Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral controversies in medical ethics on abortion
Abortion medical ethics
Abortion medical ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral controversies in medical ethics on abortion
In this medical ethical case study, there are two high-class parents with two normal children. Let’s call the family the Noble family. Mrs. Noble gave birth to a premature boy in the late fall of 1963. After the child was born, Mrs. Noble immediately and independently made a decision to not keep the child as soon as the diagnosed her newborn’s monogoloid (Down syndrome). Once the decision was final, the hospital did not attempt to override the decision or seek court order. Soon after, the child was separated into another room and was left for 11 days with no food. My purpose for gathering the information about Mr. and Mrs. Noble is to analyze her critical dilemma between keeping her child and having an abortion. Through the process of analyzing …show more content…
Noble did not show any love, justice or respect towards her newborn child. She did not love a baby that was born into the world because she was too busy focused on the baby’s condition and the best for her family, instead of the child itself. Justice was not shown in her final decision. The child did not deserve to be left alone and starve to death. The child had no choice or voice to influence the mother. The decision may be fair for the mother but not for the rest of the family and the people at the hospital. The children at home missed out on having another sibling; the nurses and doctors had to isolate an innocent child in a room to starve and wait for its death. Mrs. Noble was not respectful in choosing not to keep the child because of its diagnosis. There is a lack of love and justice between the mother and the newborn, as well as a lack of respect shown from the mother to the doctor and …show more content…
Noble did not directly kill the baby; however, she had the intention. For instance, if a mafia wanted to kill a specific person, he would not pull the trigger himself but send someone to kill that person. Mrs. Noble did exactly that, she allowed someone else do the killing by placing the child alone to starve. She wanted the baby to die but did not want to physically murder the child. She killed the child with her tongue. Proverbs 18:11 (ESV) states, “Death and life are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruits.” The tongue has the power to save and kill someone by what we choose to say in life, so Mrs. Noble chose to kill the baby with her words. Morally, Mrs. Noble actions were selfish and wrong for choosing to not let a child live because of its health and the way it was created. 1 Corinthians 12:12-14 (ESV) sates, “Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptized by[c] one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many.” Everyone is not built the same and made to do the same thing. Everyone is build for different reasons. The newborn maybe different and have some challenges, but at least the child will be a little more joyful than everyone else. Mrs. Noble
The case of 17-month old Emilio Gonzales was seen and heard nation wide. A conflict between the mother and the physician emerged after the physician no longer expected there be an improvement in his health. This led to the decision of discontinuing providing care for the child and requesting the parents find another facility willing to provide such medical care. The main issue of this case revolved around whether the physician’s decision was morally permissible or legally just. Under Kantian Ethics, Children’s Hospital has moral reasoning to terminate treatment for Emilio and thus is morally justified in withdrawing treatment.
In the Judith Jarvis Thomson’s paper, “A Defense of Abortion”, the author argues that even though the fetus has a right to life, there are morally permissible reasons to have an abortion. Of course there are impermissible reasons to have an abortion, but she points out her reasoning why an abortion would be morally permissible. She believes that a woman should have control of her body and what is inside of her body. A person and a fetus’ right to life have a strong role in whether an abortion would be okay. Thomson continuously uses the story of a violinist to get the reader to understand her point of view.
In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. In particular I will take a close look at her famous 'violinist' argument. Following will be objections to the argumentative story focused on the reasoning that one person's right to life outweighs another person's right to autonomy. Then appropriate responses to these objections. Concluding the paper I will argue that Thomson's 'violinist' argument supporting the idea of a mother's right to autonomy outweighing a fetus' right to life does not make abortion permissible.
and Mrs. Roth’s termination violates the moral rules do not kill, do not cause pain, and obey the law. Killing a child by giving them a drug is absolutely wrong. Even though the child is deformed this caused some pain from the time the Roth’s fed the child until she died. God gave us 10 commandments to show us how to live a better life and please God forever. One of those commandments are you shall not murder. Harms prevented in this situation would be long-term pain for the sake of the child. On the other hand, killing this baby would prevent the child from pain and suffering. However, it is strongly justified that this act is not permissible due to them being found guilty. The relationship between the mother and her child was not special. Mrs. Roth believed that the evil punishment prevented the child from pain and
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
Imagine…the birth of a human being into the world. 9 months of endless anticipation leading to someone’s first chance at seeing the world for the first time. While some enjoy the result of a pregnancy, leading to a new human being entering life, some are not so fond, or just can’t be in such a situation. Abortion is the supposed “cure” to this problem and is, for the most part, done safely. However, one of the factors stopping someone from committing an abortion is the consideration of moral status on the child.
