Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the theme of the necklace
Essays on themes of the necklace
Essay on the theme of the necklace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the theme of the necklace
Throughout the stories the characters developed by their choices. Richard didn’t have a father he wasn't strong and had never been in a fight. But he had to step up since there wasn't anyone. He had himself and his mother if he didn’t step up there was no way he would be called a man. He was afraid to face his fears but he had to push through. Just like the short story “the necklace” her choices affected her in the most powerful way possible. In the story Mathilde wanted to look the best for this party she needed to look the best she could so she went to madame louisel and asked if she could borrow a necklace. She borrowed a diamond necklace but what she didn’t know is that the decision she made would affect her life forever. She lost the
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde feels she has been born into a family of unfavorable economic status. She’s so focused on what she doesn’t have. She forgets about her husband who treats her good. She gets too carried away being someone someone
In both of the short stories we begin to picture a woman who is less than satisfied with the way her life is. For example, in "The Necklace" we read: "She sat down to dinner, before the round table covered with a tablecloth three days old, opposite her husband, who uncovered the soup tureen and declared with an enchanted air, `Ah, the good pot-au-fue! I don't know anything better than that,' she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry" (Maupassant 108). This quote gives us an insight to, most likely, Mathilde's daily thoughts. She's unhappy with what she is given. Things like a healthy life, a happy husband, and a home. I found it peculiar that her husband seemed to be much more upbeat and happy with his lifestyle. I don't think that she has always had this attitude. Something must have made her like this.
Other details in the story also have a similar bearing on Mathilde’s character. For example, the story presents little detail about the party scene beyond the statement that Mathilde is a great “success” (7)—a judgment that shows her ability to shine if given the chance. After she and Loisel accept the fact that the necklace cannot be found, Maupassant includes details about the Parisian streets, about the visits to loan sharks, and about the jewelry shop in order to bring out Mathilde’s sense of honesty and pride as she “heroically” prepares to live her new life of poverty. Thus, in “The Necklace,” Maupassant uses setting to highlight Mathilde’s maladjustment, her needless misfortune, her loss of youth and beauty, and finally her growth as a responsible human being.
The main character in "The Necklace" is a lady named Mathilde who is extremely pretty. She is not a very wealthy person, and is married to a clerk. Mathilde is very unhappy with her life, and wishes she could have more luxuries. The author says :
Mathilde is unable to look beyond the wealth and realize if she loves her husband like he loves her, she could live a better and happy life instead of always dreaming of wealth leading her to misery. Similarly, Daisy is incapable to look past money and understand that if she did not care about money and reputation, she could have a better and grateful life. Both women fail to comprehend that something’s need to be done without thinking about wealth and status. Moreover, Mathilde’s greed for high stature leads to her misery. “ [Matthilde] ‘I lost it’. ‘I brought you another just like it and we’ve been paying for it for ten years now’… [Mme. Forestier] ‘But mine was only paste.’” (Maupassant 217). Mathilde’s achievement of wealth and status have a negative impact on her life as she spends most of life working as a maid to pay off the money that her and Mr.Loisel borrow to replace the lost necklace. When Mathilde finds out the Mme. Forestier necklace was a fake, she realizes if she was paying attention, she would have known that no one lends a real diamond to anyone but she is unable to notice the fake jewelry because she needs it be real. Her dreams of wealth and status lead to her
In "The Necklace", Guy De Maupassant creatively reveals Mathilde Loisel's dreams of a decadent lifestyle. As her struggles start to unravel, it becomes obvious that her heartache is solely caused by her own selfish and vain acts. The stature that Mathilde so desperately desired sadly resulted in a lifetime of misery and despair. She anguished over the reality that her husband lacked the riches she yearned for, she felt insignificant because of her lack of rank, and her vain obsession ended up ruining a decade of her life. What a painful and expensive lesson to learn so late in life.
Many people born into the middle to lower class of society come to accept their lot in life and make the best of it, Mathilde, the main character in Guy de Maupassant's short story, 'The Necklace', is not one of these people. Mathilde felt that she was attractive and that fate must have made a mistake in birthing her into a family that could not provide a suitable dowry for a proper marriage. This situation left her with no choice but to marry Mr. Loisel, a minor clerk. Although many would think that Mathilde would have come to accept her lot in life, she never did; as time passed she dreamed more about the things she lacked, became more discontent with the things that she did have, and she even became manipulative and inconsiderate towards her husband.
