Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparisons between Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and the movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With a total of thirty four novels written, Roald Dahl is one of the most renowned children’s book authors. From Charlie and the Chocolate Factory to Matilda, his works have been read by millions and adored by all children, but he was not always admired like he is now. He was criticized for “a persistent nastiness and brutality...and he lingers over their horrible appearances and habits” (Castella 1). His characters and their actions are often ridiculously grotesque, almost borderline sadistic, but nowadays readers have begun accepting the rebellious nature of his children’s book. Looking at one of his most famous novels, Matilda, we can see his critique regarding adults and parenthood. The book, Matilda, might have been intended not only for …show more content…
Stuart Hall, a cultural theorist, has written those in power get to determine what knowledge is universal. He goes on to say that if you have knowledge you can challenge the power. In the book, Matilda gains knowledge, she gains the power to challenge the one in control, her parents and Miss Trunchbull. Her parents and Miss Trunchbull represents those in power; they get to control what is known. If we look outside the book and in the real world, those who get to control the knowledge are the parents. They determine what is wrong and what is right because they claim kids are uneducated and inexperienced. Matilda’s knowledge gives her the faculty to save Miss Honey from Miss Trunchbull’s grasp, and gets rid of her parents. Dahl exaggerates the characteristic of all the adults in the story to prove to the readers that sometimes when the power to determine the truth is in the hands of adults it is not always in the best hands. Miss Honey is nice yet ineffective, showing that being nice is not enough. Loving your children with all your heart is not the answer either. Dahl once again demonstrates the importance childrearing. Being assertive and setting boundaries as a parent is necessary because being kind like Miss Honey is not enough as proven in …show more content…
Naturally, children are overlooked and their words and actions generally hold no weight. People have said, “Age is just a number,” but in reality we, as a society, tend to put more worth and respect in the words of the elder. The elder have been through more and they understand more. This idea of age discrimination is deeply imbedded in our society. It is completely accepted that parents and adult know best, and a young four year old girl can not talk back or question them. To question this ideology, Dahl paints adult characters that are ignorant, ineffective, and even violent, which are characteristics that adults really do have. There is a role reversal when Matilda is the most knowledgeable and powerful character even though it is because of a miracle. Dahl blatantly shows the readers that sometimes children do have valuable insight, even more so than adults. Age should not mean anything especially to parents. Parents should be willingly to listen and understand everything about their children. They should not let this false hierarchy between children and adults, limit them from listening to the thoughts of their children. This story of the brilliant young girl empowers children to dream on and to stand up for what they believe in, and in return it also teaches parents what to do and what not
Are adults overprotective of their children? To what point do we protect children? Where should the line be drawn? Along with those questions is how easily children can be influenced by these same adults. Two poets, Richard Wilbur and Billy Collins, express the ideas of how easily children can be manipulated and how sometimes adults think they are protecting their innocent children, when in reality they are not. Wilbur and Collins express these ideas in their poems through numerous literary devices. The literary devices used by Wilbur and Collins expose different meanings and two extremely different end results. Among the various literary devices used, Wilbur uses imagery, a simple rhyme scheme and meter, juxtaposition of the rational and irrational, and a humorous tone to represent the narrator’s attempt to “domesticate” irrational fears. Conversely Collins uses symbols, historical interpretations, imagery, diction and other literary devices to depict the history teacher’s effort to shield his students from reality. In the poems, “A Barred Owl,” by Richard Wilbur, and “The History Teacher,” by Billy Collins, both poets convey how adults protect and calm children from their biggest, darkest fears and curiosities.
In conclusion, critical evaluation of what makes a book good or bad depends on the selection criteria and agenda of those making the evaluation. The prizes have been criticised through the years and the selection committees have risen to this by changing the selection process, even if this change has been slow. Children’s Literature is in flux due to the ever-changing ideas and perceptions of childhood. Children’s books seen as prestigious today may become, like Blyton, unpalatable to the critics of tomorrow.
The Catcher in the Rye is not all horror of this sort. There is a wry humor in this sixteen-year-old's trying to live up to his height, to drink with men, to understand mature sex and why he is still a virgin at his age. His affection for children is spontaneous and delightful. There are few little girls in modern fiction as charming and lovable as his little sister, Phoebe. Altogether this is a book to be read thoughtfully and more than once. It is about an unusually sensitive and intelligent boy; but, then, are not all boys unusual and worthy of understanding? If they are bewildered at the complexity of modern life, unsure of themselves, shocked by the spectacle of perversity and evil around them - are not adults equally shocked by the knowledge that even children cannot escape this contact and awareness?
I agree whole-heartedly with the conclusions that she drew from her observations. It is very hard to get the whole “picture” from a children’s storybook that has no pictures. The children find it harder to identify with the characters and often find these books boring. Being able to see the pictures helps them to make connections with either the characters or with their personal experiences. For example, all small children can identify with the little monkey, George, in Rey’s Curious George. On page 27 of the book, we see George smoking a pipe because he saw the man in the yellow hat smoking it. At some point in every child’s life, he has seen an adult doing something unfamiliar and wanted to try it, just like George did. This would be a good point at which the child could articulate one of his experiences to a class or friend, helping him to become more comfortable with speaking about and sharing his thoughts.
