Mccandless Book: I Am Against Christopher Mccandless

1566 Words4 Pages

Alexxus Roth
Stornello
LA 4
12 March, 2018
I Am Against Christopher McCandless
Introduction:
I am against Christopher McCandless, and his decision of going into the wild. I believe his stupidity got him killed. McCandless was self-centered, foolish, and not being open to allowing help from the people throughout his adventure. With all of these things McCandless proves that this whole trip was just a set up to die and die he did.
First Paragraph: One of the first things most people criticized McCandless for was being “self-centered”. The first thing that Krakauer shows McCandless being self-centered was him up and leaving his sister behind. Krakauer states that “There were eight children in the extended family; a younger sister, Carine, …show more content…

McCandless proceeds on this trip with no sense of mind to tell people where he was from or even who he was. “But because he had been carrying no identifications, the authorities didn't know who he was, where he was from, or why he was there” ( Krakauer 14). McCandless wanted to to go on this adventure and be very sakrete about it. By not allowing people to know who he was no one could identify his body. When McCandless was found he had no identification on him which made it hard to find out who he was or even what he was doing there without his journals. As a matter of fact, along with not bringing his identification he didn't come along with the right tools. As Krakauer states “ By design McCandless came into the country with insufficient provisions, and he lacked certain pieces of equipment deems essential by many Alaskans…”(180). When McCandless went off to Alaska he only carried with him the things that were essential to his need. He was at a loss when it came to most things when it came to his trip into the wild, especially tools and equipment. Without the help of the people on the way McCandless would be at a loss of money and tools, like when Galligen gave him the boots or the old man giving him the fishing net. McCandless believed that he could live off the bare essentials and could “ live off the land” , but without the help along the way McCandless might have not …show more content…

McCandless went on this trip not knowing he would need money and some essentials that he just kinda up and through away. McCandless seemed as if he didn't really think before he did anything, and some of the things he did were ver dramastic. Like Krakauer shows when he says “ … abandoned his car, watch and map, and burned the last of his money before traipsing off into the wilderness doctrine,...”(71). Chris McCandless was given money from his parents for school but when he stopped doing everything to go on his adventure he got rid all of his money. Chris burned and gave away the money his parents had giving him as a touishion , instead of taking it with him and using it to get hime there safely or even get him some of the things he lacked already. As well, Chris McCandless instead of taking the car his parents wanted to give him he went out and bought a car, and then during this trip he drove it so far and then ditched it. If McCandless would have just accepted his parents car then ditched it, it wouldn't have been as bad, but he saved up to get this car and then just up and threw it away. “..he could simply abandon the datsun and resume his odyssey on foot, and that's what he decided to do”( Krakauer 29) Hitchhiking is illegal in many places, and its because of how dangerous it is. By abandoning the car he could have gotten into trouble or even killed by oncoming

Open Document