The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”
In the United States, there is a three percent chance that a woman will bear a child with a birth defect. Mothers face difficult questions after conceiving a child with special needs. Jodi Picoult addresses the ethical decisions faced when trying to save a child with leukemia. However, this precarious situation is magnified when Sarah Fitzgerald chooses to procreate a child for skeptical reasons. Ultimately, it is immoral to conceive one child for the sole purpose of acting as an organ donor for another child; consequently, some parents take desperate acts to save their children.
I also believe that it important to point out the principle of justice in regard to this case. The principle of justice, which promotes equity and fairness among patients, is actually being dismissed (Veatch, Haddad, & English, 2010, 98). If the medical professionals do consider the mother and fetus to be two separate individuals, they must apply the principle...
Maternal-fetal issues spark complex and controversial debates in the field of biomedical ethics (Farber-Post, 1996). The conflicts arise when medical professionals try to determine to who their ethical obligations are owed to. Many ethicists argue that autonomy is precedential and therefore, it is the the duty of the medical staff is to the pregnant mother as it is her body and she has a right to make decisions regarding her healthcare. Others argue that other, but still just as important ethical principles such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, and avoidance of killing override the principle of autonomy and therefore these principles are owed to the fetus.
Should the right to life be taken away from an individual just because that person is unable to speak for him/herself? The unborn child is unable to speak for themselves. The number of abortion’s are continuing increasing throughout the world as time goes by. Abortion is the killing of a unborn baby. Abortion is a procedure where the fetus and the placenta is removed from the mother’s womb. It’s morally wrong to deny life to the fetus. There are 125,00 abortions preformed in the world everyday, that is 50 million a year. Everyone deserves to have rights. A fetus is developing into a baby human. It’s not ethically right to take away their life. All life is precious and needs to be protected. Should someone’s
The ethics of abortion is a very controversial subject. There are two sides to this topic, Pro-choice believers feel that a woman has the right to choose whether to have an abortion, while Pro-life followers feel that abortion should never be an option. However, the pro-life solution of abortion is to have the baby and raise it, or give it up for adoption. The pro-choice decision arrangement of premature birth is morally wrong and ought to be made illegal in light of the fact that there are physical outcomes for both mother and kid subsequently of a premature birth; fetus removal has turned
As the Santa Clara University states, “Ethics consists of the standards of behavior our society accepts.” By this means, some citizens can accept the fact that the child is suffering but many others cannot. There is not one agreement that can work it does not exist. In “Theory and Practice” by L M Bernhardt Mill uses a slogan, that is in the book of Jeremy Bentham’s, “The Greater Happiness for the Greater Number” to say, “utility is not satisfied by purely individual and selfish choices; maximizing one’s own pleasure at the expense of everyone else’s isn’t good at all. The happiness that utility is meant to promote is the general happiness of all, not the narrow pleasure of individual or small minority segment of a large population” (26). This Utilitarianism Theory is another concept that the reader can see, that can be used in the story. The happiness of many is not caused by the suffering of one
“Mommy, a month has gone past and I have started to notice how my body is forming, I know I am not much to look at now but just wait and see I’ll make you so proud! Even though I am feeling happy I sense something is wrong!....” “You seem to be having strange thoughts that leave me restless and worried, but I am sure everything is going to be ok! Don’t despair.” (Gregory, 2008-2015) I know that this quote is quite long, but if you read the quote it really touches home about how I feel about abortion and how some others may feel about abortion. I will be explaining the ethical dilemma, core beliefs, resolution, evaluation, comparison of abortion and my conclusion.
Abortion is an extremely controversial issue and one that is continually on the forefront of debates. Those who oppose the idea (Pro-lifers), thinks it is an act of woman playing “God” who live from who dies. Yet, whether an unborn baby constitutes a normal person is questionable; a pregnant woman, on the other hand, has the undeniable right to choose whether she wants to have a child or not. Therefore, the decision to have an abortion is the personal choice and responsibility of the woman, because prohibiting abortion impedes freedom of choice and endangers the physical and mental health of women.