Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ap us history mexican war
Essay on mexican american war
The Mexican war of independence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Evaluating the Mexican-American War
The relationship between the United States and Mexico has made a remarkable impact on society throughout our history. Did you know that the Mexican-American War cost more than $75 million dollars in 1848 (Miller, 2006)? One question that gets brought up when talking about the Mexican-American War is if the war was just or an unjust war? Regardless if the war was just or not, the war between the two countries has greatly impacted the regions of land and the close ties we still have with Mexico today.
Morality will to be debated any time a country decides to go to war. During Polk’s presidency, many Americans debated intensely about going to war with Mexico. There are Americans who debated the war’s morality and there are Americans who supported it. (Pletcher, 2006). One of the reasons why Polk supported the idea of going to war was due to Mexico invading Texas and killing Americans on our own grounds
…show more content…
(Pletcher, 2006). Polk was also looking to expand the territory of the United States. The war between the United States and Mexico formed the area of land claimed by the two countries. The United States would gain a vast area of land such as present-day Texas and a border line extending past New Mexico, Arizona, and ending in southern California (Weber, 2006). Polk was looking to expand the territory of the United States. During the time period of the war, the United States was looking to expand their territory. One reason was because of the advancement of transportation and communicating with people across geographic regions (Johannsen, 2016). People became fascinated with traveling and one reason for that was the gold rush in California. The railroad system played an important role with transporting people from one side of the coast to another. Without this war, the entire landscape of the United States would be different. We may have never even discovered the concept of transportation people from one side of the country to another. The discovery of gold and silver in California and other western states helped contribute to the United States economy and the movement of people migrating west (Miller, 2006). The subject of Morality concerning the Mexican-American War is one of the most debated topics when reviewing the past and determining whether the war was just or unjust. The reason why people saw the war as unjust is because of violence such as the land taken away from the people who were originally from that area and families being split apart (Castaneda, 2006). Another reason why many saw the war as unjust is because of racism, slavery, and access to land with more cotton, which would result in more slave labor (Castaneda, 2006). The Mexican-American War was immorally violent. It was about making profit off slavery and proclaiming ownership to rich lands such as California and gold (Castaneda, 2006). Many innocent people in Mexico were killed and didn’t have a superior army like the United States. The Mexican army did not have a large officer corps and majority of their troops are from the poorest parts of society (Krauze, 2013). The United States’ artillery and gunfire caused widespread destruction to buildings, roads and ports (Miller, 2006). This was seen as unjust to many people. From the beginning of time, there has always been a sense of immorality. Immorality is still one of the major factors in any debate taken place today and will continue to shape the future. The United States and Mexico have been closely associated with one another throughout history.
The war between the United States and Mexico provides a deeper understanding of the conflicts the two countries face today. Was the Mexican-American War a just or unjust war? Yes, the Mexican-American War was unjust because the war was not seen as being moral or fair. The war was unjust to the people who had their homes and families destroyed. It was unjust making a profit off slave labor while conquering the land of people who were originally there. Although immorality ultimately shaped many people’s views on the war, there are also positive events that came from the war. We advanced the concept transportation and discovered new parts of the world that were never seen before. We learned how to communicate with people all across the country and eventually these territories would see a major impact in population and boosting the economy of the government. Just or unjust, there was a great deal learned from the Mexican-American
War. References Castañeda, A. I. (2006, March 14). A War of Violence and Violations: The Consequences of Conquest. Retrieved March 08, 2017, from http://www.pbs.org/kera/usmexicanwar/aftermath/violence.html Johannsen, R. W. (2006, March 14). Vast New Territories. Retrieved March 08, 2017,http://www.pbs.org/kera/usmexicanwar/aftermath/vast_new_territories.html Krauze, E. (2013). Border Battle: The Ugly Legacy of the Mexican-American War: Review Essay. Foreign Affairs, 92(6), 155-161. Miller, R. R. (2006, March 14). The War Between the United States and Mexico. Retrieved March 08, 2017, from http://www.pbs.org/kera/usmexicanwar/aftermath/war.html Pletcher, D. M. (2006, March 14). A Hypothetical Question: Was the U.S.-Mexican War Necessary? Retrieved March 08, 2017, from http://www.pbs.org/kera/usmexicanwar/aftermath/was_the_war_necessary.htm Weber, D. J. (2006, March 14). Many Truths Constitute the Past: The Legacy of the U.S.-Mexican War. Retrieved March 08, 2017, from http://www.pbs.org/kera/usmexicanwar/aftermath/many_truths.html
This book by Otis A. Singletary deals with different aspects of the Mexican war. It is a compelling description and concise history of the first successful offensive war in United States military history. The work examines two countries that were unprepared for war. The political intrigues and quarrels in appointing the military commanders, as well as the military operations of the war, are presented and analyzed in detail. The author also analyzes the role that the Mexican War played in bringing on the U.S. Civil War.
...conflict. The war had a profound effect on the United States domestic life. The government had massive spending. The more than $150 billion spent throughout this war led to a severe economic crisis (Lawrence, 171.) The war also caused Americans to not trust their governmental leaders for the first time in history. This was due to the Watergate scandal along with the war efforts (Lawrence, 172.) Due to the profound effects economically and socially the war had on Americans, the U.S. should have not proceeded to entering into a battle that was not their own.
