Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence in movies
Does violent media cause violent behavior
How violence in movies affects society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Violence in movies
Does entertainment influence society's attitude towards violent behavior? In order to fully answer this question we must first understand what violence is. Violence is the use of one's powers to inflict mental or physical injury upon another; examples of this would be rape or murder. Violence in entertainment reaches the public by way of television, movies, plays, music, and novels. Through the course of this essay it will be proven that violence in entertainment is a major factor in the escalation of violence in society, once this is proven we will take all of the evidence that has been shown throughout this paper and come to a conclusion as to whether or not violence in entertainment is justified and whether or not it should be censored.
Television with its far reaching influence spreads across the globe. Its most important role is that of reporting the news and maintaining communication between people around the world. Television's most influential, yet most serious aspect is its shows for entertainment. Violent children's shows like Mighty Morphing Power Rangers and adult shows like NYPD Blue and Homicide almost always fail to show human beings being able to resolve their differences in a non-violent manner; instead they show a reckless attitude that promotes violent action first with reflection on the consequences later. Contemporary television creates a seemingly insatiable appetite for amusement of all kinds without regard for social or moral benefits (Schultze 41). Findings over the past twenty years by three Surgeon Generals, the Attorney General's Task Force on Family Violence, the American Medical Association, the National Institute of Mental Health, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and other medical authorities indicate that televised violence is harmful to all of us, but particularly to the mental health of children (Medved 70-71).
In 1989 the results of a five year study by the American Psychological Association indicated that the average child has witnessed 8,000 murders and 100,000 other acts of violence on television by the time he or she has completed sixth grade. In further studies it was determined that by the time that same child graduates from high school he or she will have spent 22,000 hours w...
... middle of paper ...
...p; If the government ever did censor violent entertainment who knows where they would stop, or even if they would. Perhaps they would try to censor violent speech or try to censor the speech of those who disagreed with the actions of the government. The simple message is don't promote censorship, because it could easily get out of hand, and as the old saying goes “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”. There are then only two ways to get rid of the violent entertainment in our lives: we could shame those who make the violent movies, television shows, books, and plays, into having a social conscience, making them be less prone to creating violent entertainment; or we could simply solve the problem ourselves, with a push of a button, or the turn of a page.
Work Cited
~ American Rifleman (1993). TV Violence: Does it Cause Real-Life Mayhem?
Lamson, Susan R, 19-23, 30-50, 100-109
~ Greenhaven Press, (1992). Youth Violence. Leone, Bruno, 32-48.
~ www.nccev.org/violence/statistics/statistics-media.html
~ www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-1.2/Media.html
~ www.health.org/govpubs/ms714.html
~ www.pbs.org/newshour/forum/ september99/media_violence.html
As I have read multiple articles about what bilingualism means I have come to understand that it’s more complex than just speaking two or more languages. The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides three definitions of bilingualism: (1) the ability to speak two languages, (2) the frequent use (as by a community) of two languages, and (3) the political or institutional recognition of two languages. Espada’s view of bilingualism seems more in line with the third definition and Rodriguez’s view identifies with the second one. I have developed my personal view as a mix of the second and third definitions. Although Merriam-Webster provides concrete definitions for bilingualism, people like Espada, Rodriguez, and myself have developed our own interpretation
Gina Marchetti, in her essay "Action-Adventure as Ideology," argues that action- adventure films implicitly convey complex cultural messages regarding American values and the "white American status quo." She continues to say that all action-adventure movies have the same basic structure, including plot, theme, characterization, and iconography. As ideology, this film genre tacitly expresses social norms, values, and morals of its time. Marchetti's essay, written in 1989, applies to films such as Raiders of the Lost Ark and Rambo: First Blood II. However, action-adventure films today seem to be straying farther away from her generalizations about structure, reflecting new and different cultural norms in America. This changing ideology is depicted best in Oliver Stone's Natural Born Killers (1994), which defies nearly every concept Marchetti proposes about action-adventure films; and it sets the stage for a whole new viewpoint of action in the '90's.
Women in Sparta had freedoms and rights like no other city-state throughout Greece. Spartan women would receive an education and physical training. They were fed properly and could eat whatever they wanted because the credit was given to women for making Spartan men strong due to them being able to have healthy babies since they were treated properly. Not only were Spartan women given a good education and were nourished properly, they were also given rights and freedoms which Athenian women would never have. Spartan women had the right to apply for citizenship at the age of eighteen while women in Athens would never be granted citizenship. Spartan women also had the freedom to wander throughout their city-state unlike women in Athens who were forced to remain inside. In Sparta, women had the right to own property and the right to divorce their husbands without losing their wealth which Athenian women did not have. Also unlike Athenian women, Spartan women would not marry at a very young age. They’d generally marry between the ages of eighteen and twenty. The person they married would often only be a few years older than them. In Athens, women were often forced to marry an older man during their teenage years. Another benefit of being a woman in Ancient Sparta instead of Ancient Athens is that Spartan women were in charge of the household and the cooking and cleaning was not left up to them.
