Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structure and organization of the congress
Madisons ideads of federalism
James madison federalist 10 essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Structure and organization of the congress
Daniel Severinov 11/3/2014 01:790:395 D. Mayhew Mayhew provides an analysis of the structure, function and organization of the United States Congress, as well as the incentives that the Members of Congress find themselves motivated by. In Madison's Federalist Articles, the founding father lays down many facets and points that he would like to see incorporated by the government, as well as possible solutions to several problematic areas of interest, such as factions. Mayhew's analysis points out the Members of Congress' prioritization of re-election seeking behavior, with congress members finding themselves in a state of constant fear of losing an election and always seeking ways to improve their chances of winning an election, "interested …show more content…
in nothing else." (Mayhew, 13) Thus, the overall balance of Congress is maintained by a trifecta of goals that members find themselves engaging in: advertising, credit-claiming and position-taking – in my opinion - position-taking being the central role/point of the Congress Member in relation to the functions of government, and advertising and credit-claiming playing a role in the Members of Congress' need for re-election and showcasing the bureaucratization of modern government.
This results in a balance in which the functions of government are still considered despite the prioritization of a somewhat primal need of the Congress person to keep himself in office - motivated by money and power on the individual level, and adding the lust for money and power into the functions of the government: and not that Mayhew is praising this function of the …show more content…
government, this is something Madison was against. The central idea in Mayhew's Congress: The Electoral Connection revolves around the point that the structure and organization of the United States Congress may be explained as a result of the re-election seeking behavior of its participants (the Members of Congress). For Madison, the frequent elections to restrain the human nature of the “temptations of power” are a corner stone of democracy: “…where annual elections end, tyranny begins.” (Federalist 53, 74) However, he acknowledged that too frequent elections would not afford legislators with enough time to learn issues at hand.
Therefore, the period of service should “bear some proportion to the extent of practical knowledge requisite to the due performance of the service.” (Federalist 53, 77) He also foresaw that some outstanding legislators might be re-elected and would become “masters of public business” (Federalist 53, 72). As now-a-days the re-election rate for members of Congress exceeds 90%, it seems that Madison’s theory of democracy is in contradiction with the present situation where the political elite minority rules over people. And as Mayhew points that politicians are only motivated by the rewards of office (income, prestige, and power), thus they seek re-elections to hold on to these rewards rather than to promote ephemeral “good public policy.” (Mayhew, 16) But whatever stimulates the politician; frequent elections uphold the democratic principle of the accountability of politicians before the people. The quest for re-election makes a congressman to engage in activities related to re-election, such as advertising of his qualities as a politician to promote public policies, claiming credit for influencing certain legislature, and taking a position on current issues.
Even though all these activities stem from the politician’s self-interest, they assist the public with information on government legislative activities and help the public to assess their representatives’ position and performance. Thus, as Madison envisioned when “the interest of the man” is “connected with constitutional rights of the place” (Federalist 51, 60) and “the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights” (Federalist 51, 65) the democratic principle is maintained not as a difficult to achieve ideal, but as a working model of society where there is no angels amongst the men or the governments. Works Cited • Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Second ed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale UP, 2004. Print. • Rolfe, Genevieve. The Federalist Papers: A Modern Translation : Numbers 1, 10, 39, 51, 53, 70 and 78 in Parallel Text. Teacher ed. Yorba Linda, Calif.: DAC Educational Publications, 2000. Print.
(475 U.S. 469 [1986]), connects with the concept that Lynn proposes in the essay, Federalist No. 51: Is Liberty Guaranteed by Structures? Lynn suggests that the checks and balances system of the U.S. government has created a gridlock when keeping the government’s integrity (2011). Pemnaur can be used an as example to justify Lynn’s argument.
The excerpt “Congress: The Electoral Connection” written by David Mayhew centers around the fundamental arguments that discusses how members of congress are self-interested for reelection. Mayhew further elaborates on his idea by discussing the electoral activities that congress members devote their time into and resource from, which are advertising, credit-claiming, and position taking. Mayhew’s excerpt further examines the framework in how congress operates which contributes to the explanation of how and why congress partakes in the certain electoral activities.
