Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Feminist reading of media
Humans throughout history have constantly struggled in defining love, sex, and morality. Early texts such as Medea and Sappho introduce themes in relation to love, sex, and morality. For example, love can provoke emotions in their rawest form, evidently shown in both texts, as Medea murders for her lost love and Sappho mourns and rejoices over hers. In regards to sex, purity is a consistent theme, shown when Medea rages over her soiled marriage bed and Sappho over her lost virginity. As for morality, moral duties must be fulfilled and they can be used as a basis for guiding one’s actions, as Sappho follows and Jason from Medea does not. Constantly, humans struggle to find a set of guidelines for how to live their lives. Love is something most …show more content…
Raw emotions evoked by passionate love are inescapable, no matter how much time passes or how humans evolve. Emotions are important; they are formed in the very core of one’s being. They are often a guiding principle in making decisions and perceptions. When formed out of love, emotions are especially influential. Sappho, for example, is very open in expressing her raw emotions, shown well in a poem she wrote; “Thank you, my dear / You came, and you did / well to come: I needed / you. You have made / love blaze up in / my breast – bless you! / Bless you as often / as the hours have / been endless to me / while you were gone.” Clearly, Sappho’s happiness is stemming from being deeply in love. However, love does not always guarantee positive emotions; Sappho says later, “Pain penetrates / Me drop / by drop” (Barnard 61). Medea experiences similar pains from love, after betrayal by her husband, Jason. Throughout the book, Medea rages over her husband’s actions, saying at one point, “But stronger than all my afterthoughts is my fury” (Euripides 35). This fury guides Medea to take the actions she does later in the book in her plot to exact revenge on her husband. While it is debatable whether or not Medea’s murdering …show more content…
Despite this, the topics described above of love, sex, and morality are a solid foundation for guidance on how one lives their life. Out of these concepts and themes one sees right and wrong in the morality of the actions of the characters. Emotions stemming from love should be given thought, as in Sappho, but not allowed to overrule moral judgment, as in Medea’s case. The concept of purity and sex with connections to a woman’s worth and obligations to please the male and abide to patriarchy must be abolished. Sappho should not suffer due to her lost virginity, nor should Medea be concerned of her lost purity after Jason’s betrayal; men do not suffer the oppression of this culturally conceived concept as women do. Medea’s suffering from her lost love comes out of Jason’s neglect for his moral duties to love her back and be committed. The loss Jason suffers afterward because of Medea’s revenge justifies the betrayal she endured, and gives a clear example of how actions affect others and come back to haunt. Displaying a different moral duty, Sappho shows how her emotions from love and moral obligations guide and her society to a pleasant and virtuous life. Out of sex, we can see our flawed, society-constructed concepts of purity associated with virginity; and we can see their harmful and oppressive effects on women. From this, we can become aware of the injustice of
In the story of Medea, the author, Euripides, addresses the topics of foreignism and female roles in the ancient Greek society. In the play, Medea, a foreign born woman, marries Jason, a Greek man, and moves to Greece to be with him after leaving her homeland with death and devastation. Then, when their marriage fails, Medea lashes out against Jason, causing her own exile and murdering her children, to which she has no love connection, and Jason’s new wife in the process. The main character, Medea, confirms many of the alleged Greek prejudices against foreigners and creates some prejudices of her own in return. Medea’s foreign roots and misconceptions, as well as her familial and societal atrocities,
Can a simple emotion such as love be regarded as one of the greatest weapons to create or attain power? It’s a renowned fact that human beings are by nature designed to need, crave, and even require love as part of their survival mechanisms. It comes to no surprise that one of the first accounts of antique poetry maintains love and the craving for it as its main theme; thereby, reinforcing the deep importance that it upholds in the lives of many individuals. Sappho’s “Deathless Aphrodite” clearly epitomizes the suffering and bitterness that arises from an unrequited love. In Sappho’s case, which portrays the case of many, she constantly finds herself in loneliness and despair for though she tries repeatedly, she is only let down recurrently as no one reciprocates the love she gives. It is only the Greek goddess Aphrodite, who holds
Medea and Lysistrata are two Greek literatures that depict the power which women are driven to achieve in an aim to defy gender inequality. In The Medea, Medea is battling against her husband Jason whom she hates. On the other hand, in Aristophanes' Lysistrata, the protagonist Lysistrata plotted to convince and organize the female gender to protest against the stubbornness of men. In terms of defining the purpose of these two literatures, it is apparent that Euripedes and Aristophanes created characters that demonstrate resistance against the domination of men in the society.
Within Symposium, Plato portrayed Love not as an idealization, but rather on the judgment that was made from Love’s control of the human body (lecture). One speech in particular, the one told by Aristophanes, presents an interest and mythical view on the concept of love. The love he describes is a dedication to the idea of soulmate love (lecture). Spherical people were being that were completely round, “they had four hands each, as many legs as hands, and two faces, exactly alike, on a rounded neck. Between the two faces, which were on opposite sides, was one head with four ears (Plato 25).” As these beings has more limbs and eyes than any god, they were considered too powerful which led to the god Zeus, splitting them in half. Once split, the beings began to die as they starved and became idle as they could not live without their other half (Plato 26-27). Aristophanes concluded that as their separation from one another was the cause to their deaths it was no less than a demonstration for the desire humans have to love one another, as stated on page 27, “This, then, is the source of our desire to love each other … heal the wound of human nature.” The perspective Aristophanes presents is about a fusion between one object - or individual, and the object of desire; love is about momentary intimacy both physical and emotional. Aristophanes presents the desire of the momentary intimacy that the human body craves in his speech by saying “ The purpose was this so that … they could stop embracing, return to their jobs, and look after their other needs in life (Plato 27).” This particular quote is important because it represents Aristophanes’ overall view that, human beings desire one another, they need one another; however, one they obtain their object of desire they are free to continue on with the rest of life’s
A first comparison of violence between The Medea and Lysistrata leads to an important and ironic conclusion. In The Medea, violence is a pivotal component of the story's message. Medea herself is easily the most physically violent character in the story, and her methods in its plot resort to pain and death when there is conflict in need of resolution. Despite this, the actual tension in the story is not born of violence; rather, it is born of love and social strife. Jason, Medea's husband, is taking a n...