Mathilde finds a solution to her problem with the jewelry by borrowing a beautiful necklace from one of her ...
Mathilde had made that mistake by concealments of hiding her status. She always wanted to be rich and finally one night she had chance she nailed it by looking gorgeous at the ball and getting attentions of everyone at the ball. After losing the necklace she didn’t wanted her social status to look horrible as many would have thought that she didn’t lose the necklace instead she just stole it. Mathilde had maintain the status of being rich and had paid the price for her fake status by working and paying of her unwanted debt. As De Maupassant describes Mathilde one more time but not as the person she wanted to be known as.”Madame Loisel looked old now. She had become the sort of woman often found in poor household: tough, grasping, and coarse” (178). Her life would have been a lot easier if Mathilde had not faked the incident and had confessed the truth to Forestier and would only had to five hundred
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
Loisel repaid the necklace together with their sweat and tears. Mathilde didn’t have a choice; she had to change from a vain, ungrateful, material, bored wife, into a hardworking proud and loving wife. She even says, right before she runs into Mme. Forestier, “What would have happened if she had not lost that necklace? Who knows? Who knows? How life is strange and changeful! How little a thing is needed for us to be lost or to be saved!”(39) In that quote I saw 2 things, when she asked herself what would have happened if she didn’t lose the necklace, she doesn’t go into some fairytale about what life she could be living, she just accepts what she is now, even if it’s not the easiest life in the world. At the very end of that quote “How little a thing is needed for us to be lost or to be saved!”(39) The fact that she added “or to be saved!” to her thought, tells me that she realizes that she was vain and unappreciated and that she lacked character, but now she is grateful, even though it was such a terrible thing, she was grateful that she was able to say that she was a better person now, even after everything that happened to her than she ever “dreamed” of being before. Guy de Maupassant certainly described a very difficult hardship for Mathilde in “The Necklace” but in the end, everything that happened to her, made her a much better and stronger woman inside and out. This story teaches a very important lesson, you have no idea what you can do and who you can become, until your chips are down and you’re put between a rock and a hard
In the short story, The Locket, by Kate Chopin there's a group of men at war. They're having a conversation about a member of the group, Edmond's locket. He had worn it around his neck tucked into his shirt since the war had begun but nobody ever knew what the picture inside was. A few of the guys thought that it was a picture of himself. Another believed it was a magical catholic that had been keeping him from suffering any injuries the past year and a half. Both ideas were however wrong, the locket held a photo of Edmunds parents in law and wedding date. He kept this to him self though, he simply remained quiet and dozed asleep. The next morning he had been waken to fight in battle. After the battle had ended the priest came to bless the
Placing all your energy and well life into an object (like the necklace) can take years away from you. Sometimes what we think of as valuable may not be of actual value. It is all in the way you portray the items. He friend never mentioned how much the valued necklace costed because to her it did not matter. Thus when Mathilde lost it, she never asked its true value. She just assumed and went with it. If she had been honest with her friend she could have saved a lot of trouble.
At many places in the story he shows the irony of Madame Loisel’s situation. From the time of her marriage, through her growing years, Madame Loisel desires what she does not have and dreams that her life should be other than it is. It is only after ten years of hard labor and abject poverty that she realizes the mistake pride led her to make. At that point, the years cannot be recovered. In my opinion, the moral lesson of the necklace story is that we should not judge people on appearances because they may appear to be rich and successful and they may not be. It also explains us we should not pine after material possessions, but realize we are happy with what we have and we must be satisfied with what we have and what we are. We must be honest enough to confess his mistake instead of running from situations and turning back. There’s nothing wrong in have wishing though and dreams, but you must know your limits and your condition as
In “The Necklace,” Mathilde’s internal struggle is with herself. She mentally battled with the physical and financial limitations placed on her, but more with her own soul. She was unhappy with her place in life and could not accept the simplicity of her station, believing it to be truly beneath her. “All those things… tortured her and made her angry. “ Her husband’s blatant acceptance of their place only fueled her frustrations further.