Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theoretical perspectives on child development
My own perspective on child development
What are the implications of the theory for social work practice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theoretical perspectives on child development
Introduction There are several theories a social worker can utilize when analyzing the events within any of their cases. It is up to the social worker to apply the most appropriate theory and use the information outlined in that theory to help their client in the most effective, and personalized way possible. Many theories may be helpful within just on case. For the purpose of this paper, I will discuss two theories that appear to hold relevance to the McKinley family case discussed in the text. The theories discussed in the following paper will be the Developmental Perspective, and the Social Behavioral Perspective.
Theories Defined Firstly, the Developmental Perspective can be defined as the way human behavior unfolds over a life (Hutchison,
…show more content…
The Developmental Perspective tells us that there is a typical way in which a person develops. It tells us that there are biological, sociological and psychological processes that are at play that influence the development of a person (Hutchison, 2015). It suggests that all people will develop in a similar way, or at least experiencing a similar path of developmental events if given the chance to interact with their environment in a health way (Hutchison, 2015). Conversely, social behavioral theory suggests that development is the dependent of what the person learns from imitating what is defined as the norm in their surrounding environment (Hutchison, 2015). Developmental Perspective suggests that there is a universal developmental experience for all people, while social behavioral theory suggests that what is “typical” is defined by what and who is immediately surrounding you (Hutchison, 2015). The author of this paper believes that Social behavioral theory lends itself to a more diverse application because it does not have clearly defines norms, but instead allows for a person’s immediate environment to define what is typical. Both theories understand that the way a person interacts with their environment will impact their …show more content…
The theory discusses Self Efficacy, or the sense of personal competence. Here a social worker should look to make sure that the family feels that they are personally equipped for the role they have taken on with their mother (Hutchison, 2015). Agency suggests that they can make things happen, and that they have the ability to impact their environment with their will (Hutchison, 2015). The family has been working so hard to handle all of the various struggles in their lives, and repeated attempts to succeed followed by further hardships may have left Marcia feeling like she no longer had personal agency, and may even affected her self efficacy. It would be the social workers role to, again, find the support the family needed to help take care of any one of the mounting issues with the mortgage, finances, and just the pain of facing the death of a beloved family member in the near future. Assistance in any of these areas may help improve the feeling of helplessness in the
As a social worker it is often complex to determine which theory to employ in practice, each client will warrant for an in-debt assessment of the presenting problem and goals the client desires to achieve. This paper will explore one family intervention model that can be applied to the Taylor family. The two theories analyzed are Cognitive Behavioral Family Theory, (CBFT) and Structural Family Theory (SFT); both theories can be utilized when assisting individuals or families. The social worker will focus on the Cognitive Behavioral Family Therapy model when applying treatment and interventions to the Taylor family case.
Both Erik Erikson’s (1963) theory and Mary Ainsworth and John Bowlby (1973) theory support the idea that early life experiences impact the person across their lifespan. Both theories believe that personality begins to develop from a young age and therefore occurrences in early life can have lasting impacts on the developmental of an individual. An individual’s social and psychological development is significantly influenced by early life and childhood experiences. The experiences an individual has as a child impacts on the development of social skills, social behaviours, morals and values of an individual.
Social workers address people’s problems every day, but it’s the identification of people’s strengths that provides clues for how to solve their problems and improve their life situations (Saleeby, 2013, pp.17-20).
- - -. “Social-learning Theory:Observing and Imitating Models.” Human Development. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1992. 213-14. Print.
Psychosocial development throughout the Life Cycle theory (sometimes known as individual development theory) proposes that each individual has the ability to master their environment at all stages of life (Coady & Lehman, 2008; Hutchison, 2008). The theory had its beginnings in Freud’s psychosexual stages of child development; however Erikson is responsible for laying the groundwork for the theory as it is known today, by proposing an epigenetic model of human development (Hutchison, 2008).
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory will be applied throughout this essay to delve into the reasoning behind particular behavioural issues. According to Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory, an individual has multiple environments known as their ecological systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). Bronfenbrenner (1994) suggests that a developing child is influenced by the relationships surrounding them and the best way to understand a child’s behaviour is to look at the numerous aspects of the child’s environment and how they interact with each other. The relationships and environments that the child interacts with have been separated into layers known as the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and the overarching chronosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The microsystem is the environment where the child has direct face-to-face relationships such as at home, day care and school (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The relationships formed within the microsystem directly impact the development of a child (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). It is through the processes of repeated interactions with people, objects and symbols that the human develops (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The second layer in the ecological model is the mesosystem, which is the interaction between two of the microsystems such as the relationship between a parent and a teacher (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The exosystem is an external environment, with which the
Developmental theories are broken up into two perspectives: Life-course, and Latent Trait. These perspectives may answer questions on why juveniles have grown to lead a destructive life-style and why others grow out of their delinquency. Latent trait explains some of the tendencies we may be born with and how important it is to be there for our children. Our parenting skills do have a profound effect on how our children may lack self control or have impulsive behavior. Life course perspective takes place as we grow and learn more in life.
