Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime and social inequalities
Links between poverty and crime
Classic strain theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Saying “poverty breeds crime” is taking a broad approach to a problem without looking into the real causes of poverty or crime. Depending on the theory followed, it can be argued poor people have no drive or initiative to do well and as such breed generation after generation of stereotypical negative behavior. Whereas, if you believe society has created the problem of poverty by lack of economic solutions, i.e. education, access to jobs, higher minimum wages, then crime could be reduced by providing solutions. Considering crime, for instance white-collar crime, is not always poverty driven leads to yet another debate. So, if the theory of the culture of poverty is observed; crimes would be committed by those living in higher poverty areas. This theory maintains since the family dynamic is broken, (mostly women raising children with no male authority figure) there is a lower income base and as such live in poorer neighborhoods which lack the educational opportunities afforded to others living in higher income areas. This, in turn, leads to a higher drop-out rate, the exposure to negative incidents and the likelihood of crime as a way of innovation as described by Merton’s Strain Theory. White-collar crime then makes this theory …show more content…
Every person will have an exposure at some time in their life to someone positive and will have a chance to reflect this characteristic whether learned from a teacher, older family member or the neighborhood store owner. Stories of people overcoming obstacles of birth and circumstances abound in major sports, movie actors/actresses and musical artists.
Arguments proving or disproving “poverty breeds crime” can be considered flawed or having only a partial answer to a statement which is oversimplified and
“Poverty… and crime go together. That is the truth” (Green 16). Bonnie and Clyde were both born into poor families. They lived their lives during the Great Depression. “It was during the Great Depression that Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow went on their two-year crime spree (1932-1934)” (Rosenberg 1). Bonnie and Clyde were both desperate for money, and had no limits to which they would achieve it. Poverty was a cause of their criminal actions. “Poverty obviously doesn’t excuse crime, but it does just as obviously breed it” (Green 19). They were willing to rob banks, kill, and commit grand theft auto just to get money. They were desperate and needed to support their life, but were both unemployed.
One of the most important social factors that contribute to violent death in the United States is poverty/ unemployment. “Poverty can lead to high levels of stress that in turn may lead individuals to commit theft, robbery, or other violent acts” (Taylor, 2006, p.1). Poverty can lead to people with an inferior education meaning that they have less access to quality schools, role models, and jobs. So many people including children and teens are more likely to engage in bad behaviors and associate themselves with gangs due to poverty. Crimes and violent deaths are committed when so impoverished people have a way to obtain material goods. When they want to acquire more goods they will commit more violent acts. Unemployment increases poverty rates and will lead to people committing crimes due to being depressed from having no
These crime-ridden communities (or ghettos) are springing up all through the country, mainly in and around major metropolitan areas. These areas are the most populated, so that means that within these areas are the most people there to be influenced by the crimes committed by fellow people. In Male's reading he shows statistics that prove the fact that once the poverty factor is taken away then teen violence disappears. He later adds, “That if America wants to rid of juvenile violence than serious consideration needs to be given to the societally inflicted violence of raising three to 10 times more youth in poverty than other Western nations.” (Males p386)
Sociologists understand the concept deviance in a variety of ways. It is the result of unsuccessful socialization, the solutions is usually intended to change the mind of the individual, and that order need to remain maintained. Norms determine whether something is deviant or normal. So deviance depends on the social status and power on the person, the social context in which the behavior occurs, and the historical place it takes place in. Deviance is all about violating the day to day norms and is usually considered to be wrong bad, or immoral. It is a process because it just doesn’t happen one day it’s usually happens overtime. For example, its two type of deviants the primary deviance and the secondary deviance. Primary deviance would be
Crime in this country is an everyday thing. Some people believe that crime is unnecessary. That people do it out of ignorance and that it really can be prevented. Honestly, since we live in a country where there is poverty, people living in the streets, or with people barely getting by, there will always be crime. Whether the crime is robbing food, money, or even hurting the people you love, your family. You will soon read about how being a criminal starts or even stops, where it begins, with whom it begins with and why crime seems to be the only way out sometimes for the poor.
