Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects meat consumption has on the environment
Environmental impact of meat essay
Meat packing industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects meat consumption has on the environment
The amount of poultry and cattle that are slaughtered every day never crosses a meat lover’s mind. The life and treatment animals of the meat industry encounter isn’t commonly thought about. From the day they are raised by farmers until the day they are made into food sold across the country, never became significant until reading and researching about the process was done. There are many cows that graze on the grass fields beside the highways in Nevada. Chickens also trot on farmland from time to time as well. The treatment the industry’s animals face throughout their lifetime till death, compared to those outside of the business is shocking and somewhat sickening. Living conditions are unbelievable, the development of the animals are unnatural, …show more content…
The beef industry in, The Jungle exposes and represents the harsh realities of the processing of meat. In Upton Sinclair’s book it states, “That day they had killed four thousand cattle, and these cattle had come in freight trains from far states, and some had got hurt” (66). This exemplifies the importance and significance of a cattle’s life. As workers gathered these animals, it seems as if these creatures aren’t animate nor significant because they arrive at the slaughterhouses injured without caring and nurturing aid. The merciless treatment endless numbers of cows undergo remains unimportant as long as companies and workers earn money, when meat is later sold in stores. “Cattle were driven by men with goads which gave them electric shocks. Once crowded in here, the creatures were imprisoned, each in a separate pen… leaving no room to turn round” (Sinclair 40). This demonstrates how the livestock is forced and placed in a small setting with no option but to stay still. Being electrocuted is insensitive and nauseating because it expresses the lack of compassion the industry has towards these innocent animals. The way cattle are handled by men elucidates the suffering they have to endure. In addition to the beef industry, the lives of chickens today in the modern day chicken industry are harsh and dreadful …show more content…
The routine and procedure farmers follow regarding poultry is foul. In The Omnivore’s Dilemma, it states, “The door remains shut until the birds are at least five to six weeks old… and the chickens are slaughtered two weeks later” (Pollan 140). In fact, the industry’s chickens remain in their coops or houses, they’re in the dark their whole life without sunlight (Food Inc). These emphasize the chicken’s lack of activity and presence in the world outside of their cages. For chickens to be locked up in a building filled with their own kind in the dark their whole life, it seems to be like they’re not even living. Fowl are forced to live their short and limited life in the dark without other wildlife. Compared to other species, these birds are confined and don’t have the life they were meant to be living. Furthermore, chickens aren’t developing naturally, they are genetically manipulated. According to Food Incorporated, “Because people like white meat, farmers have redesigned chickens for large breasts with antibiotics… their bones and organs can’t keep up with the rapid growth.” As industries reach the people’s wants and needs by changing the chicken’s physical traits, companies obtain a lot of money due to the fact people like larger portions of meat. Although the chickens can’t keep up with their body growth due to drugs, money is beneficial because it is highly wanted and
Upton Sinclair, the author of The Jungle, wrote this novel to unveil the atrocious working conditions and the contaminated meat in meat-packing workhouses. It was pathos that enabled his book to horrify hundreds of people and to encourage them to take a stand against these meat-packing companies. To obtain the awareness of people, he incorporated a descriptive style to his writing. Ample amounts of imagery, including active verbs, abstract and tangible nouns, and precise adjectives compelled readers to be appalled. Durham, the leading Chicago meat packer, was illustrated, “having piles of meat... handfuls of dried dung of rats...rivers of hot blood, and carloads of moist flesh, and soap caldrons, craters of hell.” ( Sinclair 139). His description
Jonathan Safran Foer wrote “Eating Animals” for his son; although, when he started writing it was not meant to be a book (Foer). More specifically to decide whether he would raise his son as a vegetarian or meat eater and to decide what stories to tell his son (Foer). The book was meant to answer his question of what meat is and how we get it s well as many other questions. Since the book is a quest for knowledge about the meat we eat, the audience for this book is anyone that consumes food. This is book is filled with research that allows the audience to question if we wish to continue to eat meat or not and provide answers as to why. Throughout the book Foer uses healthy doses of logos and pathos to effectively cause his readers to question if they will eat meat at their next meal and meals that follow. Foer ends his book with a call to action that states “Consistency is not required, but engagement with the problem is.” when dealing with the problem of factory farming (Foer).
