Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cases of medical negligence in law of torts
Cases of medical negligence in law of torts
Conclusin Of Medical Malpractice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cases of medical negligence in law of torts
For healthcare providers, there is no word that elicits as much frustration, fear and anger as much as the word “malpractice.” Medical malpractice is defined as any act or omission by a physician during treatment of a patient that deviates from accepted norms of practice in the medical community and causes an injury to the patient. Medical malpractice is a specific subset of tort law that deals with professional negligence. In order to prove that there was some type of negligence going on you must show that: 1. The plaintiff’s attorney must show that there was a breach of duty causing a lack of medical care that another healthcare professional would have used. 2. There must be an emotional, or physical injury caused by the medical professional. …show more content…
First introduced by GA Republican Sen. Brandon Beach, SB 141, The Patient Compensation System he proposes that this bill would result in a 15%-22% reduction in insurance premiums. So what exactly is SB 141, The Patient Compensation System? This bill would create an administrative compensation system similar to worker’s compensation for the payment of medical malpractice claims. Many senators believe this bill would be harmful to the healthcare consumers for Georgia’s healthcare system because this bill will prevent an injured patient from seeking damages in a court of law. An additional administrative compensation system would deny injured patients access to courts of law, interfere with the doctor-patient relationship, and attempt to fix a non-existent …show more content…
All malpractice cases must be brought through this new administration to even be considered for a case or monetary rewards. Instead of having their case heard by a jury of their peers in regular court of law regarding medical malpractice cases, injured patients would be at the mercy of people who were selected to be on a “panel”. Such a backwards system would not only deny both the patient and physician of their constitutional seventh amendment rights to a jury trial and to appeal, but its multilayered system would leave it open to corruption and sadly abuse. When you give a group of people small amount of power, power to decide if something is liable and worth monetary damages, they tend to abuse their power and hurt more people then they helped in the first place. Meanwhile, victims of non-medical Torts, such as battery and ordinary negligence, would still be able to pursue their claims in the court of law. A victim of a lawnmower accident who lost a foot would still have more rights than a patient who lost a whole leg due to a physician’s mistake. This is basically giving Georgia healthcare consumers the short end of the
Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….
There are defenses against negligence lawsuits for sports medicine professionals. The first of which is assumption of risk, where the athlete voluntarily and knowingly assumes the risk of an activity through an expressed or implied agreement. This can be done by having a form signed during pre-season paperwork. This does not forgive a clinician of reckless conduct, however. Assumption of risk is for the usual risks, and the athlete by singing assumes responsibility for injury that occurs as a result of the inherent dangers of sport. It is crucial that athletes be informed that risk for injury exists and understand the nature of that risk. Another defense is an act of God, which are events that are outside of human control. This includes natural disasters, weather, and other environmental concerns in which no one can be held responsible. If the incident was not foreseeable, this is another defense a clinician could use against a negligence lawsuit. Foreseeability is based upon whether the clinician at fault could have realistically anticipated the consequences that would result because of their conduct. In order for the clinician to be held liable, the harm must foreseeably arise from the negligent act. Good Samaritan laws provide limited security against legal liability should an accident arise while providing care during an emergency, in good faith, without expected compensation, and without misconduct or gross negligence. This usually does not apply to someone providing care during regular employment. It was created for situations in which a volunteer comes to the aid of an injured person during an emergency in order to reduce bystanders ' hesitation to assist because of the fear of a lawsuit. The individual providing care must ...
Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the country. Medical malpractice is defined as “improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional” (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to compensate victims for any negligence.
Our healthcare system has developed into a burden for most people and has terrible consequences for others. It consists of everyone paying for healthcare as a whole, instead of people paying for themselves. This system of healthcare has burdened the people who take care of themselves and have money, but extends the life of people who do not take care of themselves and live in poverty. This is not pleasant for the one’s who decided to go to school and make well over minimum wage. In turn, they are the individuals who end up paying for the people who decided to make bad decisions in their life that put them in the minimum wage position. Clearly, laws regulate the insurance companies but these regulations do not make any sense to many. Balko explains that, “More and m...
Medical malpractice is like a virus that spreads contagiously and has been going on for many years. This phenomenon has caused deaths, diseases, and injuries due to the negligence of medical professionals towards their patients. Hospitals are losing their reputation and doctors are losing lots of their money. Usually after the doctor does something wrong, the patient should file a lawsuit against them and the hospital. One way to prevent malpractice is to pick younger doctors who are more careful with what they are doing. Malpractice is an occurrence that should be stopped soon or many injuries could occur to the patient due to the doctor’s negligence.
