Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Free will philosophy essay
What is the differentiate of freedom from determinism
Critique of social learning theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Free will philosophy essay
We can question to what extent can it be argued that children are free? Some developmental psychologists would categorize children as: “the legitimate objects of adult attention, rather than persons in their own right.” (Mayall, 1994, p2). Suggesting that children are not really free. Subsequently, what are the implications of this for the ways children are treated by people in different roles, for example: parents or teachers? We can focus on this question by drawing on certain perspectives including: philosophical, genetically and the reasoning’s behind why some young children commit crimes. As humans, we like to think we have a certain philosophical notion of “Free Will”: This can be defined as: “the power of agents to be the ultimate creators …show more content…
If determinism is true then we can argue a weakness of the argument is that humans are not responsible or have control for what happens to them, according to Young (1991), some even go as far as to say “if we are not free agents then morality itself becomes of no account”. This causes problems for human acts of unkindness, how do we punish a criminal, if he has no moral responsibility for the murder he just committed? Moreover, some approaches in psychology see the source of determinism as being outside the individual, a key position known as environmental determinism. Otherwise known as the Social learning theory. This is the theory that people learn new behaviour through reinforcement or punishment or via observation. People learn through observing others' behaviour. If people observe positive, desired outcomes in the observed behaviour, they are more likely to model, imitate, and adopt the behaviour themselves (Nixon, 2016, Psychological Determinism Lecture). An example which highlights this is the work of “Bandura (1961), he found that children who observed aggression against a bobo doll were more likely to imitate that aggression and to be more aggressive generally in their play.” (Slater and Paul, 2014). In addition, if the children usually observed their parents being violent then Bandura concluded that those children in turn would become violent parents themselves through observation and
If determinism is true, we are not responsible for our actions since our choices are determined by factors that we have no control over.
The strongest objection to determinism is in my view the following: (3) Truth, i.e., accurate knowledge of the facts of a case is only possible for me when I can cognitively get involved with the subject. However, the precondition for this is that I am not determined by irrelevant constraints in connection with the subject — e.g., by physical factors or by my own biological-genetic constitution, but also not by prejudices and preconcieved notions: precisely because I could not involve myself in the subject because of such constraints. Reduced to a formula, this means: truth presupposes freedom.
The argument of free will and determinism is a very complex argument. Some might say we have free will because we are in control; we have the ability to make our own choices. Others might say it’s in our biological nature to do the things we do; it’s beyond our control. Basically our life experiences and choices are already pre determined and there’s nothing we can do to change it. Many philosophers have made very strong arguments that support both sides.
Observational learning involves a live, verbal, and symbolic model, which is influenced by the adapted environment. An individual acting out or demonstrating a behavior is called live model. For example, Desalvo would act out in school at a young age labeling him as a live model. Verbal model involves the description and explanation of behavior. Aker theory of social learning states (1966), “people learn deviant behavior by observing and learning from the social factors in their day-to-day lives”(p.146). Desalvo explanation of why he committed his first crime in stealing money is explained through a learning experience from his father. The symbolic model involves fictional or nonfictional characters displaying behavior through films, books, online media and television programs. Based on Desalvo father attitude we can speculate that himself and Desalvo would watch inappropriate television programs, which can contribute to the fathers’
Firstly, the determinist argue that “everything we do is cause by forces over which we have no control (James & Stuart Rachels 110). The free will this theory speaks of is most likely on the biological level, as there are many natural events that occur that people have no control over. For example, the act of cellular reproduction, this
However, I have taken a more compatibilist approach towards the argument of free will, determinism, and moral responsibility. I think that determinism lays the foundation for an individual to make a decision by exposing a multitude of possibilities. But, it takes free will to make the decision which in turn makes us partially responsible for our actions since we had various options at hand. I suspect that the concept that free will and determinism can coexist and oftentimes work hand in hand. Since we are predisposed to a particular body, with different DNA, and a unique mindset, I can agree that we are predetermined to think and act a certain way because of genetics and how we were raised. However, I also believe that this is not the only force at hand whenever people make decisions. As we grow and experience the world, we are faced with situations that have us question and rearrange our perspectives and the way we think. This is where determinism comes into play. For example, a child who was taught to eat meat during their early life learns about how the meat industry functions in an Environmental Science class in high school. As a result, they decided to be a vegetarian. This causal event serves as an influence that instilled a new idea into the student. However, it takes free will to ultimately make the decision to convert because it goes against what was determined for the individual. It was their autonomous choice to convert since there were two options at hand: to change their eating habits or to remain the
Over the past decade, scientists have conducted research on the effects of a belief in determinism, a belief that one acts with predetermined outcomes, on behavior and values of people. In two 2008 studies,
Determinism is the theory that everything is caused by antecedent conditions, and such things cannot be other than how they are. Though no theory concerning this issue has been entirely successful, many theories present alternatives as to how it can be approached. Two of the most basic metaphysical theories concerning freedom and determinism are soft determinism and hard determinism.
