Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Culture importance
The importance of a culture
Important Of Culture To The Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Culture importance
Chapter one
‘Social and political history of the gaze’
The ‘gaze’, as described in the Oxford English Dictionary:
Gaze [Verb] Look steadily and intently
especially in admiration, surprise, or
throught: ‘he could only gaze at her in
astonishment’ [Noun] A steady intent
look: ‘he turned, following her gaze’
‘offices screened from the public gaze’
During the last few centuries many prominent figures in their fields of study have examined the ‘gaze’. These include philosophers, sociologists, ’neurologists and psychoanalysis’s, under the headings; ‘The system of power and the gaze’ (philosophy), ‘The Male gaze’ and ‘The Imperial gaze’ (Sociology) and Scopophilia (’neurology, psychology and psychotherapy). The term ‘gaze’ was generalised by French
…show more content…
psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan whilst developing his theorem of ‘the mirror stage’-this theory looked at the subject and how they appeared to achieve a sense of mastery by looking upon one’s self as ideal ego. By using himself as the main subject and viewing his reflection within the mirror, the subject at the mirror stage begins their ingress into the language and culture which was established by his own self subjectivity due to the appearance within the mirror, an appearance and image that the subject is able to aspire to by portraying this image to others within and throughout their life (a version of one’s self that does not correspond to the chaotic drives of our actual physical selves). Lacan believed that once the subject entered the symbolic order, the subject would then develop narcissistic ideologies about themselves which is maintained by the imaginary order. As it is explained within the Lacan module on the structure of the psyche, the appearance of oneself can be officiated by those around them who may emulate within our lives such as; role models and lovers etc, which means that whomever we (as people) set up as a “mirror” for ourselves, is ultimately, a narcissistic relationship. According to Lacan: “The primary imaginary relation provides the fundamental framework for all possible erotism”. It is a condition to which the object of Eros as such must be submitted. “The object relation must always submit to the narcissistic framework and be inscribed in it” (Freud’s papers, 174). He also thought of the ‘Gaze’ as the tense feeling one develops when they become aware of being observed, such as the child who first viewed themselves in a mirror. Other theories he developed was how the gaze is used to display power or used in a disciplinary situations, as well as describing it as the real, the imaginary and the symbolic working together as one, thus creating the tension of our psychodynamic selves. To develop the understanding of the gaze further it is therefore important to put forward the observations from other academics from different disciplines to gain as true a reflection of its meaning as possible. The ‘System of power and the gaze’, is the influence the powerful and educated have over the underclasses and the ignorant.
‘The Birth of the clinic’ which was written in 1963 by French philosopher Michel Foucault, first referenced the term “medical gaze” to explain the process of a medical diagnosis. This is an interesting form of the gaze, as it also states a power dynamic that is created between the doctor and the patient, which reflects on the inquisition of medical knowledge within society. Foucault states his theory of the gaze by illustrating a dynamic within “power relations” and disciplinary in his work ‘Discipline and Punish – The birth of the prison’, written in 1975 which analyses the social and theoretical mechanisms stating the changes in the Western penal systems such as prisons and schools, which contain apparatuses of power within …show more content…
them. Foucault believes that the gaze is not something that someone has or uses; rather, the gaze is simply a relationship which one enters into. This is also a shared theory by Lisa Cartwright and Marita Sturken, both scholars, authors and critic’s, who co-wrote ‘Practices of Looking: An introduction to visual culture’; according to both, “The gaze is integral to systems of power and ideas about knowledge” (p94). The three main concepts that were introduced by Foucault were panopticism (modifing behavior), power/knowledge and biopower (Government bodies control over their population). Each of these concepts address the self-regulation which is found around the systems of surveillance, which refers to how people chose to behave under the belief and thought that they are permanently being watched; even if they cannot see who or what is doing the watching. The imperial gaze is the power of governments over not only its own people but also over other countries, notably weaker countries (in the past it was the major European countries over their colonies in Africa, India, Far East, etc. Nowadays, it’s the super power countries over the rest of the world, and to some degree we now have religious powers trying to exert their beliefs over others – although this is has been the case throughout the last few millennia). Post-colonial concept of the imperial gaze was introduced by E. Ann Kaplan a research professor of ‘English and Cultural Analysis’, and past president of the ‘society for cinema and media studies’, this concept focused on how the ‘observed’ found themselves defined within the terms of the of the ‘observers’ own set of values and privileges. The perception of the colonies meant that the imperial gaze belittles its citizens, by stating commands and orders to the masses enforcing them to abide by the rules set upon them. According to Kaplan “The Imperial gaze reflects the assumption that the white western subject is central much as the male gaze assumes the centrality of the male subject” this was quoted in Patricia Waugh’s ‘Literary Theory and Criticism’ in 2006 (p514). The term “post-colonial gaze” is used in order to explain the relationship of the colonial powers that were extended to the masses of colonised countries, similar to the Imperial gaze mentioned earlier. By placing the colonised countries in the position of the ‘other’ provided the ability to help shape and establish the colonial identity as being a powerful conqueror, and also acting and providing as a constant reminder of this idea. Professor Peter Beardsell Department of Hispanic Studies, University of Hull, stated ‘in Europe and Latin America: Returning the gaze’, “…has the function of establishing the subject/object relationship…it indicates at its point of emanation the location of the object” (p8). This means that the coloniser or the colonised relationship provided a basis for the coloniser to understand themselves along with their identity. This role provides the understanding of the appropriation of the power that is central to the understanding of how the coloniser has influenced the countries that they have chosen to colonise. Which brings about them being deeply connected to the development of the post-colonial theory, utilizing the post-colonial gaze theory by allowing the formerly colonised societies to conquer the social barriers which are often prohibited, meaning that the expression of their true culture, social, economic, and political rights, are no longer allowed within these countries. The ‘Male gaze’ is a term describing how men look and perceive the female body as a sexual object.