Governing bodies for the prevention, treatment, and management of illnesses in America are now in a commotion because of the cost of care and patient access and the need for a more efficient system. There are approximately 50 or more million people currently in The United States that are without insurance today. In March of 2010 a country wide health care charge called The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was passed, that seemed to offer solutions to some of the major issues facing our health care system. June of 2012, this new health care law or tax was challenged in the U. S. Supreme Court on the Constitutionality of the bill with proponents wanted the Act repealed. A few weeks later the Supreme Court gave its answer, which was the law or tax is Constitutional and upheld it as tax. One of the biggest issues to this Act was the part where all Americans have to be insured by someone or be penalized, but the final analysis of this...
In the case of Tomcik v. Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation & Correction, the main issue present was the medical negligence demonstrated by the staff of the medical clinic at the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction towards the inmate Tomcik. Specifically, nonfeasance, or the “failure to act, when there is a duty to act as a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances” (Pozgar, 2016, p. 192), was displayed when the employees at the medical clinic failed to give immediate medical attention to Tomcik when she continually signed the clinic list and “provided the reason she was requesting
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed by President Barack Obama is a significant change of the American healthcare system since insurance plans programs like Medicare and Medicaid (“Introduction to”). As a result, “It is also one of the most hotly contested, publicly maligned, and politically divisive pieces of legislation the country has ever seen” (“Introduction to”). The Affordable Care Act should be changed because it grants the government too much control over the citizen’s healthcare or the lack of individual freedom to choose affordable health insurance.
...r malpractice if a patient were given a surgery based on findings and it turned out they actually did not need the surgery.
Health care is “the prevention, treatment, and management of illness and the preservation of mental and physical well-being through the services offered by the medical and allied health professions” (Farlex Inc.). Health practices and services by health professionals must provide the best attention and safety measures when regarding patients. Patients go in with the thought that the medical staff will provide the best care possible and healthcare professional have a duty to do so. However, a major issue in the healthcare field for many years has been medical malpractice. The word malpractice derives from the Latin phrase "mala praxis" that was created by Sir William Blackstone during 1765 in his “Commentaries on the Laws of England” (Murphy). The first medical malpractice lawsuit in the United States happened in the year 1794, five years following George Washington inauguration (Murphy). Moreover, in the laws of ancient Rome and England, every person who entered into a learned profession assumed to bring to the exercise of a rational degree of care and skill. Nonetheless, there are often times when physicians deter from the rational degree of care and skill, causing malpractice. In the United States, medical malpractice suits first appeared during the 1800s. However, before the 1960s, legal accusations for medical malpractice were uncommon and had little impact. Since then medical malpractice claims have increased and are now very common, which is a major matter of question. Once the patient files a lawsuit, the defendant must deal with the legalities resulting from their deviation of duty. “A sum of 225,000 Americans die each year from all forms of medical malpractice put together and only 2% o...
“Medical malpractice occurs when a hospital, doctor, or other health care professional, through a negligent act or omission, causes an injury to a patient” (ABPLA). The problem with medical malpractice involves malpractice claims, unnecessary procedures, the general system, communication issues, and reform efforts. Although medical malpractice is a significant concern, much is being done to address this problem.
During a medical negligence case, the first phase is known as the written discovery phase of the litigation. It is during this phase that written documentation is requested, usually the initial set of interrogatories, and the request to produce documents including medical records and test slides or films taken. Risk managers must have a knowledge of the standard interrogatories and the types of required information in order to formulate an efficient, prompt and economical strategic discovery response.
Bodenheimer and Grumbach (2012) mentioned that forty seven percent of the health care financing is government financing in the year of 2009 (Martin, Lassman, Whittle, & Catlin, 2011). Lack of insurance, underinsurance, lack of access, and socioeconomic status are barriers to helath status outcomes (Bodenheimer and Grumbach, 2012). The challenges in reimbursing the providers are a multitude. One of the challenges that Bodenheimer and Grumbach (2012) points out is the optimal payment method is finding the balance between overtreatments and undertreatments (Casalino, 1992).
The USA needs to decrease this number because it is the third leading cause of
The idea of someone dying at the somehow unskilled hands of a trained professional is surprising. Human error has been a problem since the early stages of medicine. There is such a high amount of it now, though, it is killing many people. So many people have been killed, malpractice is now at a point where people have ranked it very high on the leading cause of death. Medical professionals should be put on trial for malpractice because they are paid too much for errors, mistakes cause emotional distress, and accidents may render a patient brainless.