Crime has always been a hot topic in sociology. There are many different reasons for people to commit criminal acts. There is no way to pinpoint the source of crime. I am going to show the relationship between race and crime. More specifically, I will be discussing the higher chances of minorities being involved in the criminal justice system than the majority population, discrimination, racial profiling and the environment criminals live in.
Aristotle (350 B.C.E) quoted in Jowett (2009) states that: “Poverty is the parent of revolution and crime. Great Philosophers such as Aristotle helped to set the foundation of what we today define as ‘crime’ showing that even in 350 B.C.E the definitions of ‘crime’ came from what was fist defined as ‘poverty’.
Many people in the world today criticize and objectify specific people, merely by their outward appearance, as more likely to commit crime or other violent acts. A theory well known to criminologists is one devised by criminologists of the Chicago school, scholars whose main area of focus were urban, impoverished areas, and called their findings the Social Disorganization Theory in which it offers an idea as to why crime occurs in urban settings. The theory explains how American society is centered on the economy and individual achievement, otherwise known as “The American Dr...
Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory merged ideas from Merton’s Strain theory and the Robert Merton’s strain theory and the Chicago school on how criminal behavior is learned through cultural transmission (Lilly et al.2010). The Chicago school was based off Edwin Sutherland’s Differential Association theory and the research from the Chicago school played a immense role for these two theorists to understand criminal behavior and develop their own theory. Robert Merton’s Strain theory solely focuses on the American Dream and the failure to achieve economic success, in particular his research looked at the social structure barriers for the lower class (Bernburg 2002).
There are many studies that point out some risk factors that could be responsible for criminality, but it would not be appropriate to say that is specifically poverty or the current economy. This field of study is uncertain about affirming this kind of assumption. But all this discussion about Broken Windows Theory leads us to reflect why not try to prevent crime instead of act after the crime has been committed?
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
Crime and criminalization can be ambiguous; crime is only crime until certain authorities deem the actions illegal. However, social inequalities can lead to increased crime rates, notions such as gender, age, race, and class influence crime and provide criminologist with the date to determine who is most likely to commit a crime and where.
They would focus on low income areas because according to Cloward and Ohlin, those who do not have the same opportunities as others, are more than likely to commit crimes than those who have multiple opportunities. The scope of the differential opportunity and delinquency theory would be the fact that individuals that do not have the same opportunity as others tend to commit illegal crimes to achieve a certain goal, but more often than not, it is not enough. The easiest way to describe the parsimony of the differential opportunity theory is to understand the different types of criminal cultures that Cloward and Ohlin have developed. According to them, individuals commit crimes because they do not receive the same opportunities as others around them. The opportunities can be presented as an education, extensive or not, and job opportunities. Cloward and Ohlin determined that there are three different subcultures that explain criminal behavior in urban
Strain theories of criminal behaviour have been amongst the most important and influential in the field of criminology. Taking a societal approach, strain theories have sought to explain deficiencies in social structure that lead individuals to commit crime (Williams and McShane 2010). Strain theories operate under the premise that there is a societal consensus of values, beliefs, and goals with legitimate methods for achieving success. When individuals are denied access to legitimate methods for achieving success, the result is anomie or social strain. This often leads an individual to resort to deviant or criminal means to obtain the level of success that they are socialized to pursue. This is the basic premise of strain theory. This paper will explore the evolution of strain theories by first examining their intellectual foundations which laid the foundation for Robert Merton’s theories of anomie and strain. Merton’s strain theory will be discussed in detail including the modes of adaptation that people use when faced with societal strain. Finally, the paper will conclude with the strengths and weaknesses of Merton’s strain theory and an examination of the criminological theories and social policies it has influenced.
The majority of the South African people are unemployed or else the breadwinner of the family looses the job or dies. In that situation the family has nobody to provide them with the basic needs of life. The children have no money to go to school and that alone increases the rate of poverty as it is known to everybody that if u is uneducated, you have no good chances of getting a well paying job that will sustain you for the rest of your life. In those situations people turn to crime. They believe that it is the only way that will get food on their table, clothes on their back and roofs over their heads. They also believe that the poor must get their needs from the rich, in that way they target the rich people. The increase in the rate of poverty means the increase in the rate of crime.