Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gladiator film analysis
Gladiator film analysis
Gladiator film analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gladiator film analysis
At first glance the movie Gladiator looks like it would be the stereotypical action movie that does nothing but throw gratuitous gore and violence at the viewer for two hours and twenty-eight minutes. And while it does deliver on the action and violence, the director. Ridley Scott, shows the viewer what it means to be human in the face of complete tragedy, and how a man can push himself further than he ever thought possible and even find hope in the name of justice. This movie is so much more than just a violent action movie. It shows what justice truly is, and how it differs from revenge. And how in that righteous crusade for justice, one can find hope where they have none.
The movies first major scene is the final battle for the Roman empire
…show more content…
When he is thrown into the fighting pit for the first time, being the experienced fighter he is, he easily slays his opponents- much to the crowds enjoyment. As he continues in the pits and moves up to bigger and tougher challenges it is evident that he doesn’t want to be killing all these people, he is just trying to survive and he takes no pleasure in it. Again, Scott is reinforcing that Maximus is a good man. Maximus never looks pleased with his killings like most of the other characters do. He never tries to do anything spectacular or entertaining in the beginning. He refused play to the crowd, he kills effectively and quickly, much to the disappointment of the crowd. At one point he quickly slays all of his opponents easily, to which the crowd boos. He then looks up at the and yells, “ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!?” mocking …show more content…
If he can get to the major championship in Rome, he will fight in front of Commodus. So he starts to play the game, pleasing the crowd and working his way up. He is building his popularity with the crowds and gaining their adoration. He is starting to have hope, hope that he can have justice for his family, and his friend, Marcus Aurelius. So he continues on, winning fight after fighting, and killing men almost as easily as someone would swat a fly. Scott is depicting for us a man who is very good at killing, perhaps the best in Rome, but he takes no pleasure in it, he is only working to achieve his
He concludes this his speech the same way that he began: with an argument of ethos that solidifies his loyalty to the good of his country, saying that he “slew my best lover for the good of Rome” and that he has “the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death.” Essentially, His entire speech employs the appeals incredibly effectively in order to portray him as a loyal Roman hero rather than the killer that
Although this storyline is very entertaining it isn't very factual. There were emperor's named Marcus Aurelius and Commodus but as for the general Maximus, no such character exists. Aurelius, during his reign from 161-180 a.d., conquered many regions and countries. Under his vision, the Roman army defeated the Parthians and also defeated the Barbarians in the Marcomannic Wars. The Emperor Aurelius was not murdered by his son and serves as co-emperor for the last three years of his life with Commodus. Many scholars believe that Aurelius was one of the greatest emperor's of Roman history. He often showed compassion and other great traits of a leader. His son, however, did not share his leadership abilities. Commodus ruled from 180-192 a.d. Aurelius had many peace treaties in the latter part of his rule that his son violated and continued to increase Roman territory. Commodus has been rumored to have been insane and maybe that's why he loved the Gladiator games so much. The gladiator games were when men dressed in warrior outfits fought each other until one died. There were also games in which wild animals were placed with men.
In the movie Maximus, a trusted Roman general is chosen to be the next emperor. Maximus is chosen over the emperor 's son, Commodus. Maximus is unable to protect his family from the threats and violent attacks of Commodus. Once his family has died, Maximus is captured as a slave and forced into gladiator games until his death. While performing for Commodus, Maximus reveals his true identity. Maximus and his lover, Commodus 's sister, create a plan to overthrow and kill Commodus. Commodus challenges Maximus to a duel in front of a raging audience. Maximus is stabbed in the lungs by Commodus but soon steals his sword and kills Commodus. Through the movie Maximus is determined to get revenge on Commodus. The archetype becomes more evident as the story goes on. Maximus completes his quest for vengeance. The gladiator is a movie telling the journey of Maximus’s “quest for
I think ''Gladiator'' presented the prospect of helping to re-establish a film genre which had not been stumbled upon successfully in a long time.
Livy begins early in establishing the basic characteristics of Romulus, arguably the most notable Roman in history. Romulus and his brother Remus were “energetic young men, who [were]… strengthened… in body and spirit.” (Livy 9). Livy then describes the clash of these attributes between the two brothers, as Romulus and Remus battle for supremacy. “From a war of words, anger turned them to bloodshed. In the heat of the melee, Remus met his death.” (Livy 11). Livy wastes no time in establishing the brutal tradition of war that helped to extend the Roman Empire. Romulus came to power because of force, and furthered his rule by the same means: “By brute force and without strategy the Roman king prevailed, using the might of his veteran army alone.” (Livy 20). This overwhelm...
Ridley Scott’s epic film, Gladiator, considered one of the greatest films in recent years, won five Academy Awards, including Best Picture. Scott’s film, tells the story of the fall and rise of the great Roman General, Maximus Decimus Meridius. The Roman Emperor, Marcus Aurelius, tells Maximus that he wishes that he ( ) the emperor after his death, instead of his son, Commodus. Angry, Commodus, murders his own father, thus becoming the emperor, and sentences Maximus and his family to death. Maximus escapes, but the Emperor’s men murder his family and burn his home. Slave traders, capture Maximus, and sell him into slavery. Maximus must rise to the top once more, and enact his revenge on Commodus. Through a liberal humanistic critique, the film contains an inherent meaning, shows the enhancement of life and propagation of values, and reveals that human nature never changes.