It was made popular by feminist and film theorist Laura Mulvey in 1975 in her essay ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’. Mulvey a Professor of film and media at the University of London introduced the ‘second wave feminist’ which is a concept that focused and studied the “Male gaze”. The concept features a gender power that is located within the film, media and the art world. Even though earlier studies of the gaze could be found within other academics works, Mulvey has been acknowledged for bringing this theory to the forefront of both academia and feminist movements. Mulvey believed that women were being objectified within and by the use of film due to the fact that the cameras were being controlled by ‘heterosexual men’, this meant that Hollywood films were playing at being voyeuristic. Later, this concept became an influential theory within feminist films and media studies as well as
art. Advertising and media agencies use the ‘Male gaze’ in their clients’ product advertisements, from male grooming products, to tourism; ‘The ravishing blonde in the arm of the great smelling handsome gentleman at the roulette table’, ‘the gorgeous babes playing volleyball on the beach in skimpy bikinis’. There are many more examples of these types of adverts that are primarily made by men for men. ‘Wear this aftershave and you too can have the beautiful lady’, ‘book this holiday and you can see and meet the shapely fun loving girls’. Advertising agencies in general have and are male dominate, this means that the representations that are brought forth are aim towards the white, western, heterosexual male. These therefore provide males with a privileged gaze over women the “master subject”. The predominant male behind the lens are the creators of the stereotypical ideal male fantasy that is the perfect female characteristics, such as; youth, beauty, sexuality, as well as the submissive and sensual female. These images projected onto the mass media are designed to sell products or services via the use of sexuality as a norm, that even young impressionable females believe this ideology as the way a female should look and act to be accepted by the male. Scopophilia which is someone who gains sexual pleasure from looking at pornography in multiple different formats such as photographs and film, as well as enjoying Voyeurism, this is also connected to the ‘gaze’. The term was introduced by Austrian neurologist, and the father of psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud (grandfather of artist Lucian Freud). Freud believed that the pleasure that is brought about by ‘looking ‘ is a natural instinct in childhood, ‘child with mother’ which in later years this benign instinct transfers into an interest of nudes in art for example, or alternatively becoming fixated into what Freud referenced it to be ‘…a burning and tormenting curiosity to see the female body’ (pp41-42) which led to Freud’s belief that the inhibition of scopophilia could possibly lead to disturbances of vision; meaning that one person could find themselves having inappropriate thoughts about someone else or others. The theory of scopophilia was further developed by Otto Fenichel the Austrian psychoanalysis in his works ‘The Scoptophilic Instinct and Idententification’ (1953). Fenichel believed that “…a child who is looking for libidinous purpose…wants to look at an object in order to ‘feel along with him’’ (p71). His work and research also led to the exploration into how looking could substitute for the act of those who appear anxious and want to avoid being seen as guilty. The afore mentioned Jacques Lacan who drew from the ideologies and theories of the eminent French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre’s states that the appreciation of the gaze and scopophilia are linked to each other: “the gaze is this object lost and suddenly re-found in the conflagration of shame, by the introduction of the other” ‘Lucan’ (p183). Lacan then went on to state how desire is simply captured and created within the imaginary appearance of the other, this theory has been analysed by other theorist in order to help emphasis and support the argument of how one discovers the sexual differences in childhood, and understanding or knowing one’s trigger to their scopophilic drive. With the introduction of camera’s in the 1970s people were able to indulge in film and cinema as a form of entertainment. Due to this cultural change within the social aspects, scopophilia then became a main theory amongst cinema psychoanalysts as a way to describe the pleasures and other unconscious processes which occurs within the viewer when watching film – which often left them being considered as being pathological. Other elements have arisen since the mainstream of cinematic viewing which occurred within social culture; these concept elements are known as ‘voyeurism’ and the ‘male gaze’ (which have been previously addressed at the beginning of this dissertation). Therefore, it can be stated that there are many forms of the gaze that has become the formation of the social structure that we use within our day to day lives. The structure of the gaze has been developed, changed and monopolized in many ways throughout the course of history, to ensure that citizens are kept in line for easy control purposes. These are only some examples that the way the gaze has been used throughout the years. I will next be critically analysing creative writing & art to see how the gaze and a power dynamic was used by each discipline; as a method of informing people of the way society perceives the female self-image and their placement within. I will also look at the voyeur & scopophilia aspect of these types of art forms.
