Medea Feminist Analysis

1500 Words3 Pages

The representation of women in Athenian tragedy was performed exclusively for men, thus Euripides' portrayal of Medea displaying traits common to a Grecian hero was somewhat radical. Throughout the play, Euripides continually establishes Medea as one who depicts the duality of having both stereotypically feminine and masculine qualities within her character. He paints her as one who embodies both the typically male personality of a cunning, deceptive and manipulative being, but also one that experiences emotion vividly, and lacks sound reason or conscience. The dichotomous delineation of both her feminine and masculine sides are shown in her lack of composure and obedience, and the way in which she demands revenge for the wrongs others have done to her, respectively. Euripides uses the role of the Chorus and Nurse to assist the audience in understanding Medea’s actions, and thus reconciles Medea’s doings to those of a slighted woman and tragic hero.

Medea’s name itself means ‘cunning’ in Greek, alluding to the fact that she displays qualities that are uncharacteristic to the portrayal of her sex in Ancient Greece. While, idiosyncratically, women are presented as docile, …show more content…

In her musings after Creon’s exit, she exclaims, “Today three of my enemies I shall strike dead, father and daughter; and my husband.”. Medea proceeds to discuss with the Chorus on the possible ways to kill her enemies, including considering killing them face to face with a sword. This imagery of Medea employing such an obviously masculine weapon repeats the notion of the dichotomous nature of her identity, employing the tactful nature of a woman, as well as the need for vengeance of a customarily male

Open Document