During his second courageous act, his wife and only son are murdered and he is to be executed. This changing his journey home as I will discuss as we move on. Furthering his acts of heroism he manages to save the lives of many slaves by battling in the arena, saving a senator from execution, and avenging his wife and son by slaying the emperor. His acts of nobility occur when he saves the senator and fulfils the wishes of the dead Marcus Aurelius. He gives Rome back to the senate and returns the power back to the people.
On that first fateful day, when Romulus struck down his own brother Remus, the cauldron of Rome was forged in blood and betrayal. The seeds on the Palatine hill cultured one of the most potent and stretching empires of human history. Though this civilization seemingly wielded the bolts of Zeus, they were infested with violence, vanity, and deception. Yet, one man—or seemingly “un”-man—outshone and out-graced his surroundings and everyone within it. He brought Rome several victories and rescued his beloved country from an early exodus, thus providing her a second beginning. This man was Marcus Furius Camillus, and against a logical and emotional mind, he was oft less than loved and celebrated. At times he was disregarded, insulted and even exiled—irrevocably an unwarranted method to reward Rome’s “Second Founder.” This contrast of character between hero and people was perhaps too drastic and too grand. The people were not yet ready to see Marcus Furius Camillus as a model of behavior to be emulated—to be reproduced. Hence, much of Livy’s Book 5 provides a foundation for the Roman people to imitate and assimilate a contrasting, honest, and strong behavior and temperament
Gladiator. Dir. Ridley Scott. Perf. Russell Crowe and Joaquin Phoenix. Dreamworks L.L.C and Universal Studios, 2000. DVD.
...istory through the use of a popular topic amongst modern readers. Strauss does often times go far too deep describing the landscape, using names of Italian cities and natural landmarks rather in depth, which loses a reader not wholly familiar with Italy’s landscape. Strauss also quite openly marvels at the figure of Spartacus himself, which could be a bias on the part of the researcher that some readers might call into question. Also, Strauss makes some definitive statements regarding why events happened, yet due to the nature of small samples of evidence, Strauss is mainly just making inductive guesswork, although usually logical guesswork. Overall though, Strauss effectively tells a lively story that enriches the reader’s knowledge on Roman history in an entertaining way.
N.p., n.d. Web. The Web. The Web. 25 Apr. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard The "Life of a Gladiator.
Gladiator (2000) is an action drama about a Roman general that is betrayed by his country and is forced to fight in the Colosseum. This particular scene, which runs for approximately 5 minutes, is the aftermath of the fight scene between Maximus, the betrayed general, and Commodus, the jealous emperor who betrayed him. This scene is not only significant because it is the concluding scene of the film, but also because it represents the end of Maximus’s enslavement and his coming to peace with dying.
He wants to be a husband to his wife, and a father to his son. He is a decorated warrior who has risen through the ranks to become Rome’s greatest general. His fellow officers regard him as triumphant in battle and courageous. He symbolizes the values of valor and honor that were key to developing a great Roman officer. His compelling sense of motivation in the beginning of the film is his yearning to go home to his wife and son. He has been a decorated soldier, all he wants now is to retire from the army, depart from the Germanic territories, and go home to live in peace. This Christian theme states that there is a time and a place for everyone, and everything. There is a time for war, a time for peace. There is a time for love, and a time for sorrow. Ecclesiastes 3:8 states, “7A time to tear apart and a time to sew together; A time to be silent and a time to speak. 8A time to love and a time to hate; A time for war and a time for peace.” Maximus understands that the time for war has come and gone, now he must no longer be an officer of the military. He must be an officer for his
...ony’s loyalty to Caesar is what keeps him pushing to get revenge and to never give up. These characters show examples of how much their motives affect what happens to them in the end.
Throughout Julius Caesar Brutus acts in accordance with his morals, which makes his eventual fall all the more tragic as Brutus genuinely believed his actions benefitted the future of Rome. Unlike most of the self-interested people around him, Brutus genuinely cares for the continued well-being of the Roman republic. Brutus sees Caesar's rise to power and imminent crowning as a danger to the freedom of the people in Rome since, "crown [Caesar] that, and then I grant we put a sting in him that at his will he may do danger with. Th' abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" (2.1.15-19). Brutus knows that many past rulers have turned into tyrants and oppressed their people after gaining substantial authority, and fears that the same tragedy will befall Rome if the Senate crowns Caesar. And although Brutus conspires to kill Caesar rather than finding a peaceful solution to this disagreement, he tells the other conspirators to limit their violence as "this shall make our purpose necessary and not envious, which so appearing to the common eyes, we shall be called purgers, not murderers" (2.1.175-178). Brutus' constant requests to preform the assassination quickly and honorably reveal his concern about the fate of the Romans acts as the motivation behind his actions (unlike the other conspirators who "did that they did in envy of great Caesar") (5.5.71).