The film Klute, directed by Alan J. Pakula attempts to subvert this theory, but ultimately proves Mulvey correct in the system of the active male and passive female, that the male controls the film and drives the story forward. Jane Fonda’s character, Bree Daniels, sees herself at the
Perhaps no other event in modern history has left us so perplexed and dumbfounded than the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany, an entire population was simply robbed of their existence. In “Our Secret,” Susan Griffin tries to explain what could possibly lead an individual to execute such inhumane acts to a large group of people. She delves into Heinrich Himmler’s life and investigates all the events leading up to him joining the Nazi party. In“Panopticism,” Michel Foucault argues that modern society has been shaped by disciplinary mechanisms deriving from the plague as well as Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, a structure with a tower in the middle meant for surveillance. Susan Griffin tries to explain what happened in Germany through Himmler’s childhood while Foucault better explains these events by describing how society as a whole operates.
Led by Laura Mulvey, feminist film critics have discussed the difficulty presented to female spectators by the controlling male gaze and narrative generally found in mainstream film, creating for female spectators a position that forces them into limited choices: "bisexual" identification with active male characters; identification with the passive, often victimized, female characters; or on occasion, identification with a "masculinized" active female character, who is generally punished for her unhealthy behavior. Before discussing recent improvements, it is important to note that a group of Classic Hollywood films regularly offered female spectators positive, female characters who were active in controlling narrative, gazing and desiring: the screwball comedy.
In 1996, the Wachowskis wrote and directed the noir crime thriller, Bound. In this film, the directors turned some of the archetypes of film noir on its head. Most notably, the role of women in film. Film theorist, Laura Mulvey, claims that the main role of women in film is to function as a source of pleasure, to be objectified, to be passive and at the command of male fantasy. This relationship of looking and being looked at causes each gender to have a particular presence within film; the male is active and the female is passive (Mulvey, 1975). However, in Bound, the character Violet, who is obviously objectified by the gaze of the male characters, does not hold a passive role within the film itself. Violet is a force that acts upon the narrative, manipulating events and scenes to her favor, along with actively controlling male gaze and using it to her advantage. Film theorist, Tania Modleski argues that there are passive and active roles within films that have connotations with “femininity” and “masculinity”, but these roles do not have to apply to the gender or outward appearance of characters that they align with. Modleski focuses more on the actions, not the outward appearances, of the film
Ever feel as though someone is watching you? You know that you are the only one in a room, but for some reason you get an eerie feeling that you are not alone? You might not see anyone, but the eyes of a stranger could be gazing down on you. In Foucault's "Panopticism," a new paradigm of discipline is introduced, surveillance. No one dares to break the law, or do anything erroneous for that matter, in fear that they are being watched. This idea of someone watching your every move compels you to obey. This is why the idea of Panopticism is such an efficient form of discipline. The Panopticon is the ideal example of Panopticism, which is a tool for surveillance that we are introduced to in “Panopticism.” Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," has taken the idea of surveillance one step further. The government not only observes everyone, but has complete control over society. The citizens of the United States cannot even think for themselves without being interrupted by the government. They are prisoners in their own minds and bodies. The ideals of “Panopticism” have been implemented to the fullest on society in Vonnegut’s "Harrison Bergeron," through physical and mental handicaps.
Westford, Massachusetts: The Murray Printing Company. Company, 1978 Kulik, Sheila F. Home Page. 17 Feb. 2000 http://www.feminist.com/femfilm.html. Rosenberg, Jan. “Feminism in Film.”
Scopophilia is taking other people as objects, subjecting them to a controlling and curious gaze by allowing the spectator to look into a secret diegetic world, a projection of desire onto the former. For example, Peeping Tom (1960) stimulates a direct connection with the audience between eye and phallus, through the form of a camera wielded by protagonist and serial killer Mark Lewis (Carl Boehm). He is equip...