In academic fields, “many” means an unknown quantity and will mislead the readers into the author’s personal perspectives. In Story’s article, readers can find “many” not only in personal statements but also in the statistical data. Therefore, readers will be unconsciously influenced and agree that the best choice for mothers is staying at home if Shafer doesn’t point the issue. What’s more, Shafer also accuses Story spend a lot to her daughter to Yale University. Accordingly, the purpose of the article is suspect. Even if there will be more professors’ statements and database without the exact number, readers cannot tend to one
MARDI GRAS!!!!! Yes, New Orleans' famous Carnival season is this years' never-ending party and you're invited. Mardi Gras, famous for its colorful and cultural parades, is an experience you can't go any longer w/out! The Streets are packed with both tourists and Native Louisianans as they celebrate Mardi Gras in full color and sound. . The Huge Parades come flashing down the street we fresh music, an explosion of lights, and spectacular floats. Everyone is having a great time, enjoying the festivities of the parade. So you're new to Mardi Gras, but don't want to act like it? Here in brief, are the basic facts about Americas' greatest party.
Two and half million children everyday are saved from vaccines (“Should”). Many people in America think that parents should not have the decision to let their children opt out of getting vaccines. The controversy of immunizations can be understood through learning about immunizations and how they are used, why people are for and against immunizations and why they are used, and the cons and pros of immunizations.
Vaccines are a controversial topic. While there are many benefits to getting vaccinated, there are also some concerns. The benefits include immunization against many deadly diseases, debilitating diseases, and other simply annoying diseases. The concerns include everything from fears about vaccines causing autism, feeling they aren’t necessary for what they cost, and contracting the disease from the vaccines. While certain concerns may be valid, others are much less so, and will be examined and explained why I would choose to vaccinate my child.
Vaccinations have been a controversial topic over the years because the benefits are inevitably invisible. People who do not receive the disease are unaware of the good that comes out of the vaccination as well as the risks. There are multiple killer diseases out in the world that could and do harm unsuspecting victims and need to be prevented; therefore, vaccinations are the solution. A vaccination is the injection of a killed or weakened organism that produces immunity in the body against that organism (vaccine.gov). Research shows that vaccinations have decreased the percentages of diseases such as Measles, Mumps, and Rubella, more than 90 percent (Immunize for Good). Even though some parents are worried about the slight risks and the money
Vaccines are much safer than people make them out to be; it is the easiest way to avoid future health problems. People become so suspicious and apprehensive about vaccines because they are not educated about the real facts. Before parents or individuals decide on whether or not to administer vaccines, that person should be sure to do research. One needs to make an educated decision and not a blind opinion on the crucial subject of vaccinations. The US Department of Health and Human Services states, “Vaccines are some of the safest medical products available,” (Pro & Con Arguments: "Should Any Vaccines Be Required for Children?"). Social media has a tendency to over exaggerate negative cases against the benefits of vaccines, which influences people to oppose immunization. It is essential for people to be informed of all viewpoints when determining their future
Alcatraz was one of the most notorious prisons during the early 1930’s to early 1960’s. All the well known gang members like Al “Scarface” Capone and Robert “Birdman of Alcatraz” were convicted and sent to live the rest of their life in Alcatraz. The U.S. praised Alcatraz for being inescapable. Everyone thought Alcatraz was “escape proof”, but they were proven wrong. Three men did the impossible and managed to escape the hell hole called Alcatraz.However, I don’t think they could survive the escape due to the information I read about accounts after their escape.
Vaccines are very effective in defending children from infectious disease. Although there has been tremendous success in achieving population based childhood immunization programs, more and more parents have chosen to delay the registration or even refuse to vaccinate their children at all (Diekema, 2012, p. 391). People are starting to challenge the necessity, safety and tolerability of vaccinations because the public attention has been diverted from the decreasing incidence of disease to the ambiguous risks of side effects of vaccines (Heininger, 2009, G9). Despite its outstanding performance in preventing diseases, maintaining high level of vaccination coverage needs public understanding as well, particularly the acceptance of parents
On June 11, 1962 three prisoners tried to escape from the most feared prison in America better known as “the rock”. Not even the notorious prisoners could escape. Frank, Clarence and John desperately wanted to show everyone that they could escape from Alcatraz. It was almost impossible to escape from. Frank Morris, John Anglin, and Clarence Anglin died trying to escape from Alcatraz because the waters were too dangerous, too cold, and most people failed trying to escape.
Many parents ask, are vaccines safe for my child? I am one of those parents but the more research that I have done, has put wondering thoughts to rest. Many parents believe that vaccinations are linked to the causes of autism, multiple sclerosis, asthma and many other health problems. Although many parents have legitimate reasoning to not have their children receive vaccines, there are more pros than cons to receiving the vaccines. In rare cases children have became sick after immunizations, some life threatening. Because of vaccine safety and studies, the change in affordability of the vaccines, and recent decreasing results of major disease outbreaks, vaccines are helping keep children and our society safe.
As a child, you probably dreaded getting your shots, even though you knew they would help you. Vaccines used to be a normal part of childhood for many people, being as common as skinning your knees during recess or losing a tooth. Today however, many people are opting out of vaccinating their children. They claim that since vaccine preventable disease rates are dropping, their child won’t get it despite being unvaccinated. People also fear that chemicals in vaccines can be harmful, and cause developmental disorders like autism. Almost all states don’t have laws that mandates immunizations, despite the proven benefits of them. Even though some people think vaccines are harmful, they should be required because they prevent health problems, help eradicate diseases, and can even protect others who can’t get vaccinated.
Furthermore, television violence causes aggressive behavior in children. Many people believe that children who watch violent television programs exhibit more aggressive behavior than that exhibited by children who do not (Kinnear 23). According to the results of many studies and reports, violence on television can lead to aggressive behavior in children (Langone 50). Also, when television was introduced into a community of children for the first time, researchers observed a rise in the level of physical and verbal aggression among these children (Langone 51). The more television violence viewed by a child, the more aggressive the child is (“Children” 1).