In Euripides tragic play, Medea, a woman that gives everything away for a man’s love is repaid with scorn and abandonment, leading her to seek revenge against her former lover. Euripides portrays Medea as the archetype of emotion, passion, and vengeance and Jason as a symbol of reason, forethought, and betrayal. Untamed emotion inherent to Medea’s character becomes the driving force for her bloodlust and extreme course of action following her divorce with Jason.
The tragic play Medea is a struggle between reason and violence. Medea is deliberately portrayed as not a ‘normal woman’, but excessive in her passions. Medea is a torment to herself and to others; that is why Euripides shows her blazing her way through life leaving wreckage behind her. Euripides has presented Medea as a figure previously thought of exclusively as a male- hero. Her balance of character is a combination of the outstanding qualities of Achilles and Odysseus.
This is demonstrated in Sappho’s poems because her characters are often negatively affected by the love or infatuation the poems are about. In Poem 94 the speaker states, “I simply want to be dead,” because the woman he or she loves is leaving (Sappho 641). This presents how the romantic feelings in Sappho’s poems often negatively affect her characters because the speaker of this poem is suicidal after the ending of the aforementioned romantic relationship. The speaker is ruled by her emotions and overcome with grief when the two partners are not able to work together and save the relationship. While it is not unusual for one to feel depressed after the termination of a relationship, the degree of misery that the speaker feels is directly connected to intense infatuation she held for her partner. The speaker is not the only character affected, and this is shown in Poem 1 when Aphrodite tells Sappho what she will make the object of Sappho’s affection do, “If she does not love, soon she will love/even unwilling” (Sappho 638). The other woman mentioned in this poem will be forced to love someone who she does not wish to love, which will negatively affect her because she is being forced to do something against her will. This reveals that her love is not a choice, but a passion forced onto her by a god. The characters of Sappho’s poems are often negatively affected by the love mentioned in the poems and feel those negative emotions very
Medea’s illegitimate marriage and the betrayal of Jason drive Medea to extreme revenge. Medea chooses to act with her immortal self and commit inhumane acts of murder rather than rationalize the outcomes of her actions. Medea see’s this option as her only resort as she has been banished and has nowhere to go, “stripped of her place”. To create sympathy for Medea, Euripides plays down Medea’s supernatural powers until the end of the play. Throughout the play Medea represents all characteristics found in individual women put together, including; love, passion, betrayal and revenge. Medea’s portrayal of human flaws creates empathetic emotions from the audience. The audience commiserates with Medea’s human flaws as they recognize them in themselves. Medea plays the major role in this play as she demonstrates many behavioral and psychological patterns unlike any of the other Greek women in the play; this draws the audience’s attention to Medea for sympathy and respect.
As she is "Faced with her husband's cold pragmatism, Medea responds according to her nature." Euripides really stresses the "otherness" of Medea's nature: she is "of a different kind", described in terms of nature and animals: she is "a rock or wave of the sea'", "like a wild bull", "a tiger". Yes, she is a little dangerous, but she is driven by her hear; that vital force which distinguishes the body from the corpse and has been crushed by Jason's betrayal.
Even in today’s society, gender roles play a part in how people view the world. Although more important than the gender roles are the emotions that antagonize the psyche of the human. Medea shows how jealousy can lead to revenge and influence bad decisions and ruin or even end lives. Ironically, the decisions she makes to kill her children, leaves Jason helpless much like a Greek wife during this time. She removes the opportunity for him to voice his opinions, needs, and desires. This flip of traditional gender roles shows how gender roles are not a reliable way to view a society.
Marriage – the amalgamation of two imperfect souls to form an affectionate and beautiful relationship – is exceptionally intricate and delicate. Two different people with different insights come together to form a harmonious relationship. Power, or control, is a chief concept that can “make or break” the relationship. Distribution of the ruling is frequently divided into males versus females. This partition leads to many conflicts and tribulations. In the catastrophic Greek play Medea, by Euripides, the liaison between Medea and Jason demonstrates how both males and females assert power in the relationship and how incorrect usage of this supremacy leads to dilemmas.
We also analyzed the work in regards to Ancient Greek. It was almost as though we used different lenses to understand the work. In relation to feminism, we concluded that Medea was a character that upheld a new archetype for female heroines in literature. In regard to Marxism, we concluded that Euripedes’s emphasis on the evils of greed and the importance of moderation shows that he would support a Marxist philosophy. By analyzing Medea through the “lens” of Freudianism, we concluded that the relationship dynamics between Medea, her father, and her husband – Jason, caused her to kill her own children.
In Greek mythology the role of love can vary widely and love itself can manifest in many different ways. Ultimately, it is a powerful force that can have both positive and negative affects on the lover(s). In the quest of the Golden Fleece, a love connection forms between Jason and Medea, with the help of Cupid's arrow. While this love between the two characters is strong and last a very long time, its divine roots and obsessive nature kills the meaning of true love and makes it a tool Jason can take advantage of and a curse which slowly destroys Medea.
This mutual suffering between Medea and the Chorus raises issues such as the treatment of women at the time when this play was written. When Medea married Jason, she married herself to him for life. She was expected to be totally obedient and to accept whatever her husband willed. For her to look upon another man other than her husband would have been totally unacceptable. Whereas Jason marries another woman while he...