The aesthetic approach, also known as the masterpiece approach, involves solely looking at movies as a whole. This approach coincides the movie to its own director. For example, the Auteur theory explains how the director is also the author of the film. Film as a social history approach includes issues such as, gender, racial, political, and environmental. For example, the feminist film theory conveys a negative approach toward women. As shown in movies, women are considered eye-candy, sexual, dumb, and have no authority. Laura Mulvey even coined the term that women are the “male gaze” of cinema. In result, the Bechdel Test was created; if a movie did not have at least two major female characters that interacted besides talking about men,
The concept of panopticon in the penal system, which showed immediate success in reform and discipline, eventually leads to it being linked to every component of the modern society. Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon and Foucault concept of Panopticism is seen in many places today in our society. Wherever you look you will certainly find places like, schools, hospital, factories, asylums, and even universities, represent Panopticism because all of this places have some kind of surveillance s...
In the article “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Laura Mulvey discusses the relationships amongst psychoanalysis (primarily Freudian theory), cinema (as she observed it in the mid 1970s), and the symbolism of the female body. Taking some of her statements and ideas slightly out of their context, it is interesting to compare her thoughts to the continuum of oral-print-image cultures.
The patriarchal cinematic ideology detailed by Laura Mulvey in “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” is pervasive in Stanley Kubrick’s film Eyes Wide Shut. The women in the film all eventually become the passive sexual objects that Mulvey has described in her paper. There are times in the film that women attempt to defy these strongly enforced gender roles, but they are always punished and returned to their positions as objects of the male gaze.
Over the past decades, media has constructed and manipulated women into being the main form of sexual pleasure for the male viewer. Pleasure in looking, scopophilia, is one of many possible types of pleasure that media presents. Scopophilia does not only present looking as a source of pleasure, but also the pleasure in being looked upon. Freud explains in his book, the three essays on the theory of sexuality (1905) that one of the main instincts of sexuality is scopophilia, and that scopophilia should be isolated as an independent source of pleasure because it does not depend on the erotogenic zones. Freud further demonstrates that “he associated scopophilia with taking other people as objects, subjecting them to a controlling and curious gaze” (Mulvey, 1975, p. 16.). As such, the theory of scopophilia does not only involve pleasure in being looked at and the pleasure in looking, but also the pleasure of looking at someone as an object. Freud ties scopophilia to the curiosity children show considering the human body and other people’s genitals. The media pleases the primitive lust of looking, while developing a narcissistic form of scopophilia in the audience (KILDE.
Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punishment The Birth of the Prison [online]. 2nd ed. USA: Penguin Books, Ltd. [Accessed 01 January 2014].
Feminism is a movement that supports women equality within society. In relation to film, feminism is what pushes the equal representation of females in mainstream films. Laura Mulvey is a feminist theorist that is famous for touching on this particular issue of how men and women are represented in movies. Through her studies, she discovered that many films were portraying men and women very differently from reality. She came up with a theory that best described why there is such as huge misrepresentation of the social status quos of male and female characters. She believed that mainstream film is used to maintain the status quo and prevent the realization of gender equality. This is why films are continuously following the old tradition that males are dominant and females are submissive. This is the ideology that is always present when we watch a movie. This is evident in the films from the past but also currently. It is as if the film industry is still catering to the male viewers of each generation in the same way. Laura Mulvey points out that women are constantly being seen as sexual objects, whether it is the outfits they wear or do not wear or the way they behave, or secondary characters with no symbolic cause. She states that, “in traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so that they can be said to connote it-be-looked-at-ness.”(Mulvey pg. 715). Thus, women are nevertheless displayed as nothing more than passive objects for the viewing pleasure of the audience. Mulvey also points out through her research that in every mainstream movie, there is ...
In her essay, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, British film maker Laura Mulvey attempts to demystify how pleasure can be fulfilled in film. Contending that a pleasure in looking (scopohilia) and a pleasure in possessing the female as what to be looked at (voyeurism) fufills the audience’s desires, Mulvey suggests how filmmakers use this knowledge to create film that panders to our innate desires. In “Meshes of the Afternoon” by Maya Deren and “Vertigo” by Alfred Hitchcock, it is seen that Mulvey’s argument—the desire to look, the hunting, seeking, and watching, and harnessing of the female form is natural human desire. Deren and Hitchcock will use entirely different techniques to achieve that sense of fulfillment for the audience. But how does this watching and looking translate in to the written word? In “The Winter’s Tale” by William Shakespeare, we will see the ideas approached by Mulvey and the themes used by Hitchcock and Deren utilized to create a sense of looking and objectifying the woman in the absence of the screen. Through this paper, the concepts of pleasure for Mulvey will be shown to have applicability not only in cinema but in art in far more universal terms. First, a discussion of pleasure and Mulvey’s definition of it will allow for clearer understanding as to what this fulfillment actually is. Secondly, Vertigo will be examined—as an example of “mainstream film” utilizing the ideas of scopophila and voyeurism in a perfect balance. Scottie and his search will then be contrasted with Leontes of Shakespeare’s Winter’s Tale, where again desires will be balanced in harmony with Mulvey’s principles. It is to become clear through...