Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Meaning of life an essay
There have been many predictions as to what the meaning of life is. Many people wish to know why we live and what makes life meaningful. The answer is simple: the meaning of life is to find the meaning in life. Research regarding meaning in life has been directed by three different measurements: purpose in life, life regard, and the sense of coherence. These measurements determine if an individual has achieved a scientific definition of a meaningful life. However, every individual must learn how to find their own version of a meaningful life. Some people end up taking different perspectives during their search for meaning, such as one of philosophy, one of experience, or one of psychology.
In Siddhartha, Herman Hesse portrays a man that finds
…show more content…
the meaning in his life. During the journey that Siddhartha takes to find meaning, he switches between the life of the ascetics and the life of material possessions and self-indulgence. Throughout his journey, Siddhartha does not worry that he may someday die. He knows that he will because it is part of the ongoing cycle. However, the knowledge that he will die does not deter him from living his life. According to Samuel Scheffler, this is because “What is necessary to underwrite the perceived significance of what we do, it seems, is not a belief in the afterlife but rather a belief that humanity will survive, at least for a good long time.” Since humanity will live on, Siddhartha can continue to search for his own personal meaning in life. Later in the novel, when Siddhartha meets the ferryman Vasudeva, he is able to learn from Vasudeva as well as the river. Both the river and Vasudeva show Siddhartha the unity that lies within the world. It is the unity that creates the perfect Om that Siddhartha hears from the river – all of the voices that speak, laugh, and cry blend together to form one sound and one word. The word that Siddhartha hears is Om ad this is the word that he had meditated on so much when he was an ascetic. It is this word that allows Siddhartha to come to the realization that unity is all around him. As Bertrand Russel states, “The happy man is the man who does not suffer from either of these failures of unity, whose personality is neither divided against itself nor pitted against the world.” From the unity, Siddhartha is able to reach the blissful state of Nirvana. In Siddhartha’s culture and in his religion, the goal of life is to reach this state where he no longer has to suffer from the never-ending, onerous cycle. The meaning that Siddhartha finds in his life comes from the understanding and experience of unity. From a scientific approach, this unity is the sense of coherence that can be measured and can prove that Siddhartha has achieved a meaningful life. From an experiential perspective, the meaning in life stems from going and experiencing everything there is to experience.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer shares the story of a very brave man named Christopher McCandless. McCandless went exploring in a very dangerous mountain range in Alaska. He was found dead in 1992, four months after he left all of his money and material possessions in order to create a new life for himself. Many people believed that he was crazy or that he actually wished to die. However, Krakauer is able to give examples that show that some people are able to find meaning in their lives as they risk their lives. The papar Irish monks, for example, would constantly risk their lives and put themselves in very precarious situations so that they would be able to escape society and find lonely places. These lonely places provided the monks with the peace that they were searching for. Krakauer states that, “reading of these monks, one is moved by their courage, their reckless innocence, and the urgency of their desire” (Krakauer 97). By using a juxtaposition between the papar Irish monks and Chris McCandless, Krakauer is able to show McCandless’s genuine desire for his meaningful, peaceful life. Therefore, though it might not have been his main goal, McCandless found himself to be in this lonely yet peaceful situation. He was very close to civilization, however, “McCandless was cut off from the rest of the world…[and] he didn’t encounter another living soul” (Krakauer 165). Though some may find him crazy, McCandless was able to find meaning in his life by experiencing the world and by experiencing life without all of the distractions that come from living in civilization. He had a responsibility to himself to explore the world around him so that he could discover its meaning. Had McCandless lived through his exploration, he would have been able to have a specific regard for life that only one who has put themselves in danger can understand. It is
this life regard that stems from experience that brings McCandless the meaning in his life. In The Catcher in the Rye, J.D. Salinger depicts Holden Caulfield as a confused and lost teenager so that he can be shown as he finds the meaning in his life. Ever since his younger brother Allie died, Holden has been unable to bring himself to complete his schoolwork on time. This causes him to flunk out from his schools or, as with Pencey Prep, to give up and quit. According to the research of psychologist James Marcia, Holden is in the identity status known as diffusion. He has shown little commitment and has done little exploration in his life. In other words, at his current stage in life, he doesn’t know who he really is. That is why the meaning in life for Holden comes from finding an identity. Identity can be defined as “a person’s sense of placement within the world – the meaning that one attaches to oneself in the broader context in life” (Erikson). During the novel, Holden is constantly pretending to be a different person than his normal self (as seen when he goes drinking and attempts to have a prostitute come to his room). The only time his true identity is shown is when he describes how he wants to save the children from jumping off the cliff (or how he wants to be the catcher in the rye). He wishes to be a protector because he was unable to do so for his brother Allie. Additionally, Holden often inquires about the ducks in the pond and where they go. This is a motif that represents an inquiry from Holden about what the meaning of life really is. Since he has not found his identity, he has not found the meaning in his life and since he has not found the meaning in his life, he cannot know what the meaning of life truly is. Asking “what is the meaning of life?” is pointless. Each person that is asked this question will provide a different response because this questions resonates differently with most people. However, the majority of responses can be traced back to meaning. Everyone searches for the meaning in their own lives whether consciously or unconsciously. They strive to have a “whole” feeling or a satisfactory feeling of completion. Therefore, the want of finding meaning in life is actually the meaning of life.
...en writing a book based on ethos, logos and pathos, it is very challenging for an author to stay completely objective. In Krakauer’s case, his bias comes out strongly in certain chapters, sometimes detracting from his argument. Some faults exist in his credibility and logic, but his use of emotional appeal makes up for what those areas lack. Krakauer does an excellent job developing the character of Chris McCandless. The author brings him back to life with his descriptions and is able to make him tangible to the reader. The discussion over what McCandless's thoughts were when he went on his fatal trek will continue as long as his memory lasts. Ultimately, the readers of Into the Wild are left to form their opinion of McCandless, with Krakauer nudging them along the way.