One issue the documentary highlights is the abuse of animals and workers by the food companies, in order to reveal how the companies hide the dark side of the food world from the public. In several instances, we see animals being treated cruelly. The workers have little regard for the lives of the animals since they are going to die anyways. Chickens are grabbed and thrown into truck beds like objects, regulation chicken coups allow for no light the entire lives of the chickens, and cows are pushed around with fork lifts to take to slaughter. Many chickens are even bred to have such large breasts that their bones and organs cannot support their bodies. These chickens cannot walk and they even wheeze in pain for the cameras. The film is clearly using the unacceptable premise fallacy of appeal to emotion in this instance, because the viewer is meant to feel pity at the sight of the abused animals. This supports their conclusion, because many American’s imagine their food coming from a happy, country farm and would be horrified to know the truth.
These were only some of many examples in The Jungle about deceit and corruption exhibited in the meat packing industry. Nonetheless, plants had government inspectors to check for tubercular animals, but Sinclair explains that these inspectors were usually the kind of people who would be easily distracted by those passing, and would not regret missing dozens of other animals. Therefore, people’s faith in those government inspectors had been betrayed, and their health needs were relentlessly ignored. However, Sinclair’s exposing of the scheming meat packing industry increased the awareness of such practices occurring daily.
Meatpacking pertains to the raising, slaughtering, packaging and processing of livestock such as pigs, cows, and chickens. Prior to slaughter, animals are grown and fed. Food borne illness and pathogens still plague the meatpacking industry since the creation of meatpacking. The government plays a huge role in providing legislation and ensuring the safety of meat products and business. Although the government is meant to inspect and guarantee safety, many unlawful practices appear overlooked pertaining to the safety of meat for consumers. Meatpacking commenced thousands of years ago, and the safety of the meatpacking industry has been evaluated greatly since the industrial revolution in America. The history of the meatpacking industry in America, the impact of literature such as the novel of the jungle written by Upton Sinclair, the rendering and irradiation of meat, and current worker issues contribute to the horrible safety precautions as well as the awful environment involving the meatpacking industry.
My Year of Meats (Ozeki) tells the story of two women in two very different parts of the world, and their tumultuous, life-changing journey with meat over the course of a year. Both characters come face to face with situations that test their beliefs and morals, as well as their resolve. There are many themes and lessons that come out of the two women’s’ journey regarding the media, meat products and capitalism, but one of the majors themes that is present in all aspects of the story is the idea of how ideals are carried through society. At one point or another, both women are faced with a choice to either continue on the path their life is currently on, or go against society and change their course. Ruth Ozeki supports the idea in her book that in order to be truly happy and have a less stereotypical society, each individual member of society must be willing to look at their own lives and change it themselves; otherwise, true change will never happen, and society will never be able to move past its limiting views.
At the turn of the twentieth century “Muckraking” had become a very popular practice. This was where “muckrakers” would bring major problems to the publics attention. One of the most powerful pieces done by a muckraker was the book “The Jungle”, by Upton Sinclair. The book was written to show the horrible working and living conditions in the packing towns of Chicago, but what caused a major controversy was the filth that was going into Americas meat. As Sinclair later said in an interview about the book “I aimed at the publics heart and by accident hit them in the stomach.”# The meat packing industry took no responsibility for producing safe and sanitary meat.
“I wished to frighten the country by a picture of what its industrial masters were doing to their victims; entirely by chance I stumbled on another discovery--what they were doing to the meat-supply of the civilized world. In other words, I aimed at the public’s heart, and by accident hit it in the stomach” (Bloom). With the publication of a single book, Upton Sinclair found himself as a worldwide phenomenon overnight. He received worldwide response to his novel and invitations to lectures all over the world including one to the White House by President Roosevelt. In late 1904, the editor of the Appeal to Reason, a socialist magazine sent Sinclair to Chicago to tell the story of the poor common workingmen and women unfairly enslaved by the vast monopolistic enterprises. He found that he could go anywhere in the stockyards provided that he “[wore] old clothes… and [carried] a workman’s dinner pail”. Sinclair spent seven weeks in Chicago living among and interviewing the Chicago workers; studying conditions in the packing plants. Along with collecting more information for his novel, Sinclair came upon another discovery--the filth of improper sanitation and the processing of spoiled meat. With the publishing of his novel, Sinclair received international response to its graphic descriptions of the packinghouses. The book is said to have decreased America’s meat consumption for decades and President Roosevelt, himself, reportedly threw his breakfast sausages out his window after reading The Jungle. However, Sinclair classified the novel as a failure and blamed himself for the public’s misunderstanding. Sinclair’s main purpose for writing the book was to improve the working conditions for the Chicago stockyard workers. Sinclair found it...
