Media 's Misrepresentation Of People With Disabilities

805 Words2 Pages

Approximately fourteen percent of the Canada’s population have a physical or cognitive disability, (Employment and Social Development Canada) yet ideologies of ableism (i.e. the oppression of disabled people) are continuously formed and perpetuated through mainstream media. A number of scholars have studied the link between media’s stereotypes of disabled people and the beliefs and practices of ableism; Stuart Hall focuses on the media as a “central part of ideological production,” (82) while Merril Harris and Chelsea Jones examine media’s misrepresentation of people with disabilities. The three scholars collectively agree that media is the main site through which oppressive ideologies are produced, reproduced, and transformed. Hall begins by defining ideologies as “images, concepts, and premises which provide the frameworks through which we represent, interpret, and understand … some aspect of social existence.” He explains that language is “the principal medium in which we find different ideological discourses elaborated.” (81). Jones identifies language as a “site of struggle” for disabled people, and links media labelling practices to “issues of identity” (102). Expanding upon Jones’ claim, Harris illustrates how our perceptions of disabled people (i.e. our ideologies surrounding disability) are “shaped and reinforced through our language patterns.” For example, terminology related to disability is commonly used to insult able-bodied people. Sayings like “get it yourself, you’re not a cripple” and “what’s the matter with you? Are you blind? It’s right over there” not only reinforce the stereotype that disabled people are helpless, but suggest that disabilities are something inherently “wrong” (Harris 9). Moreover, the person ... ... middle of paper ... ...ed by Canadian Hip Hop artist Drake, who does not have any physical disabilities. Jones criticizes these falsifications of disabled people’s experiences by explaining that when “media narratives … ignore, devalue, or misrepresent disability issues, they reflect the ableism of society” (103). With so many people experiencing life with physical and cognitive disabilities, it is disturbing that media’s representation of disability is so distorted. Media plays a central role in how people understand disabilities, and only through critical analysis can the “chain of meanings” that constitute ableist ideologies be “broken” (Hall 81). Hall, Harris, and Jones challenge readers to reflect upon the oppressive ideologies that may have previously seemed “normal,” however it can be argued that a true destruction of ableism must first come from the eradication of ableist language.

Open Document