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.
Life is a form of progress- from one stage to another, from one responsibility to another. Studying, getting good grades, and starting the family are common expectations of human life. In the novel Into the Wild, author Jon Krakauer introduced the tragic story of Christopher Johnson McCandless. After graduating from Emory University, McCandless sold of his possessions and ultimately became a wanderer. He hitchhiked to Alaska and walked into the wilderness for nearly 4 months. This journey to the 49th state proved fatal for him, and he lost his life while fulfilling his dream. After reading this novel, some readers admired the boy for his courage and noble ideas, while others fulminated that he was an idiot who perished out of arrogance and
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others.
Chris McCandless does not wish to follow defined life structure that society enforces to simply be alive, instead, he chooses to take a seek a path to live a life with purpose. Such an eagerness to seek detachment from what is expected by society, is enforced by not only McCandless but also Thoreau. A primary factor resembling this, is McCandless’ view that many people “live within unhappy circumstances...yet will not change…they are conditioned to a life of security, conformity, and conservatism...damaging to the adventurous spirit(40).” The detesting tone risen through the confliction of “unhappy circumstances” and “damage,” to “safety, conformity and conservation,” emphasis his will to separate from a lifestyle lacking change. This is done
Chris McCandless is regarded as being something as a spiritual figure almost as a cult hero, some call him a disillusioned fool, some call him a great adventurer, and the debate still continues. As Matthew Power calls in his article, an article where he tells the story of McCandless,“The debate falls into two camps: Krakauer's visionary seeker, the tragic hero who dared to live the unmediated life he had dreamed of and died trying; or, as many Alaskans see it, the unprepared fool, a greenhorn who had fundamentally misjudged the wilderness he'd wanted so desperately to commune with.” Like so many stories covering Christopher McCandless’ death, both ends of the argument are discussed in an unfavored manner in the hopes to help develop an opinion on the McCandless story. This open ended question can only be answered open-endedly based on what the readers base for themselves as covered stories intend. Like Power has done, ...
The novel “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer goes into great detail to describe the main character, Chris McCandless, who died traveling alone into the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless, whom in the novel renamed himself Alex, left his home and family to travel to Alaska in 1992. In Alaska McCandless planned to live an isolated life in the desolate wilderness, but unfortunately he did not survive. This non-fiction novel portrays his life leading up to his departure and it captures the true essence of what it means to be “in the wild”.
In the novel, A Hero’s Journey, Joseph Campbell, an American mythologist, writer, and lecturer, states that “every decision made by a young person is life decisive. What seems to be a small problem is really a large one. So everything that is done early in life is functionally related to a life trajectory” (Campbell). In mythic criticism, the critic sees mythic archetypes and imagery connecting and contrasting it with other similar works. Certain patterns emerge, such as a traditional hero on a journey towards self actualization. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer portrays this hero’s journey. The protagonist of the novel, Chris McCandless, hitchhikes to Alaska and walks alone into the wilderness, north of Mt. McKinley. He had given $25,000 in savings to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his wallet, and invented a new life for himself. He thought that the reality of the modern world was corrupt and uncompassionate, so he went on this journey in order to find a life of solitude and innocence that could only be expressed through his encounters with the wild. During this ambitious journey to find the true meaning of life, Chris McCandless exhibits a pattern like the type explained above. In Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris McCandless follows this mythic pattern, seeking to be the traditional hero who spurns civilization, yet he discovers that modern heroes cannot escape their reality.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.
Since time immemorial, society has become increasingly complex, leading otherwise successful people to retreat to their origins. This is often due to an inability to adapt and find true happiness in mainstream civilization. The case of Christopher McCandless from the film Into the Wild is no exception to this rule. Mr. McCandless divests himself of his identity and retreats to the wilderness of Alaska. This journey was what eventually led to his ultimate demise. While it is clear that he was courageous in embarking on this quest, it was unfounded in logic and born of arrogance, stupidity and recklessness. Mr. McCandless knowingly demonstrated a lack of regard for his own life and safety by making several poor decisions. Moreover, he carelessly and selfishly gave up a life of privilege that many covet. Furthermore, Mr. McCandless showed regret for his decisions, further proving his initial recklessness. Based on this, it is clear that Christopher McCandless’ reckless actions that led to his death were founded in arrogance and stupidity. For this reason, he must take responsibility for the ultimate outcome.
In this post, we’ll explore some of these viewpoints. We’ll first look at six different schools of thought and what they’ve said about the meaning of life. We’ll then look at some of the most common perspectives on the subject: the religious and the secular way of explaining your purpose. Finally, we’ll provide you some steps to help make more sense of it all and to find your own purpose and passion to live a more meaningful life.
I am going to make two points now. One, there is no meaning to life; you must create the meaning of life, and most especially, your life. And two, there most definitely is a purpose to life, and especially to your life, but you must discover it. These two ideas work together. Once you find your purpose, you will be able to see the "meaning" of your life.
The meaning of life is a very confusing question but to be able to answer it you must realize that it differs for everyone. There is never only one real answer. Everyday it can change for each individual. Everyone has their own way of living; they have their own thoughts and beliefs so therefore each persons answer to the meaning of life will be their own private version.
Back again to the one and only point: if a meaning exists it is not necessarily the purpose of our creation or existence. It has a larger scope, and can refer to the meaning of the existence of the being or force creating us, if such a force exists. So if we now define ourselves as being after the meaning of all things, and not necessarily after the purpose of our creation, we must decide what exactly could be the 'meaning of life'.