In February 2, 1848, the final armistice treaty Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, through which the United States government got the access to entire area of California, Nevada, Utah plus some territory in Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico and Wyoming. As a compensation, the United States government paid 18.25 million dollars to Mexico.( Pecquet, Gary M., and C. F. Thies. 2010) However, apart from the death of people, Mexico lost half of its territory in this war, which initiate Mexican’s hostile towards American. In addition, after the Mexican-American war, there was an absence of national sense in Mexican, which had a negative effect on the unity and development of the country.
Robert E. Lee once said, “What a cruel thing war is... to fill our hearts with hatred instead of love for our neighbors.” The Mexican war is about to start and Robert E. Lee will play a big part in it. Before and during the Mexican war, Lee will serve under General Winfield Scott, and Scott will have great influence on him (History.com “American Civil”). America had an idea of “Manifest Destiny which was American who believed it was their destiny to spread their culture across the continent to the Pacific. During the Mexican War, Lee proved to be a combat leader, leading to his involvement in the Civil War for the Confederate States of America (Robert Rudolph).
The war between Mexico and the United States started in 1846, should the United States go to war with Mexico? The United States was indeed justified in going to war with Mexico, because 16 Americans lost their lives in a battle with Mexico. Second, Mexicans were mad about the revolution, and Mexico treated U.S. diplomats poorly. Many mini-huge and impactful battles took place to unite the country and to fulfill God’s will to take all the land. While trying to execute Manifest Destiny, 16 Americans killed for the right but made a sacrifice to take dominance over Mexico.
One reason the Mexican War was justified was the United States Manifest Destiny beliefs. Evidence supporting this reason is that, according to Document A, John O'Sullivan said it was God’s choice if the United States will grow by taking or buying territory. Also, the annexation of Texas helped grow the United States which gave the
Sixteen are killed from the Mexican attack along the Rio Grande! In 1821, Mexico freed itself from Spain. Mexico was equal in size to the United States. Mexican government wanted to increase population, so they invited Americans to settle in Texas. These settlers did not want to abide by Mexico’s rules and laws. Texas then won independence from Mexico in 1836. In the year 1844, James K. Polk was elected as president. He was a strong believer in manifest destiny. Congress decided to annex Texas into the United States. Mexico felt that America stole Texas from them. This caused conflict between the two countries. Was it right for the United States to declare war against Mexico? America was justified in going to war with Mexico because they could
The United States was unjustified to go to war with Mexico because the U.S provokes the war and starts the war, the only reason they had the Mexican war was to gain land and lastly Texas was stolen from Mexico by southern slave owners. The U.S. definitely had an advantage, they were stronger and better. So they could easily go to war with Mexico and
the land and yet it had such a weak economy and could use the money
The United States has no more important foreign relation ship than that of which it enjoys with Mexico, and vice versa. These two countries share interwoven societies and economies. Although there have been disagreements and turbulence between the two countries, which partnership is without these? The Strength of each country’s democracy is fundamental to the other’s. This relationship that the two countries share directly affects that lives of millions of Mexican and United States citizens everyday. Recently these two countries have become even more unified than ever before. Tackling issues such as Border Control, Countering Narcotics, Dealing with multiple Law enforcement agencies, Human Rights laws, trade and development, etc. There are many issues that they are mutually interested in and must deal with. Yet, there are some vast differences in which these two countries are run. There are also many similarities, which we must take into account. Both Democratic Governments have similar structures, containing a legislative, judicial, and executive branch. Yet, these structures are very different internally, containing specific duties that the other country’s branch may not have.
For centuries, Mexican Americans have dealt with an enormous amount of hardships that date back to their early Aztec roots. The source of many problems in Mexican American history can be traced in the pre-colonial period, before the United States of America was even conceived. Major problems of this era in history not only affected the Aztecs, but also the following generations of Aztec and Mexican descent, and continue to have an impact on their descendents in contemporary American society.
The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because America came in and broke the laws, there were no borders for Texas, and America stole Mexico's land. Tejanos(Mexicans) invited Americans in to settle in Texas. Americans also known as Anglos Broke most of the few laws Mexico made. There was a war for the independence of Texas. A couple years later, President Polk went to go ask Mexico for some of their land because of their belief called Manifest destiny.
Beginning in 1845 and ending in 1850 a series of events took place that would come to be known as the Mexican war and the Texas Revolution. This paper will give an overview on not only the events that occurred (battles, treaties, negotiations, ect.) But also the politics and reasoning behind it all. This was a war that involved America and Mexico fighting over Texas. That was the base for the entire ordeal. This series of events contained some of the most dramatic war strategy that has ever been implemented.
So, basically, it was the Americans invading Mexican territory, and the Mexicans were just defending themselves from the invading settlers. The Mexicans were also angered by the annexation of Texas, which used to be a part of Mexican territory. The outcome of this war was that, Americans made huge land gains and got tons of raw resources which paved the road to its future power and prosperity. America gained almost all of the land it has now, except for Alaska and Hawaii. The raw resources made industrialization easier and the land increased agriculture, it also increased slaves, because there were more plantations, which needed more slaves.
I believe the war was not justified for a number of reasons. The ratio of dead to wounded was higher than it was in the civil war which is considered one of the saddest wars in this country’s history. In the civil war, the ratio was one wounded to five killed, where as in the Philippine War, the ratio was one wounded to twelve killed. America instead of trying to peacefully resolve the situation, decided that force was a more potent way to talk and guarantee control of the newly gained possession. I would use war as a last result, trying diplomacy first. It was good that the United States was freeing a country from an immoral government, but there are better ways to solve the controversy of what to do with the new annexation.