Melactha Comparison

640 Words2 Pages

How do academic factual texts differ from texts of fiction in ways of style? To demonstration whether such differences can be deduces, the literary style of Samuel Johnson’s preface to his dictionary and Gertrude Stein’s story of ‘Melanctha’ will be compared. Carefully analysing the difference between the two works down to even word level will show if any similarities exist. The stylistic level will be the main focus of the analysis based on two passages chosen which can be found in the works cited list. Evidently, Johnson would desire to show off his dictionarial abilities since his preface to some extent serves not only as a selling point but also as proof of how a dictionary enriches the owner’s life and vocabulary. To come off as academically …show more content…

This is the exact opposite case with ‘Melanctha’ where the same words are repeated in what could almost sound trance-like, ‘Rose thought it would be nice and very good […] he was a good man […] and got good wages’ (my italics). In what seems an attempt to increase the mysteriousness of the undiversed text of Melanctha, sentences are some times more likely to be separated by a comma or simply an ‘and’ than by a full stop, creating run-on sentences. This lowers the stylistic level of the text since it appears unprepared and almost childish, which is only emphasised by the ommitance of synonyms. Of course, Johnson does not even once seem to make a single mistake, in a grammatical sense at least, and every sentence seems perfectly shaped to his design. Though his sentences might be long, they are supposed to be, which is reflected in the structure of his sentences. While Melanctha’s story is narrated with a use of endweight where the sentences nexus are placed at the very end, Johnson tends to do the opposite, which

Open Document