. Americans decided to be exploiters; therefore, they needed to engage in competition with Europe, a group of empires dominating the world. To successfully compete with Europe, America needed the natural resources and advantage over trading routes Asia to engage profitable in business with Asian territories. Another reason Americans engaged in war with Mexico was to avoid domestic instability and chaos that would slow down its imperial progress. Issues of economic crisis and slavery were vital to solve. The U.S needed to justify their actions; thus, they put the blame on Mexico for starting the war. The War with Mexico was a significant event since it was the largest U.S military expansion for the reasons of modernization covered up as an act of self-defense.
Beginning in 1845 and ending in 1850 a series of events took place that would come to be known as the Mexican war and the Texas Revolution. This paper will give an overview on not only the events that occurred (battles, treaties, negotiations, ect.) But also the politics and reasoning behind it all. This was a war that involved America and Mexico fighting over Texas. That was the base for the entire ordeal. This series of events contained some of the most dramatic war strategy that has ever been implemented.
mobilization as an attack toward Mexico. According to Jesus Velasco-Marquez from a Mexican Viewpoint, he states that “In the eyes of the Mexican government the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico...As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border,....an order which led to the battles of palo Alto and Reseca de la Palma.” Another thing he stated was that “ From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the US was inadmissible for legal and security reasons.” This evidence shows the US was not justified in going to war with Mexico because the US army was advancing on Mexican land which in Mexico’s eyes was a front on attack and they also saw saw the annexation of Texas not valid because even after Texas had won its independence, Mexico still saw it as a part of its
Texas and California already had American influences which is a reason why America was justified in going to war with Mexico. Texas was about as American influenced as California with schools, courts, and mills (Document A). Texas was already alike United States so it was basically already apart of the country. Texas had slavery and was mostly protestant which is another reason why Mexico might have wanted it to be theirs but was not already (Document
When Mexico abolished states rights and centralized power in Mexico City in 1835, Texans responded through violence and cries for independence. Led by Sam Houston, the Texas rebel army started a rebellion against Mexican rule, leading Mexican general Santa Anna to declare war on what he saw as traitors committing treason. Santa Anna’s approach against these traitors was brutal, executing 340 Mexican unarmed prisoners at the battle of the Alamo, giving the Americans even more motivation with saying like “Remember the Alamo”. Ultimately in April 21, Houston was able to declare victory after killing 600 Mexicans caught off guard, leading to the birth of an independent republic of Texas. This victory was key, as with control over Texas, control over California and New Mexico was surely to come. Therefore keeping in mind the violent and unjustified manor in which the US took the land of those who graciously offered it to them, we can immediately see how the United States are the aggressors in the conflict to