Children within this age group however are on the path of becoming young adults with their own identities. Finding your own identity when not being exposed to any negative thought provoking subject matter is difficult. Exposing a child to such topics that are out of their comfort zones is difficult enough without having to worry how the child will take in the newfound information. But through literature, parents and educators are able to expose children to difficult subjects such as abuse, religion, drugs, and so on and guide them into making the positive choices in life. Some are lead by example, and it is much easier to lead with a fictional character the children can relate to than just expecting them to know what to do when life takes a turn for the
After a four week survey of a multitude of children’s book authors and illustrators, and learning to analyze their works and the methods used to make them effective literary pieces for children, it is certainly appropriate to apply these new skills to evaluate a single author’s works. Specifically, this paper focuses on the life and works of Ezra Jack Keats, a writer and illustrator of books for children who single handedly expanded the point of view of the genre to include the experiences of multicultural children with his Caldecott Award winning book “Snowy Day.” The creation of Peter as a character is ground breaking in and of itself, but after reading the text the reader is driven to wonder why “Peter” was created. Was he a vehicle for political commentary as some might suggest or was he simply another “childhood” that had; until that time, been ignored? If so, what inspired him to move in this direction?
As well she responds to most situations with a maturity most adults’ lack. These books all describe how the adult world is often complicated and difficult, as well as full of lies, deceit, and phoney people. The books also describe how sometimes an innocent child’s opinion can be smarter than a full grown
Children are common group of people who are generally mislabeled by society. In the short story “Charles’’ by Shirley Jackson and ‘’The Open Window” by Saki showed examples of the labeling of children. In “Charles” the concept of parents labeling their children as being pure and sincere was shown. As in “The Open Window” by Saki “used the notion that girls were the most truthful sex and gives her a name that suggests truthfulness to make her tale less suspect.”(Wilson 178). According to Welsh “Because the fantasy is so bizarre and inventive and totally unexpected from a fifteen-year-old girl, the reader is momentarily duped.”(03). This showed that even we as the readers were a victim of misleading labels of society.
... (eds), Children’s Literature Classic Text and Contemporary Trends, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan in association with Open University
Falconer, Rachel. The Crossover Novel: Contemporary Children’s Fiction and Its Adult Readership. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Richard Robinson, the President and CEO of Scholastic Inc., the world’s largest publisher and distributor of children’s books, said that a great children’s text contains a simple and original idea, is written with humour and makes the world more interesting. Despite being published in 1928, A.A. Milne’s The House At Pooh Corner remains a highly effective children’s text. The text meets the criteria set out by Richard Robinson and it has been able to do so through its good uses of literary elements such as style, themes and characters. Some examples of this can be linked to the works of various developmental theorists such as Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky and Erik Erikson.
The Tale of Peter Rabbit and Voices in the Park were published at either end of the twentieth century, a period which witnessed the creation of the modern picturebook for children. They are both extremely prestigious examples of picturebooks of their type, the one very traditional, the other surrealist and postmodern. The definition of ‘picturebook’ used here is Bader’s: ‘an art form [which] hinges on the interdependence of pictures and words, on the simultaneous display of two facing pages, and on the drama of the turning of the page’ (Bader, quoted in Montgomery, 2009, p. 211). In contrast with a simple illustrated book, the picturebook can use all of the technology available to it to produce an indistinguishable whole, the meaning and value of which is dependent on the interplay between all or any of these aspects. Moebius’s claim that they can ‘portray the intangible and invisible[…], ideas that escape easy definition in pictures or words’ is particularly relevant to these two works. Potter’s book is, beneath its didactic Victorian narrative, remarkably subtle and subversive in its attitudes towards childhood, and its message to its child readers. Browne’s Voices in the Park, on the other hand, dispenses with any textual narrative; by his use of the devices of postmodernism, visual intertextuality and metaphor, he creates a work of infinite interpretation, in which the active involvement of the reader is key.
The general idea that was shown throughout the story was the power of education and those that try to stop it. Towards the beginning of the musical, Matilda was shown reading a book while her mother and brother watched the television. The importance of this scene creates the picture for the audience of what Matilda values most. However, because of the fact she would rather read then watch the television, her mother disliked her and thought she was abnormal compared to her unintelligent older brother. Matilda’s parents wanted to distort the view of education that she held so dear. That is why her father especially tried hard to influence her choice of education over “fun”. Furthermore, education is once again shown as being important with Miss Honey, Matilda’s teacher. Miss honey confronts headmistress Agatha Trunchbull and demands for Matilda to be put into an upper-level class. Although this request is denied
The construction of children’s literature was a gradual process. For a long period of time children’s books were frowned upon. The stories were said to be vulgar and frightening. Adults censored children’s ears to stories of daily life, tales with improbable endings were not to be heard. It was not until the mid 1800s that stories of fairies and princesses began to be recognized. Although children’s literature was accepted, the books were not available for all children. With limited access to education, few public libraries, and the books’ costs, these texts were only available to the middle and high- class. As public education and libraries grew so did the accessibility of books and their popularity. They no longer were considered offensive, but rather cherished and loved by many children. Children’s literature became orthodox and a revolution began, changing literature as it was known.
Roald Dahl was a famous British Writer. He was born in Llandeff, Wales on September 13th 1916. His parents, Harold and Sofie, came from Norway. He had four sisters, Astri, Affhild, Else and Astra, His father died when Roald was only four years old. Roald attended Repton, a private school in Derbyshire. He did not enjoy his school years, “I was appalled by the fact that masters and senior boys were allowed, literally, to wound other boys and sometimes quite severely. I couldn’t get over it. I never got over it…” These experiences inspired him to write stories in which children fight against cruel adults and authorities.