There are many types of development theories, Psychoanalytic theories, Cognitive theories, Behavioral and social cognitive theories, ethological theories and ecological theories. Development is how a person changes throughout their life, from the time they are conceived to the time they die. Everyone processes and interprets things and information differently. After researching these various developmental theories ecological theories best describe development. Urie Bronfenbrenner is the researcher that created the ecological theory. Psychoanalytic theories least describe development. Both Ecological and Psychoanalytic theories have certain aspects that I personally believe to make a valid point and certain aspects that do not make a valid point when it comes to development. Eclectic theoretical orientation takes pieces of each theory that makes the most sense when it comes to lifespan development and follows that system. Ecological theories are everyone and everything having an impact on a child’s development, even if those people and events have no direct contact with the child.
and behavior of the child. In fact, the more we understand about development and behavior, the better. the more obvious it becomes that nature and nurture are similarly influences. rather than determinants, not only singly but also in combination. Here below, I will endeavour to expose the leading theories dealing with the question of nature.
As we have been learning this semester in class, the experiences and ecological settings in which a child grows up in are important in giving each child their uniqueness. According to Bronfenbrenner, the degree to which individuals realize their potentials and develop their abilities is determined by interactions and experiences (Berns, 2016). It is evident that these interactions and experiences can come from different sources. In order to understand how a child’s development is influenced by their environment, it is important to know how their biological, social, and psychological characteristics are shaped
Someone can physically look like their parents, siblings or even ancestors from the third generation. When a baby is born, it is common to learn in a natural way. No one teaches a baby how to crawl or how to react when he and she is hungry. However, talents, qualities and personalities are developed through experiences. The environment in which people grew up can have a lasting effect or influence on the way they talk, behave and respond to things around. According to Steven Pinker, Behavioral genetics has shown that temperament emerges early in life and remains fairly constant throughout the life span, that much of the variation among people within a culture comes from differences in genes, and that in some cases particular genes can be tied to aspects of cognition, language, and personality (2). Researchers believe that the origin of behaviors occur in genes in the DNA or even animal instincts which this concept is known as nature of human behavior. Other researchers believe that people are they were they are because they are taught to do so. This concept is well known as nurture in human behavior. In society, there will always be the doubt between Do we born in this way or do we behave according to life experiences? I strongly believe that nurture plays an important role in the upbringing of a child and the decisions that one makes in the future. Firstly, humans learn from their environment and other’s behaviors. Secondly, culture is a huge remark in people’s life. Finally,
Developmental psychology is an area of research devoted to explaining the continuing growth and change that occurs over the course of one’s life. Throughout history many varying theories have been used to attempt to explain the complex process of childhood experiences altering who individuals become as an adult.
... conclusion maturational theorist Arnold Gesell believes that a child will develop biologically and their environment has little involvement in a child’s development. Through a numerous of conducted experiments, he was able to put together and create a schedule of when milestones will occur which is known as the ‘Gesell Developmental Schedule’ where he was able to compare a child’s development to the standard norm. He also created the “Gesell Maturational Theory’, where heredity is of much more importance in their growth and development than the child’s nurturing environment. Gesell’s maturational theory is seen yet till today in a child’s everyday lives, from the time they are in the foetus till our adult life. His theory displays both strengths and weaknesses and other theorists challenging his theory but the debate between nature versus nurture will always arise.
Child growth and development is a process that consists of some building blocks, which are components that combine in an infinite number of ways (Cherry, n.d.). As a result of the variations of building blocks in a child’s development, educators, psychologists, and philosophers have been constantly engaged in the debate of nature versus nurture debate. Many researchers agree that child development is a complex interaction between his/her genetic background (nature) and his/her environment (nurture). In essence, some developmental aspects are strongly affected by biology whereas other aspects are influenced by environmental factors. From the onset of an individu...
The application of developmental social work over the past era has been characterized by vibrant debate between academics, policy-makers and practitioners about what the differences are between this approach and mainstream social work; and the pace of change towards a developmental model has been widely acknowledged as slow (Patel and Hochfeld, 2008). A particular area of argument has been the place of therapeutic social work in this model. Conceptual confusion about developmental social work has been common, especially amongst those who pitch developmental social work against work with individuals with social problems. That is, conceptual clarity continues to remain a barrier in the theoretical development of the approach including a lack of clarity about its methods and its domain. Lack of clarity on what developmental social welfare entails has a major impact on the progress of developmental social work. This can be achieved through continuing professional development. At the same time, the curriculum should prepare social work students for developmental social