Determinism currently takes two related forms: hard determinism and soft determinism [1][1]. Hard determinism claims that the human personality is subject to, and a product of, natural forces. All of our choices can be accounted for by reference to environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary (biological) causes. Our total character is a product of these environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary forces, thus our beliefs, desires, values and habits are all outside of our control. The hard determinist, therefore, claims that our choices are determined by these factors; free will is an illusion because the choices and decisions we make are derived from our character, which is completely out of our control in creating. An example might help illustrate this point. Consider a man who has just repeatedly stabbed another man outside of a bar; the other man is dead. The hard determinist would argue that there were factors outside of the killer’s control which led him to this action. As a child, he was constantly beaten by his father and was the object of ridicule and contempt of his classmates. This trend of hard luck would continue all his life. Coupled with the fact that he has a gene that has been identified with male aggression, he could not control himself when he pulled the knife out and started stabbing the other man. All this aggression, and all this history were the determinate cause of his action.
The discussion of free will and its compatibility with determinism comes down to one’s conception of actions. Most philosophers and physicists would agree that events have specific causes, especially events in nature. The question becomes more controversial when philosophers discuss the interaction between human beings, or agents, and the world. If one holds the belief that all actions and events are caused by prior events, it would seem as though he would be accepting determinism
Now, the great question here is about the compatibility of determinism and free will. Saying that a world is deterministic directly attacks the proposition of having ultimate freedom and, if determinism exists, it is not possible to have freedom of deciding future
The discussion of free will and its compatibility with determinism comes down to one’s conception of actions. Most philosophers and physicists would agree that events have specific causes, especially events in nature. The question becomes more controversial when philosophers discuss the interaction between human beings, or agents, and the world. If one holds the belief that all actions and events are caused by prior events, it would seem as though he would be accepting determinism. For if an event has a particular cause, the event which follows must be predetermined, even if this cause relates to a decision by a human being. Agent causation becomes important for many philosophers who, like me, refuse to accept the absence of free will in the universe.
If we apply the concepts of determinist in real world, it doesn’t make sense that everything is already determined. Let’s say, two different people started the same business at the same time with the same capital. At the end of the day, a person who work hard might make more money than the other. I believe that good students who study hard can get a better grade than lazy students who do not study. If determinists were right all human being would become lazy. Nobody would want to work hard because everything is already determined whether they work hard or not. Remember it is already determined. In fact, what we are seeing in the real world is way different from what determinism
then replicating the behavior that was observed. Observational learning is an important area inthe field of psychology because according to www.ncbi.nlm.nin.gov research in observational learning represents a critical development in the history of psychology. There are many learningtheories such as classical conditioning and operant conditioning which emphasize how direct experiences, reinforcements, and punishment lead to learning, but most learning happens indirectly by watching and imitating others. Observational learning is also referred to as shaping, modeling,
Loeber, R and Farrington, D (2000). Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development and Psychopathology, , pp 737-762.