In the novel The Jungle written by Upton Sinclair, the unimaginable horrors behind the food industry and fundamental support by capitalism are exposed. Sinclair illustrates the foul unsanitary procedures carried out in the meat packing industry and creates a grotesque image for readers. He quotes, “This is no fairy story and no joke; the meat would be shoveled into carts, and the man who did the shoveling would not trouble to lift out a rat even when he saw one—there were things that went into sausage in comparison with which a poisoned rat was a tidbit” (163). In The Jungle, capitalism is what drove the meat processing industries to comply with health hazards and continue the distribution of unsafe products.The food industry in present day
In the book Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer, the author talks about, not only vegetarianism, but reveals to us what actually occurs in the factory farming system. The issue circulating in this book is whether to eat meat or not to eat meat. Foer, however, never tries to convert his reader to become vegetarians but rather to inform them with information so they can respond with better judgment. Eating meat has been a thing that majority of us engage in without question. Which is why among other reasons Foer feels compelled to share his findings about where our meat come from. Throughout the book, he gives vivid accounts of the dreadful conditions factory farmed animals endure on a daily basis. For this reason Foer urges us to take a stand against factory farming, and if we must eat meat then we must adapt humane agricultural methods for meat production.
In “Crimes Unseen” Dena Jones illustrates farm animal suffering through many sources. She suggests Americans are not conscious of terrible acts and circumstances before slaughter occurs, but should be concerned. Society removes the reality that meat was living and capable of being scared and hurt. Laws for less painful death have been in place and had modifications; however, previous improvements from changes are speculatory due to lack of available information gathered. There are many examples of disregard for living beings and the laws protecting them. Workers, desensitized over time, show minimal concern for contaminants and none for animal well-being. Ultimately, increasing quantity and speed of animals killed leads to unwarranted suffering by improper stunning, skinning, gassing, and electrocuting. While seemingly improvements have been made, enforcing loose laws with limited support proves difficult. Furthermore, if cattle standards have been rais...
Tom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Services, Livestock Slaughter. 2005 Summary, March 2006: USDA, NASS, Poultry Slaughter: 2005
Factory farms have depicted cruelty to animals during a manner that's horrific. Sadly, the general public usually does not see what really goes on within these “farms.” Chemicals, animal byproducts, medicine, meat that comes from its own species, and plastic are products that are fed to the animals that live in these factory farms (Adams, 2007). These animals are tortured and used for strictly slaughter so as to be consumed. Generally massive numbers of animals are kept in closed and tight confinements, having solely very little area to move around. Many animals suffer in very difficult circumstances. The animals are genetically altered to grow quicker or to provide rather more milk or eggs than they naturally would. Several animals reach below their own weight and die simply inches far from water and food (Bliss, 2012). This is just one of many examples of the cruel actions factory farmers have put upon the vulnerable animals. Wh...
Now knowing what they will and will not eat, but what is read and white meat? What is the difference between the two, is one healthier over the other? What is foul and why do vegans/vegetarians stay away from it? There are 3 different types of meat. Red (beef, bison, deer, lamb, goats, and pork) which compact with iron, protein, and myoglobin. White which is compact with protein, potassium, iron, zinc, riboflavin, thiamine, and vitamins B6 and B12. Has less fat and calories than red meat. White meat, has a lighter color than red meat, this comes from birds and "small game" such as chicken, turkey, duck, goose quail and pheasants. White meat though According to "Meat: Good or Bad?"has no ties to cancer, diabetes, or any health defects when
Factory farms have portrayed cruelty to animals in a way that is horrific; unfortunately the public often does not see what really goes on inside these “farms.” In order to understand the conditions present in these factory farms, it must first be examined what the animals in these factory farms are eating. Some of the ingredients commonly used in feeding the animals inside factory farms include the following: animal byproducts, plastic, drugs and chemicals, excessive grains, and meat from members of the same species. (Adams, 2007) These animals are tortured and used for purely slaughter in order to be fed on. Typically large numbers of animals are kept in closed and tight confinements, having only little room to move around, if even that. These confinements can lead to suffocation and death and is not rare. Evidence fr...