Consistent to eighteenth-century ethos left the Constitution-makers with great faith in universals. They believed in an inexorable view of a self-interested man. Feeling that all me were naturally inclined to be bad they sought a compromising system of checks and balances for government. This was bolstered by the scientific work by Newton, ?in which metaphors sprang as naturally to mens minds as did biological metaphors in the Darwinian atmosphere of the late nineteenth century.? Therefore Madison and others thought to squelch the possibly dangerous majority by setting up a large number and variety of local interests, so that the people will ?be unable to concert and carry into effect their scheme of oppression.? And thus, chief powers went to the propertied.
What motivates members of Congress to act the way they do? Mayhew would argue in Congress: The Electoral Connection that members of Congress are ‘’single-minded re-election seekers’’ and that re-election is their one and only goal. Whilst the assumption that all members of Congress are ‘‘single-minded re-election seekers’’ does go some distance in analysing the motives behind members of Congress, the reading fails to take into account the other key goals of members of Congress. Other goals include good policy and future career positions. It is important to remember that the achievement of both re-election and other goals are not exclusive, members of Congress often are motivated by more than one goal.
Members of congress have three specific goals. The one that seems to be the most important
Madison speaks of the problems of the present attempts at a new government saying “our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and over-bearing majority”.
As seen quite often in the Obama administration, legislation gets stuck and lost in Congress due to the polarization of the parties in recent years. In Obama’s case, he has frequently threatened to go around the House and Senate if they could not reach an agreement or would shoot down his plans. Cato’s Pilon points out, however, that the hurdles of Congress are no mistake. Pilot states that the framer’s of the Constitution knew what they were doing, and this was intended to keep the checks and balances as well as accountability to the public (Lyons,
"Elections, especially of representatives and counselors, should be annual, there not being in the whole circle of the sciences a maxim more infallible than this, 'where annual elections end, there slavery begins.' These great men . . . should be [chosen] once a year — Like bubbles on the sea of matter bourn, they rise, they break, and to the sea return. This will teach them the great political virtues of humility, patience, and moderation, without which every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey." —John Adams
In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In “If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?” author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation.
While the government of the United States owes its existence to the contents and careful thought behind the Constitution, some attention must be given to the contributions of a series of essays called the Federalist Papers towards this same institution. Espousing the virtues of equal representation, these documents also promote the ideals of competent representation for the populace and were instrumental in addressing opposition to the ratification of the Constitution during the fledgling years of the United States. With further reflection, the Federalists, as these essays are called, may in turn owe their existence, in terms of their intellectual underpinnings, to the writings of the philosopher and teacher, Aristotle.
In conclusion, even though some of the Congress processes and its structure seem to be made to slow things down and to reduce effectiveness, they exist to, as discussed in class, protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. After all, one of the main objectives of having a government is to create a balanced society, and to reduce the chances of having social convulsion and anarchy.
2. Roche, John P. "The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action". American Politics. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston, MA. 1999. (Pages 8 -- 20).
Initially, the Founders intended to have a limit on the amount of time any one person could serve. In the Articles of Confederation, a rotation in office system was described, so that no one person could remain in a position for decades on end. However, this was abandoned in the Constitution because it was deemed unnecessary. At the time of the nation’s founding, the occupation of “politician” did not exist. One could hold an office for a number of years, but it was not considered a career path. Originally, politicians were seen as making great sacrifices, because they stepped away from their family and primary jobs for a number of years to serve their country, before returning to their normal lives (Vance, 1994, p. 429). In the words of Founding Father Roger Sherman, “The representatives ought to return home and mix with the people. By remaining at the seat of the government, they will acquire the habits of the place, which might differ from those...
In conclusion, Congressional representatives should be limited to serving two terms. Limiting the terms of career politicians will promote fresh ideas and reduce the possibility of decisions being made for self-interest. It is in our Country’s best interest that our legislator’s decisions are equitable and that compromises are not made to ensure their own or their parties stay in office.
...eparates congress into the House and Senate. This further provides internal checks on legislative branch. Likewise, in the political science lecture of the Introduction to Political Thought and Theory in the March, Professor Al Schendan explains these structures as the necessary for liberty.